Claeys Kimberly C, Zasowski Evan J, Casapao Anthony M, Lagnf Abdalhamid M, Nagel Jerod L, Nguyen Cynthia T, Hallesy Jessica A, Compton Mathew T, Kaye Keith S, Levine Donald P, Davis Susan L, Rybak Michael J
Anti-Infective Research Laboratory, Eugene Applebaum College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan, USA Department of Pharmacy Practice, Eugene Applebaum College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan, USA.
Department of Pharmacy, University of Michigan Hospital and Health Centers, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2016 Sep 23;60(10):5841-8. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00227-16. Print 2016 Oct.
Vancomycin remains the mainstay treatment for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) bloodstream infections (BSIs) despite increased treatment failures. Daptomycin has been shown to improve clinical outcomes in patients with BSIs caused by MRSA isolates with vancomycin MICs of >1 mg/liter, but these studies relied on automated testing systems. We evaluated the outcomes of BSIs caused by MRSA isolates for which vancomycin MICs were determined by standard broth microdilution (BMD). A retrospective, matched cohort of patients with MRSA BSIs treated with vancomycin or daptomycin from January 2010 to March 2015 was completed. Patients were matched using propensity-adjusted logistic regression, which included age, Pitt bacteremia score, primary BSI source, and hospital of care. The primary endpoint was clinical failure, which was a composite endpoint of the following metrics: 30-day mortality, bacteremia with a duration of ≥7 days, or a change in anti-MRSA therapy due to persistent or worsening signs or symptoms. Secondary endpoints included MRSA-attributable mortality and the number of days of MRSA bacteremia. Independent predictors of failure were determined through conditional backwards-stepwise logistic regression with vancomycin BMD MIC forced into the model. A total of 262 patients were matched. Clinical failure was significantly higher in the vancomycin cohort than in the daptomycin cohort (45.0% versus 29.0%; P = 0.007). All-cause 30-day mortality was significantly higher in the vancomycin cohort (15.3% versus 6.1%; P = 0.024). These outcomes remained significant when stratified by vancomycin BMD MIC. There was no significant difference in the length of MRSA bacteremia. Variables independently associated with treatment failure included vancomycin therapy (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 2.16, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.24 to 3.76), intensive care unit admission (aOR = 2.46, 95% CI = 1.34 to 4.54), and infective endocarditis as the primary source (aOR = 2.33, 95% CI = 1.16 to 4.68). Treatment of MRSA BSIs with daptomycin was associated with reduced clinical failure and 30-day mortality; these findings were independent of vancomycin BMD MIC.
尽管治疗失败的情况有所增加,但万古霉素仍然是耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA)血流感染(BSIs)的主要治疗药物。已证明达托霉素可改善由万古霉素最低抑菌浓度(MIC)>1毫克/升的MRSA分离株引起的BSIs患者的临床结局,但这些研究依赖于自动化检测系统。我们评估了通过标准肉汤微量稀释法(BMD)测定万古霉素MIC的MRSA分离株引起的BSIs的结局。完成了一项对2010年1月至2015年3月期间接受万古霉素或达托霉素治疗的MRSA BSIs患者进行回顾性匹配队列研究。使用倾向调整逻辑回归对患者进行匹配,该回归包括年龄、皮特菌血症评分、原发性BSI来源和治疗医院。主要终点是临床失败,它是以下指标的综合终点:30天死亡率、持续时间≥7天的菌血症,或由于持续或恶化的体征或症状而改变抗MRSA治疗。次要终点包括MRSA归因死亡率和MRSA菌血症天数。通过将万古霉素BMD MIC强制纳入模型的条件向后逐步逻辑回归确定失败的独立预测因素。总共匹配了262名患者。万古霉素队列中的临床失败率显著高于达托霉素队列(45.0%对29.0%;P = 0.007)。万古霉素队列中的全因30天死亡率显著更高(15.3%对6.1%;P = 0.024)。按万古霉素BMD MIC分层时,这些结局仍然显著。MRSA菌血症的持续时间没有显著差异。与治疗失败独立相关的变量包括万古霉素治疗(调整后的优势比[aOR]=2.16,95%置信区间[CI]=1.24至3.76)、重症监护病房入院(aOR = 2.46,95% CI = 1.34至4.54),以及感染性心内膜炎作为主要来源(aOR = 2.33,95% CI = 1.16至4.68)。用达托霉素治疗MRSA BSIs与降低临床失败率和30天死亡率相关;这些发现与万古霉素BMD MIC无关。