Henry Christine E, Wang Ying-Ying, Yang Qi, Hoang Thuy, Chattopadhyay Sumon, Hoen Timothy, Ensign Laura M, Nunn Kenetta L, Schroeder Holly, McCallen Justin, Moench Thomas, Cone Richard, Roffler Steve R, Lai Samuel K
UNC/NCSU Joint Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of North Carolina - Chapel Hill, 125 Mason Farm Road, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA.
Department of Biophysics, Johns Hopkins University, 3400 North Charles Street, Baltimore, MD 21218, USA.
Acta Biomater. 2016 Oct 1;43:61-70. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2016.07.019. Epub 2016 Jul 14.
Antibodies that specifically bind polyethylene glycol (PEG) can lead to rapid elimination of PEGylated therapeutics from the systemic circulation. We have recently shown that virus-binding IgG can immobilize viruses in mucus via multiple low-affinity crosslinks between IgG and mucins. However, it remains unclear whether anti-PEG antibodies in mucus may also alter the penetration and consequently biodistribution of PEGylated nanoparticles delivered to mucosal surfaces. We found that both anti-PEG IgG and IgM can readily bind nanoparticles that were densely coated with PEG polymer to minimize adhesive interactions with mucus constituents. Addition of anti-PEG IgG and IgM into mouse cervicovaginal mucus resulted in extensive trapping of mucus-penetrating PEGylated nanoparticles, with the fraction of mobile particles reduced from over 95% to only 34% and 7% with anti-PEG IgG and IgM, respectively. Surprisingly, we did not observe significant agglutination induced by either antibody, suggesting that particle immobilization is caused by adhesive crosslinks between mucin fibers and IgG or IgM bound to individual nanoparticles. Importantly, addition of corresponding control antibodies did not slow the PEGylated nanoparticles, confirming anti-PEG antibodies specifically bound to and trapped the PEGylated nanoparticles. Finally, we showed that trapped PEGylated nanoparticles remained largely in the luminal mucus layer of the mouse vagina even when delivered in hypotonic formulations that caused untrapped particles to be drawn by the flow of water (advection) through mucus all the way to the epithelial surface. These results underscore the potential importance of elucidating mucosal anti-PEG immune responses for PEGylated therapeutics and biomaterials applied to mucosal surfaces.
PEG, generally considered a 'stealth' polymer, is broadly used to improve the circulation times and therapeutic efficacy of nanomedicines. Nevertheless, there is increasing scientific evidence that demonstrates both animals and humans can generate PEG-specific antibodies. Here, we show that anti-PEG IgG and IgM can specifically immobilize otherwise freely diffusing PEG-coated nanoparticles in fresh vaginal mucus gel ex vivo by crosslinking nanoparticles to the mucin mesh, and consequently prevent PEG-coated nanoparticles from accessing the vaginal epithelium in vivo. Given the increasing use of PEG coatings to enhance nanoparticle penetration of mucosal barriers, our findings demonstrate that anti-PEG immunity may be a potential concern not only for systemic drug delivery but also for mucosal drug delivery.
特异性结合聚乙二醇(PEG)的抗体可导致聚乙二醇化治疗药物从体循环中快速清除。我们最近发现,病毒结合性IgG可通过IgG与粘蛋白之间的多个低亲和力交联将病毒固定在黏液中。然而,尚不清楚黏液中的抗PEG抗体是否也会改变递送至黏膜表面的聚乙二醇化纳米颗粒的渗透情况,进而影响其生物分布。我们发现,抗PEG IgG和IgM都能轻易结合被PEG聚合物密集包被的纳米颗粒,以尽量减少与黏液成分的黏附相互作用。将抗PEG IgG和IgM添加到小鼠宫颈阴道黏液中会导致穿透黏液的聚乙二醇化纳米颗粒被大量截留,可移动颗粒的比例分别从超过95%降至抗PEG IgG时的34%和抗PEG IgM时的7%。令人惊讶的是,我们未观察到任何一种抗体诱导的明显凝集现象,这表明颗粒固定是由粘蛋白纤维与结合在单个纳米颗粒上的IgG或IgM之间的黏附交联引起的。重要的是,添加相应的对照抗体并不会减缓聚乙二醇化纳米颗粒的移动,这证实了抗PEG抗体特异性结合并截留了聚乙二醇化纳米颗粒。最后,我们表明,即使以低渗制剂形式递送,导致未截留的颗粒被水流(平流)通过黏液一直吸引到上皮表面,截留的聚乙二醇化纳米颗粒仍主要留在小鼠阴道的管腔黏液层中。这些结果强调了阐明黏膜抗PEG免疫反应对于应用于黏膜表面的聚乙二醇化治疗药物和生物材料的潜在重要性。
PEG通常被认为是一种“隐形”聚合物,广泛用于延长纳米药物的循环时间和提高治疗效果。然而,越来越多的科学证据表明,动物和人类都能产生PEG特异性抗体。在此,我们表明,抗PEG IgG和IgM可通过将纳米颗粒交联到粘蛋白网中,在体外新鲜阴道黏液凝胶中特异性固定原本可自由扩散移动的PEG包被纳米颗粒,从而在体内阻止PEG包被纳米颗粒接触阴道上皮。鉴于越来越多地使用PEG包被来增强纳米颗粒对黏膜屏障的穿透能力,我们的研究结果表明,抗PEG免疫不仅可能是全身给药的一个潜在问题,也是黏膜给药的潜在问题。