• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

何时以及如何更新系统评价：共识与清单

When and how to update systematic reviews: consensus and checklist.

作者信息

Garner Paul, Hopewell Sally, Chandler Jackie, MacLehose Harriet, Schünemann Holger J, Akl Elie A, Beyene Joseph, Chang Stephanie, Churchill Rachel, Dearness Karin, Guyatt Gordon, Lefebvre Carol, Liles Beth, Marshall Rachel, Martínez García Laura, Mavergames Chris, Nasser Mona, Qaseem Amir, Sampson Margaret, Soares-Weiser Karla, Takwoingi Yemisi, Thabane Lehana, Trivella Marialena, Tugwell Peter, Welsh Emma, Wilson Ed C, Schünemann Holger J

机构信息

Cochrane Infectious Diseases Group, Department of Clinical Sciences, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool L3 5QA, UK

Oxford Clinical Trials Research Unit, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.

出版信息

BMJ. 2016 Jul 20;354:i3507. doi: 10.1136/bmj.i3507.

DOI:10.1136/bmj.i3507
PMID:27443385
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4955793/
Abstract

Updating of systematic reviews is generally more efficient than starting all over again when new evidence emerges, but to date there has been no clear guidance on how to do this. This guidance helps authors of systematic reviews, commissioners, and editors decide when to update a systematic review, and then how to go about updating the review.

摘要

当新证据出现时，更新系统评价通常比从头开始更有效，但迄今为止，对于如何进行更新尚无明确的指导意见。本指南有助于系统评价的作者、委托方和编辑决定何时更新系统评价，以及随后如何着手更新该评价。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2cd5/4955793/8fee6022633c/garp030756.f1_default.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2cd5/4955793/8fee6022633c/garp030756.f1_default.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2cd5/4955793/8fee6022633c/garp030756.f1_default.jpg

相似文献

1
When and how to update systematic reviews: consensus and checklist.何时以及如何更新系统评价：共识与清单
BMJ. 2016 Jul 20;354:i3507. doi: 10.1136/bmj.i3507.
2
RECORDS: improved Reporting of montE CarlO RaDiation transport Studies.记录：蒙特卡罗辐射传输研究的改进报告
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2018 Jul 15;101(4):792-793. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2018.04.003. Epub 2018 Apr 14.
3
AHRQ series on complex intervention systematic reviews-paper 6: PRISMA-CI extension statement and checklist.美国医疗保健研究与质量局（AHRQ）关于复杂干预系统评价的系列文章——第6篇：PRISMA-CI扩展声明及清单
J Clin Epidemiol. 2017 Oct;90:43-50. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2017.06.016. Epub 2017 Jul 15.
4
The PRISMA statement: a guideline for systematic reviews and meta-analyses.PRISMA声明：系统评价与Meta分析指南
J Pediatr Health Care. 2011 Jan-Feb;25(1):1-2. doi: 10.1016/j.pedhc.2010.09.006.
5
PRISMA.系统评价与Meta分析的首选报告项目
Nurs Res. 2010 Jul-Aug;59(4):233. doi: 10.1097/NNR.0b013e3181ea2fca.
6
The PRISMA extension statement for reporting of systematic reviews incorporating network meta-analyses of health care interventions: checklist and explanations.PRISMA 扩展声明用于报告包含健康保健干预措施网络荟萃分析的系统评价：清单和说明。
Ann Intern Med. 2015 Jun 2;162(11):777-84. doi: 10.7326/M14-2385.
7
Publishing systematic reviews in ophthalmology: new guidance for authors.眼科领域系统评价的发表：给作者的新指南
Ophthalmology. 2014 Feb;121(2):438-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2013.10.003.
8
The PRISMA extension for network meta-analysis: bringing clarity and guidance to the reporting of systematic reviews incorporating network meta-analyses.网络Meta分析的PRISMA扩展：为纳入网络Meta分析的系统评价报告带来清晰性和指导
Ann Intern Med. 2015 Jun 2;162(11):797-8. doi: 10.7326/M15-0930.
9
[The PRISMA statement extension for systematic reviews incorporating network meta-analysis: PRISMA-NMA].[纳入网状Meta分析的系统评价的PRISMA声明扩展版：PRISMA-NMA]
Med Clin (Barc). 2016 Sep 16;147(6):262-6. doi: 10.1016/j.medcli.2016.02.025. Epub 2016 Mar 31.
10
[PRISMA declaration: a proposal to improve the publication of systematic reviews and meta-analyses].[PRISMA声明：一项改善系统评价和Meta分析报告质量的建议]
Med Clin (Barc). 2010 Oct 9;135(11):507-11. doi: 10.1016/j.medcli.2010.01.015. Epub 2010 Mar 5.

引用本文的文献

1
Aspartate aminotransferase-to-platelet ratio index (APRI) for staging of fibrosis in adults with chronic hepatitis C.用于慢性丙型肝炎成人患者肝纤维化分期的天冬氨酸氨基转移酶与血小板比值指数（APRI）
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Aug 4;8(8):CD014222. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014222.
2
Housing First for Youth Who Experience Homelessness: A Systematic Review.为经历无家可归的青年提供优先住房：一项系统评价。
Urban Aff Rev Thousand Oaks Calif. 2025 Feb 24;61(5):1381-1415. doi: 10.1177/10780874251314838. eCollection 2025 Sep.
3
Efficacy and safety of micro-fragmented adipose tissue combined with knee arthroscopy in the treatment of knee osteoarthritis: a systematic review.

