Jeffries Howard E, Gaies Michael G
1Department of Pediatrics, Section of Critical Care Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle Children's Hospital, Seattle, WA. 2Department of Pediatrics, Section of Cardiology, University of Michigan Medical School, C.S. Mott Children's Hospital, Ann Arbor, MI.
Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2016 Aug;17(8 Suppl 1):S362-6. doi: 10.1097/PCC.0000000000000785.
In this review, the current state of outcomes analysis and quality improvement in children with acquired and congenital cardiovascular disease will be discussed, with an emphasis on defining and measuring outcomes and quality in pediatric cardiac critical care medicine and risk stratification systems.
MEDLINE and PubMed
: Measuring quality and outcomes in the pediatric cardiac critical care environment is challenging owing to many inherent obstacles, including a diverse patient mix, difficulty in determining how the care of the ICU team contributes to outcomes, and the lack of an adequate risk-adjustment method for pediatric cardiac critical care patients. Despite these barriers, new solutions are emerging that capitalize on lessons learned from other quality improvement initiatives, providing opportunities to build upon previous successes.
在本综述中,将讨论获得性和先天性心血管疾病患儿的结局分析和质量改进的现状,重点是定义和衡量儿科心脏重症医学中的结局和质量以及风险分层系统。
MEDLINE和PubMed
在儿科心脏重症监护环境中衡量质量和结局具有挑战性,原因有许多内在障碍,包括患者组合多样、难以确定重症监护病房团队的护理如何影响结局,以及缺乏适用于儿科心脏重症监护患者的风险调整方法。尽管存在这些障碍,但新的解决方案正在出现,这些方案利用了从其他质量改进举措中学到的经验教训,为在以往成功的基础上再接再厉提供了机会。