Kushnick Geoff, Fessler Daniel M T, Zuska Fikarwin
School of Archaeology and Anthropology, The Australian National University, Canberra, ACT, 2601, Australia.
Center for Behavior, Evolution, & Culture, and Department of Anthropology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, 90095-1553, USA.
Hum Nat. 2016 Dec;27(4):533-555. doi: 10.1007/s12110-016-9263-x.
Among the Karo of Indonesia, the frequency of matrilateral cross-cousin (impal) marriage has declined in recent decades. We conducted a vignette experiment to assess the contributions of a handful of factors in shaping this pattern. Surprisingly, we found that cosocialization of a hypothetical woman with her impal led to increased judgments of marriage likelihood and decreased feelings of disgust in male and female respondents (n = 154). We also found that females, more than males, judged impal marriage more likely when there were practical advantages. Finally, we found that younger men expressed more disgust in response to impal marriages than did older men, while women displayed an opposite but weaker reaction. This suggests the existence of gender-specific changes in attitudes toward the practice, indicating that a full understanding may require the application of sexual conflict theory. Our study illustrates the potential utility-and limitations-of vignette experiments for studying social change.
在印度尼西亚的卡罗族中,母系交叉表亲(impal)婚姻的频率在最近几十年有所下降。我们进行了一项情景实验,以评估一系列因素对形成这种模式的作用。令人惊讶的是,我们发现假设的女性与其母系交叉表亲的共同社会化导致男性和女性受访者(n = 154)对婚姻可能性的判断增加,厌恶感降低。我们还发现,女性比男性更倾向于在有实际好处时认为母系交叉表亲婚姻更有可能。最后,我们发现年轻男性对母系交叉表亲婚姻的厌恶感比年长男性更强,而女性则表现出相反但较弱的反应。这表明对这种习俗的态度存在性别差异,这意味着全面理解可能需要应用性冲突理论。我们的研究说明了情景实验在研究社会变化方面的潜在效用和局限性。