Ronald O. Perelman Department of Emergency Medicine, New York University School of Medicine, 560 First Avenue, New York, NY 10016, United States; Department of Population Health, New York University School of Medicine, 227 East 30th Street, New York, NY 10016, United States.
Division of General Internal Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, 423 Guardian Drive, Philadelphia, PA 19104, United States; Center for Health Equity Research, Corporal Michael J. Crescenz Veterans Affairs Medical Center, 3900 Woodland Avenue, Philadelphia, PA 19104, United States.
Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2016 Sep;119:88-96. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2016.07.008. Epub 2016 Jul 28.
To identify population characteristics associated with local variation in the prevalence of diabetic complications and compare the geographic distribution of different types of complications in New York City.
Using an all-payer database of emergency visits, we identified the proportion of unique adults with diabetes who also had cardiac, neurologic, renal and lower extremity complications. We performed multivariable regression to identify associations of demographic and socioeconomic factors, and diabetes-specific emergency department use with the prevalence of diabetic complications by Census tract. We also used geospatial analysis to compare local hotspots of diabetic complications.
We identified 4.6million unique New York City adults, of which 10.5% had diabetes. Adjusting for demographic and socioeconomic factors, diabetes-specific emergency department use was associated with severe microvascular renal and lower extremity complications (p-values<0.001), but not with severe macrovascular cardiac or neurologic complications (p-values of 0.39 and 0.29). Our hotspot analysis demonstrated significant geographic heterogeneity in the prevalence of diabetic complications depending on the type of complication. Notably, the geographic distribution of hotspots of myocardial infarction were inversely correlated with hotspots of end-stage renal disease and lower extremity amputations (coefficients: -0.28 and -0.28).
We found differences in the local geographic distribution of diabetic complications, which highlight the contrasting risk factors for developing macrovascular versus microvascular diabetic complications. Based on our analysis, we also found that high diabetes-specific emergency department use was correlated with poor diabetic outcomes. Emergency department utilization data can help identify the location of specific populations with poor glycemic control.
确定与糖尿病并发症流行率的局部差异相关的人群特征,并比较纽约市不同类型并发症的地理分布。
我们使用全付费急诊就诊数据库,确定患有心脏、神经、肾脏和下肢并发症的独特成年糖尿病患者比例。我们进行多变量回归,以确定人口统计学和社会经济因素以及糖尿病特定急诊就诊与按普查区划分的糖尿病并发症流行率之间的关联。我们还使用地理空间分析来比较糖尿病并发症的局部热点。
我们确定了 460 万独特的纽约市成年人,其中 10.5%患有糖尿病。调整人口统计学和社会经济因素后,糖尿病特定急诊就诊与严重微血管肾脏和下肢并发症相关(p 值均<0.001),但与严重大血管心脏或神经并发症无关(p 值分别为 0.39 和 0.29)。我们的热点分析表明,根据并发症类型,糖尿病并发症的流行率存在显著的地理异质性。值得注意的是,心肌梗死热点的地理分布与终末期肾病和下肢截肢热点呈负相关(系数分别为-0.28 和-0.28)。
我们发现糖尿病并发症的局部地理分布存在差异,这突显了发生大血管与微血管糖尿病并发症的风险因素的差异。基于我们的分析,我们还发现,高糖尿病特定急诊就诊与不良糖尿病结局相关。急诊就诊利用数据可以帮助确定血糖控制不良的特定人群的位置。