Golay Philippe, Basterrechea Louis, Conus Philippe, Bonsack Charles
Department of Psychiatry, Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV), Lausanne, Switzerland.
PLoS One. 2016 Aug 2;11(8):e0160360. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0160360. eCollection 2016.
The Health of the Nation Outcome Scales (HoNOS) is a widely used measure of health and social functioning of people with mental illness. The goals of this study were to verify the internal validity of the one factor and several four-factor scoring structures and to evaluate the predictive validity of HoNOS items with regards to duration of hospitalization, probability of readmission in the following year and time before readmission. 6175 hospital stays at the department of psychiatry of Lausanne University Hospital were screened and the first HoNOS of each patient was taken into account (N = 2722). Data were analyzed through Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) and the predictive validity of HoNOS items was evaluated with two approaches: item level regressions and latent class analysis (LCA). CFA indicated that the suggested factor structures were not supported by the data. Predictive validity of the 12 items was weak but LCA revealed five distinct and meaningful profiles that were related to length of stay or readmission. HoNOS may be more adapted to the evaluation of patients case-mix rather than to the individual level and concepts such as predictive validity may be more appropriate than internal validity to guide its use.
《国民健康结果量表》(HoNOS)是一种广泛用于衡量精神疾病患者健康状况和社会功能的工具。本研究的目的是验证单因素和几种四因素计分结构的内部效度,并评估HoNOS项目在住院时间、次年再入院概率以及再入院前时间方面的预测效度。对洛桑大学医院精神科的6175次住院进行了筛查,并考虑了每位患者的首次HoNOS评分(N = 2722)。通过验证性因素分析(CFA)对数据进行分析,并采用两种方法评估HoNOS项目的预测效度:项目水平回归和潜在类别分析(LCA)。CFA表明,所建议的因素结构未得到数据支持。12个项目的预测效度较弱,但LCA揭示了与住院时间或再入院相关的五个不同且有意义的概况。HoNOS可能更适用于评估患者病例组合,而不是个体层面,并且预测效度等概念可能比内部效度更适合指导其使用。