Suppr超能文献

何时以及如何更新系统评价:共识与清单

When and how to update systematic reviews: consensus and checklist.

作者信息

Garner Paul, Hopewell Sally, Chandler Jackie, MacLehose Harriet, Schünemann Holger J, Akl Elie A, Beyene Joseph, Chang Stephanie, Churchill Rachel, Dearness Karin, Guyatt Gordon, Lefebvre Carol, Liles Beth, Marshall Rachel, Martínez García Laura, Mavergames Chris, Nasser Mona, Qaseem Amir, Sampson Margaret, Soares-Weiser Karla, Takwoingi Yemisi, Thabane Lehana, Trivella Marialena, Tugwell Peter, Welsh Emma, Wilson Ed C, Schünemann Holger J

机构信息

Cochrane Infectious Diseases Group, Department of Clinical Sciences, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool L3 5QA, UK

Oxford Clinical Trials Research Unit, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.

出版信息

BMJ. 2016 Jul 20;354:i3507. doi: 10.1136/bmj.i3507.

Abstract

Updating of systematic reviews is generally more efficient than starting all over again when new evidence emerges, but to date there has been no clear guidance on how to do this. This guidance helps authors of systematic reviews, commissioners, and editors decide when to update a systematic review, and then how to go about updating the review.

摘要

当新证据出现时,更新系统评价通常比从头开始更有效,但迄今为止,对于如何进行更新尚无明确的指导意见。本指南有助于系统评价的作者、委托方和编辑决定何时更新系统评价,以及随后如何着手更新该评价。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2cd5/4955793/8fee6022633c/garp030756.f1_default.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验