Li Hongjian, Leung Kwong-Sak, Wong Man-Hon, Ballester Pedro J
Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, New Territories, Hong Kong.
European Bioinformatics Institute, Wellcome Trust Genome Campus, Hinxton, Cambridge, CB10 1SD, UK.
Mol Inform. 2015 Feb;34(2-3):115-26. doi: 10.1002/minf.201400132. Epub 2015 Feb 12.
There is a growing body of evidence showing that machine learning regression results in more accurate structure-based prediction of protein-ligand binding affinity. Docking methods that aim at optimizing the affinity of ligands for a target rely on how accurate their predicted ranking is. However, despite their proven advantages, machine-learning scoring functions are still not widely applied. This seems to be due to insufficient understanding of their properties and the lack of user-friendly software implementing them. Here we present a study where the accuracy of AutoDock Vina, arguably the most commonly-used docking software, is strongly improved by following a machine learning approach. We also analyse the factors that are responsible for this improvement and their generality. Most importantly, with the help of a proposed benchmark, we demonstrate that this improvement will be larger as more data becomes available for training Random Forest models, as regression models implying additive functional forms do not improve with more training data. We discuss how the latter opens the door to new opportunities in scoring function development. In order to facilitate the translation of this advance to enhance structure-based molecular design, we provide software to directly re-score Vina-generated poses and thus strongly improve their predicted binding affinity. The software is available at http://istar.cse.cuhk.edu.hk/rf-score-3.tgz and http://crcm. marseille.inserm.fr/fileadmin/rf-score-3.tgz.
越来越多的证据表明,机器学习回归能够更准确地基于结构预测蛋白质-配体结合亲和力。旨在优化配体与靶标亲和力的对接方法依赖于其预测排名的准确性。然而,尽管机器学习评分函数已被证明具有优势,但仍未得到广泛应用。这似乎是由于对其特性了解不足以及缺乏实现它们的用户友好型软件。在此,我们展示了一项研究,通过采用机器学习方法,显著提高了可以说是最常用的对接软件AutoDock Vina的准确性。我们还分析了促成这种改进的因素及其普遍性。最重要的是,借助一个提议的基准,我们证明随着有更多数据可用于训练随机森林模型,这种改进会更大,因为暗示加性函数形式的回归模型不会随着更多训练数据而改进。我们讨论了后者如何为评分函数开发带来新机遇。为了促进将这一进展转化以增强基于结构的分子设计,我们提供了软件来直接对Vina生成的构象进行重新评分,从而显著提高其预测的结合亲和力。该软件可在http://istar.cse.cuhk.edu.hk/rf-score-3.tgz和http://crcm.marseille.inserm.fr/fileadmin/rf-score-3.tgz获取。