Pan Stephen W, Zhang Zheng, Li Dongliang, Carpiano Richard M, Schechter Martin T, Ruan Yuhua, Spittal Patricia M
*School of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada; †Liu Institute for Global Issues, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada; ‡Currently, College of Indigenous Studies, National Dong Hwa University, Hualien, Taiwan; §Chaoyang Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Beijing, China; ‖Department of Sociology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada; and ¶Collaborative Innovation Center for Diagnosis and Treatment of Infectious Diseases, State Key Laboratory for Infectious Disease Prevention and Control, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Beijing, China.
J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2016 Dec 1;73(4):463-474. doi: 10.1097/QAI.0000000000001127.
Religion can profoundly impact the sociocultural contexts that shape sexual HIV vulnerability among men who have sex with men (MSM). However, the relationship between religion and HIV vulnerability remains poorly understood for MSM in China, where religious affiliations and practices are rapidly increasing.
Using cross-sectional survey data collected in Beijing and Tianjin, China, from 2013 to 2014 (n = 400), this study tests 3 hypotheses regarding religion and HIV sexual risk: (1) HIV vulnerabilities and testing patterns among religiously affiliated MSM are lower than for areligious MSM, (2) religiosity is inversely associated with HIV vulnerabilities and testing, and (3) the magnitude of inverse association between religiosity and HIV vulnerabilities/testing will be stronger among Christian and Muslim MSM than Buddhist and areligious MSM.
Compared with areligious participants, Buddhists had higher odds of reporting unprotected anal intercourse [adjusted odds ratio (AOR): 2.06, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.13 to 3.75] and more male sex partners (AOR: 1.95, 1.16-3.27), whereas Muslims had lower odds of reporting unprotected anal intercourse (AOR: 0.33, 95% CI: 0.15 to 0.73) and higher odds of reporting male circumcision (AOR: 3.04, 95% CI: 1.45 to 6.40). Reporting of forced sex was associated with more frequent participation in social religious activities (AOR: 1.25, 95% CI: 1.02 to 1.52) and private religious activities (AOR: 1.30, 95% CI: 1.04 to 1.61). Among Christians, participation in private religious activities was associated with lower odds of reporting anal intercourse (AOR: 0.49, 95% CI: 0.27 to 0.88).
The sustained growth of multiple religious traditions in China appears to have important implications for HIV vulnerability among religious minority MSM.
宗教会深刻影响塑造男男性行为者(MSM)中艾滋病病毒(HIV)性传播易感性的社会文化背景。然而,在中国,宗教信仰和活动迅速增加,宗教与HIV易感性之间的关系在男男性行为者中仍未得到充分理解。
本研究利用2013年至2014年在中国北京和天津收集的横断面调查数据(n = 400),检验了3个关于宗教与HIV性传播风险的假设:(1)有宗教信仰的男男性行为者中HIV易感性和检测模式低于无宗教信仰的男男性行为者;(2)宗教虔诚度与HIV易感性和检测呈负相关;(3)基督教和穆斯林男男性行为者中宗教虔诚度与HIV易感性/检测之间的负相关程度将强于佛教徒和无宗教信仰的男男性行为者。
与无宗教信仰的参与者相比,佛教徒报告无保护肛交的几率更高[调整后的优势比(AOR):2.06,95%置信区间(CI):1.13至3.75],且男性性伴侣更多(AOR:1.95,1.16 - 3.27),而穆斯林报告无保护肛交的几率较低(AOR:0.33,95% CI:0.15至0.73),报告接受男性割礼的几率较高(AOR:3.04,95% CI:1.45至6.40)。报告强迫性行为与更频繁参与社会宗教活动(AOR:1.25,95% CI:1.02至1.52)和私人宗教活动(AOR:1.30,95% CI:1.04至1.61)有关。在基督教徒中,参与私人宗教活动与报告肛交的几率较低有关(AOR:0.49,95% CI:0.27至0.88)。
中国多种宗教传统的持续增长似乎对宗教少数群体男男性行为者中的HIV易感性具有重要影响。