Grande Maribel, Sabrià Joan, Borobio Virginia, Mercadé Immaculada, Stergiotou Iosifina, Masoller Narcís, Borrell Antoni
BCNatal, Department of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Institute Gynecology, Obstetrics and Neonatology, Hospital Clínic Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain.
BCNatal, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hospital Sant Joan de Déu. Esplugues de Llobregat, Catalonia, Spain.
Reprod Biomed Online. 2016 Oct;33(4):500-505. doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2016.07.006. Epub 2016 Jul 26.
The aim of this study was to assess the performance of first-trimester combined screening when replacing the chronological maternal age by Anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) and antral follicle count (AFC)-derived ovarian ages, as the background risk in trisomy risk estimation. A total of 639 pregnant women who completed first-trimester combined screening together with AMH and AFC determination were included. Trisomy risks were estimated based on three distinct 'maternal ages' as a-priori risk (chronological age, AMH- and AFC-derived ovarian age). The screening performance was assessed using three different approaches: received operator curve; detection rate and false positive rates for a fixed 1/250 threshold; and detection rates for a fixed 3% false positive rate. A non-significant trend was shown for AMH-derived age for both an increased area under the curve (0.986 versus 0.979) and an increased detection rate (from 83% to 100%) for a 1/250 risk threshold. For a 3% false-positive rate, a non-significant trend for increased detection with the use of both AMH- and AFC-derived ovarian ages was observed (from 67% to 83%). These results indicate that, although ovarian derived ages seem to potentially reflect a more precise background risk for fetal trisomies, the improvement in screening performance is only residual.
本研究的目的是评估在孕早期联合筛查中,用抗苗勒管激素(AMH)和窦卵泡计数(AFC)得出的卵巢年龄取代按时间顺序的母亲年龄作为三体风险估计中的背景风险时的筛查性能。总共纳入了639名同时完成孕早期联合筛查以及AMH和AFC测定的孕妇。基于三种不同的“母亲年龄”作为先验风险(按时间顺序的年龄、AMH和AFC得出的卵巢年龄)来估计三体风险。使用三种不同方法评估筛查性能:受试者工作特征曲线;固定1/250阈值下的检测率和假阳性率;以及固定3%假阳性率下的检测率。对于AMH得出的年龄,在曲线下面积增加(0.986对0.979)以及1/250风险阈值下检测率增加(从83%至100%)方面均显示出不显著的趋势。对于3%的假阳性率,观察到使用AMH和AFC得出的卵巢年龄时检测率增加的不显著趋势(从67%至83%)。这些结果表明,尽管卵巢得出的年龄似乎有可能反映胎儿三体更精确的背景风险,但筛查性能的改善只是残余的。