本文引用的文献

1
Corticosteroids for managing tuberculous meningitis.用于治疗结核性脑膜炎的皮质类固醇。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Apr 28;4(4):CD002244. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002244.pub4.
2
Interpreting GRADE's levels of certainty or quality of the evidence: GRADE for statisticians, considering review information size or less emphasis on imprecision?解读GRADE证据的确定性水平或质量：面向统计学家的GRADE，是考虑综述信息规模还是较少强调不精确性？
J Clin Epidemiol. 2016 Jul;75:6-15. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2016.03.018. Epub 2016 Apr 6.
3
Cluster Randomised Trials in Cochrane Reviews: Evaluation of Methodological and Reporting Practice.
微片段化脂肪组织联合膝关节镜治疗膝关节骨关节炎的疗效与安全性：一项系统评价
J Orthop Surg Res. 2025 Jul 12;20(1):646. doi: 10.1186/s13018-025-06006-5.
4
Prosthesis survival situation and complications following total hip arthroplasty in hemophilic patients: a systematic review.血友病患者全髋关节置换术后假体存活情况及并发症：一项系统评价
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2025 Jul 9;26(1):672. doi: 10.1186/s12891-025-08919-y.
5
Validation of The Umbrella Collaboration for Tertiary Evidence Synthesis in Geriatrics: Mixed Methods Study.老年医学三级证据综合的伞状合作验证：混合方法研究
JMIR Form Res. 2025 Jul 8;9:e75215. doi: 10.2196/75215.
6
Identifying optimal primary prevention interventions for major cardiovascular disease events and all-cause mortality: a systematic review and hierarchical network meta-analysis of RCTs.确定主要心血管疾病事件和全因死亡率的最佳一级预防干预措施：一项随机对照试验的系统评价和分层网络荟萃分析
Health Technol Assess. 2025 Jul;29(37):1-65. doi: 10.3310/RLDH7432.
7
Prevalence of symptom exaggeration among North American independent medical evaluation examinees: A systematic review of observational studies.北美独立医学评估受检者中症状夸大的患病率：观察性研究的系统评价
PLoS One. 2025 Jun 25;20(6):e0324684. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0324684. eCollection 2025.
8
Readdressing the Ongoing Challenge of Missing Data in Youth Ecological Momentary Assessment Studies: Meta-Analysis Update.重新审视青少年生态瞬时评估研究中持续存在的数据缺失挑战：荟萃分析更新
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Apr 30;27:e65710. doi: 10.2196/65710.
9
The efficacy of total hip arthroplasty in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus: a systematic review and meta-analysis.全髋关节置换术治疗系统性红斑狼疮患者的疗效：一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2025 Apr 16;20(1):381. doi: 10.1186/s13018-025-05791-3.
10
Towards the Identification of Patients' Needs for Promoting Robotics and Allied Digital Technologies in Rehabilitation: A Systematic Review.识别患者对康复中推广机器人技术及相关数字技术的需求：一项系统综述
Healthcare (Basel). 2025 Apr 4;13(7):828. doi: 10.3390/healthcare13070828.
Cochrane系统评价中的整群随机试验：方法学与报告规范评估
PLoS One. 2016 Mar 16;11(3):e0151818. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0151818. eCollection 2016.
4
Adhesively bonded versus non-bonded amalgam restorations for dental caries.用于龋齿的粘结式与非粘结式银汞合金修复体
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Mar 8;3(3):CD007517. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007517.pub3.
5
Different dosage schedules for reducing cardiotoxicity in people with cancer receiving anthracycline chemotherapy.在接受蒽环类化疗的癌症患者中降低心脏毒性的不同给药方案。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Mar 3;3(3):CD005008. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005008.pub4.
6
Oral iron supplements for children in malaria-endemic areas.疟疾流行地区儿童的口服铁补充剂
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Feb 27;2(2):CD006589. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006589.pub4.
7
Qualitative and mixed methods in systematic reviews.系统评价中的定性和混合方法。
Syst Rev. 2015 Dec 15;4:181. doi: 10.1186/s13643-015-0151-y.
8
ROBIS: A new tool to assess risk of bias in systematic reviews was developed.ROBIS：一种用于评估系统评价中偏倚风险的新工具被开发出来。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2016 Jan;69:225-34. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2015.06.005. Epub 2015 Jun 16.
9
A population-based, multifaceted strategy to implement antenatal corticosteroid treatment versus standard care for the reduction of neonatal mortality due to preterm birth in low-income and middle-income countries: the ACT cluster-randomised trial.一项基于人群的、多方面的策略，旨在实施产前皮质类固醇治疗与标准护理，以降低低收入和中等收入国家因早产导致的新生儿死亡率：ACT 整群随机试验。
Lancet. 2015 Feb 14;385(9968):629-639. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)61651-2. Epub 2014 Oct 15.
10
Antibiotic prophylaxis versus no prophylaxis for preventing infection after cesarean section.剖宫产术后预防感染：抗生素预防与不预防的对比
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Oct 28;2014(10):CD007482. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007482.pub3.