Suppr超能文献

美国和法国急诊科急性肾绞痛的治疗:急性疼痛管理中的模拟病例与真实病例

Treatment of Acute Renal Colic in US and French EDs: Simulated Cases and Real Cases in Acute Pain Management.

作者信息

Bounes Vincent, Vallé Baptiste, Concina François, Lauque Dominique, Ducassé Jean-Louis, Edlow Jonathan A

机构信息

Pôle Médecine d'Urgence, Hôpital Universitaire de Purpan, Toulouse 31059, Cedex 9, France; Unité de Recherche de Pharmacoépidémiologie, INSERM UMR 1027 Toulouse, France.

Pôle Médecine d'Urgence, Hôpital Universitaire de Purpan, Toulouse 31059, Cedex 9, France.

出版信息

Am J Emerg Med. 2016 Oct;34(10):1955-1958. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2016.06.107. Epub 2016 Jul 4.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To assess the prescribing patterns in acute renal colic in emergency departments in US and France, by comparing physicians' intended prescription practices with actual prescription data in a sample of emergency practitioners.

METHODS

Pharmaco-epidemiological international study in two phases. First, we surveyed emergency physicians in US and France as to what analgesics they would use for simulated cases of renal colic. We then conducted a retrospective review of actual cases of emergency department patients with pain scores ≥6/10 with acute renal colic during a period of 6 months before the survey. We compared nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and opioids used for pain treatment in the two groups, and the differences between the two countries.

RESULTS

One hundred six prescribers and 100 patients were included in the study. Comparison between simulated and real cases showed that NSAIDs and opioids were less frequently prescribed in real life (78% vs 99% and 51% vs 100% respectively). Morphine was the most prescribed opioid (96% of simulated cases and 34% of real ones). Acetaminophen use was increased in real life cases (58% vs 0%). Concerning the differences between countries, US physicians are more likely to administer morphine (64% vs 38%) and French physicians NSAIDs (88% vs 68%). The NSAIDs used are ketorolac in the United States (94% of simulated cases vs 64%) and ketoprofen in France (94% and 88% respectively).

DISCUSSION

We showed clear differences between intended and real analgesic prescription practices for patients suffering from renal colic. Some differences exist for pain perceptions and treatments between US and France.

摘要

目的

通过比较美国和法国急诊医生的预期处方行为与实际处方数据,评估美法两国急诊科急性肾绞痛的处方模式。

方法

分两个阶段进行的药物流行病学国际研究。首先,我们调查了美国和法国的急诊医生,询问他们在模拟肾绞痛病例中会使用哪些镇痛药。然后,我们对调查前6个月期间急诊科疼痛评分≥6/10的急性肾绞痛患者的实际病例进行了回顾性研究。我们比较了两组用于疼痛治疗的非甾体抗炎药(NSAIDs)和阿片类药物,以及两国之间的差异。

结果

该研究纳入了106名开处方者和100名患者。模拟病例与实际病例的比较显示,现实生活中NSAIDs和阿片类药物的处方频率较低(分别为78%对99%和51%对100%)。吗啡是处方最多的阿片类药物(模拟病例的96%和实际病例的34%)。对乙酰氨基酚在实际病例中的使用有所增加(58%对0%)。关于国家间的差异,美国医生更有可能使用吗啡(64%对38%),而法国医生更倾向于使用NSAIDs(88%对68%)。美国使用的NSAIDs是酮咯酸(模拟病例的94%对64%),法国使用的是酮洛芬(分别为94%和88%)。

讨论

我们发现肾绞痛患者预期的和实际的镇痛药处方行为之间存在明显差异。美国和法国在疼痛认知和治疗方面存在一些差异。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验