Del Prato S, Patel S, Crowe S, von Eynatten M
University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
Boehringer Ingelheim Ltd UK, Bracknell, Berkshire, UK.
Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis. 2016 Oct;26(10):886-92. doi: 10.1016/j.numecd.2016.06.015. Epub 2016 Jul 1.
We aimed to determine if patient baseline characteristics affect responses to linagliptin and identify relevant predictors of glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) reduction in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM).
Data were pooled from three 24-week, placebo-controlled trials of similar design (linagliptin, n = 1651; placebo, n = 607). Patients were categorized according to baseline characteristics: age, T2DM duration, gender, body mass index (BMI), Homeostasis Model Assessment of Insulin Resistance (HOMA-IR), and metabolic syndrome (MetS). Changes from baseline in HbA1c after 24 weeks were assessed with analysis of covariance (ANCOVA). The proportion of patients with baseline HbA1c >7% achieving HbA1c of ≤7% at week 24 were evaluated. Independent predictors of HbA1c response with linagliptin were analyzed in a multivariate analysis with ANCOVA. Linagliptin treatment led to significant mean (SE) placebo-corrected reductions from baseline in HbA1c across all subgroups (-0.42% [±0.11] to -0.79% [0.08]; all p < 0.001). Within subgroups, HbA1c reduction was more pronounced in patients without MetS (-0.74% [0.06]; treatment interaction p = 0.0489). The proportion of patients with baseline HbA1c >7% achieving a target HbA1c ≤7% was greater with linagliptin versus placebo (30.2% vs 11.5%; odds ratio 3.82; 95% CI 2.82 to 5.17; p < 0.001). Characteristics significantly predicting HbA1c reductions after 24 weeks were fasting plasma glucose and race (both p < 0.05).
This post-hoc analysis supports that linagliptin achieved clinically meaningful improvements in hyperglycemia in patients with diverse clinical characteristics. These improvements were more pronounced in patients without MetS.
我们旨在确定患者的基线特征是否会影响利格列汀的疗效,并识别2型糖尿病(T2DM)患者糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)降低的相关预测因素。
数据来自三项设计相似的24周安慰剂对照试验(利格列汀组,n = 1651;安慰剂组,n = 607)。患者根据基线特征进行分类:年龄、T2DM病程、性别、体重指数(BMI)、胰岛素抵抗稳态模型评估(HOMA-IR)和代谢综合征(MetS)。采用协方差分析(ANCOVA)评估24周后HbA1c相对于基线的变化。评估了基线HbA1c>7%的患者在第24周时HbA1c≤7%的比例。在ANCOVA的多变量分析中分析了利格列汀治疗后HbA1c反应的独立预测因素。利格列汀治疗导致所有亚组的HbA1c相对于基线均出现显著的平均(SE)安慰剂校正降低(-0.42%[±0.11]至-0.79%[0.08];所有p<0.001)。在亚组中,无MetS的患者HbA1c降低更为明显(-0.74%[0.06];治疗交互作用p = 0.0489)。与安慰剂相比,基线HbA1c>7%的患者达到目标HbA1c≤7%的比例在利格列汀组更高(30.2%对11.5%;优势比3.82;95%CI 2.82至5.17;p<0.001)。显著预测24周后HbA1c降低的特征为空腹血糖和种族(均p<0.05)。
这项事后分析支持利格列汀在具有不同临床特征的患者中实现了临床上有意义的高血糖改善。这些改善在无MetS的患者中更为明显。