Clarkesmith Danielle E, Pattison Helen M, Borg Xuereb Christian, Lane Deirdre A
School of Health and Life Sciences, Aston University, Birmingham B4 7ET, UK.
University of Birmingham Institute of Cardiovascular Sciences, City Hospital, Birmingham B18 7QH, UK.
Healthcare (Basel). 2016 Jan 14;4(1):10. doi: 10.3390/healthcare4010010.
This article describes the theoretical and pragmatic development of a patient-centred intervention for patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). Theoretical models (Common Sense Model, Necessity-Concerns Framework), clinical frameworks, and AF patient feedback contributed to the design of a one-off hour-long behaviour-change intervention package. Intervention materials consisted of a DVD, educational booklet, diary and worksheet, which were patient-centred and easy to administer. The intervention was evaluated within a randomised controlled trial. Several "active theoretical ingredients" were identified (for e.g., where patients believed their medication was less harmful they spent more time within the therapeutic range (TTR), with general harm scores predicting TTR at 6 months). Allowing for social comparison and adopting behaviour change techniques enabled accurate patient understanding of their condition and medication. The process of developing the intervention using theory-derived content and evaluation tools allowed a greater understanding of the mechanisms by which this intervention was successful. Alleviating concerns about treatment medication by educating patients can help to improve adherence. This process of intervention development could be adopted for a range of chronic illnesses and treatments. Critical elements should include the use of: (1) clinical guidelines; (2) appropriate theoretical models; (3) patient input; and (4) appropriate evaluation tools.
本文描述了一种针对心房颤动(AF)患者的以患者为中心的干预措施的理论和实践发展。理论模型(常识模型、必要性-关注框架)、临床框架以及AF患者的反馈为一个时长一小时的一次性行为改变干预方案的设计提供了帮助。干预材料包括一张DVD、一本教育手册、一本日记和一份工作表,这些材料以患者为中心且易于实施。该干预措施在一项随机对照试验中进行了评估。确定了几个“有效的理论要素”(例如,当患者认为他们的药物危害较小时,他们在治疗范围内(TTR)的时间更长,一般危害评分可预测6个月时的TTR)。进行社会比较并采用行为改变技巧能使患者准确了解自己的病情和药物。利用理论衍生的内容和评估工具来开发干预措施的过程,有助于更深入地理解该干预措施成功的机制。通过对患者进行教育来减轻他们对治疗药物的担忧,有助于提高依从性。这种干预措施的开发过程可应用于一系列慢性疾病和治疗。关键要素应包括使用:(1)临床指南;(2)适当的理论模型;(3)患者的意见;以及(4)适当的评估工具。