Garner Paul, Hopewell Sally, Chandler Jackie, MacLehose Harriet, Schünemann Holger J, Akl Elie A, Beyene Joseph, Chang Stephanie, Churchill Rachel, Dearness Karin, Guyatt Gordon, Lefebvre Carol, Liles Beth, Marshall Rachel, Martínez García Laura, Mavergames Chris, Nasser Mona, Qaseem Amir, Sampson Margaret, Soares-Weiser Karla, Takwoingi Yemisi, Thabane Lehana, Trivella Marialena, Tugwell Peter, Welsh Emma, Wilson Ed C, Schünemann Holger J
Cochrane Infectious Diseases Group, Department of Clinical Sciences, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool L3 5QA, UK
Oxford Clinical Trials Research Unit, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
BMJ. 2016 Jul 20;354:i3507. doi: 10.1136/bmj.i3507.
Updating of systematic reviews is generally more efficient than starting all over again when new evidence emerges, but to date there has been no clear guidance on how to do this. This guidance helps authors of systematic reviews, commissioners, and editors decide when to update a systematic review, and then how to go about updating the review.
当新证据出现时,更新系统评价通常比从头开始更有效,但迄今为止,对于如何进行更新尚无明确的指导意见。本指南有助于系统评价的作者、委托方和编辑决定何时更新系统评价,以及随后如何着手更新该评价。