Paula Luis Felipe, Wellman Tyler J, Winkler Tilo, Spieth Peter M, Güldner Andreas, Venegas Jose G, Gama de Abreu Marcelo, Carvalho Alysson R, Vidal Melo Marcos F
Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
Laboratory of Respiration Physiology, Carlos Chagas Filho Biophysics Institute, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
J Appl Physiol (1985). 2016 Dec 1;121(6):1335-1347. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00861.2015. Epub 2016 Jul 21.
Parenchymal strain is a key determinant of lung injury produced by mechanical ventilation. However, imaging estimates of volumetric tidal strain (ε = regional tidal volume/reference volume) present substantial conceptual differences in reference volume computation and consideration of tidally recruited lung. We compared current and new methods to estimate tidal volumetric strains with computed tomography, and quantified the effect of tidal volume (V) and positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) on strain estimates. Eight supine pigs were ventilated with V = 6 and 12 ml/kg and PEEP = 0, 6, and 12 cmHO. End-expiratory and end-inspiratory scans were analyzed in eight regions of interest along the ventral-dorsal axis. Regional reference volumes were computed at end-expiration (with/without correction of regional V for intratidal recruitment) and at resting lung volume (PEEP = 0) corrected for intratidal and PEEP-derived recruitment. All strain estimates demonstrated vertical heterogeneity with the largest tidal strains in middependent regions (P < 0.01). Maximal strains for distinct estimates occurred at different lung regions and were differently affected by V-PEEP conditions. Values consistent with lung injury and inflammation were reached regionally, even when global measurements were below critical levels. Strains increased with V and were larger in middependent than in nondependent lung regions. PEEP reduced tidal-strain estimates referenced to end-expiratory lung volumes, although it did not affect strains referenced to resting lung volume. These estimates of tidal strains in normal lungs point to middependent lung regions as those at risk for ventilator-induced lung injury. The different conditions and topography at which maximal strain estimates occur allow for testing the importance of each estimate for lung injury.
实质应变是机械通气所致肺损伤的关键决定因素。然而,容积性潮气量应变(ε = 局部潮气量/参考容积)的影像学评估在参考容积计算和对潮气量募集肺组织的考虑方面存在显著的概念差异。我们用计算机断层扫描比较了当前和新的方法来估计潮气量应变,并量化了潮气量(V)和呼气末正压(PEEP)对应变估计值的影响。八只仰卧位猪分别采用V = 6和12 ml/kg以及PEEP = 0、6和12 cmH₂O进行通气。在沿腹背轴的八个感兴趣区域分析呼气末和吸气末扫描图像。在呼气末(对潮气量募集进行/不进行局部V校正)以及对潮气量募集和PEEP诱导的募集进行校正后的静息肺容积(PEEP = 0)时计算局部参考容积。所有应变估计值均显示出垂直异质性,中依赖区域的潮气量应变最大(P < 0.01)。不同估计值的最大应变出现在不同的肺区域,并且受V - PEEP条件的影响不同。即使整体测量值低于临界水平,局部也会出现与肺损伤和炎症一致的值。应变随V增加,且中依赖肺区域的应变大于非依赖肺区域。PEEP降低了以呼气末肺容积为参考的潮气量应变估计值,尽管它不影响以静息肺容积为参考的应变值。这些正常肺组织中潮气量应变的估计表明,中依赖肺区域是发生呼吸机诱导性肺损伤的风险区域。最大应变估计值出现的不同条件和部位有助于检验每种估计值对肺损伤的重要性。