Almonroeder Thomas G, Benson Lauren C, O'Connor Kristian M
J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2016 Sep;46(9):749-55. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2016.6253. Epub 2016 Aug 5.
Study Design Controlled laboratory study, cross-sectional. Background Orthotic prescription is often based on the premise that the mechanical effects will be more prominent in individuals with greater calcaneal eversion. Objective To compare the effects of a prefabricated foot orthosis on lower extremity kinematics and kinetics between recreational athletes with high and low calcaneal eversion during running. Methods Thirty-one recreational athletes were included in this study. Three-dimensional kinematic and kinetic data were collected while running with and without a foot orthosis. Participants were grouped based on the degree of calcaneal eversion during the running trials relative to a standing trial (dynamic foot motion). The effects of the orthosis on the frontal and transverse plane angles and moments of the hip and knee were compared between the 10 participants with the greatest and least amount of dynamic foot motion. Results There were no significant interactions (group by orthotic condition) for any of the kinematic or kinetic variables of interest. Conclusion The effects of an orthosis on the mechanics of the hip and knee do not appear to be dependent on an individual's dynamic foot motion. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2016;46(9):749-755. Epub 5 Aug 2016. doi:10.2519/jospt.2016.6253.
对照实验室研究,横断面研究。背景:矫形器处方通常基于这样的前提,即机械效应在跟骨外翻程度较大的个体中会更为显著。目的:比较预制足矫形器对跑步时跟骨外翻程度高和低的休闲运动员下肢运动学和动力学的影响。方法:本研究纳入31名休闲运动员。在佩戴和不佩戴足矫形器跑步时收集三维运动学和动力学数据。根据跑步试验期间相对于站立试验(动态足部运动)的跟骨外翻程度对参与者进行分组。比较矫形器对10名动态足部运动最大和最小的参与者在额状面和横断面角度以及髋部和膝部力矩的影响。结果:对于任何感兴趣的运动学或动力学变量,均未发现显著的交互作用(组×矫形器条件)。结论:矫形器对髋部和膝部力学的影响似乎不依赖于个体的动态足部运动。《矫形与运动物理治疗杂志》2016年;46(9):749 - 755。2016年8月5日在线发表。doi:10.2519/jospt.2016.6253 。