• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

关爱计划模式、性暴力与心理健康临床实践

The Care Programme Approach, sexual violence and clinical practice in mental health.

作者信息

Brooker Charlie, Tocque Karen, Kennedy Angela, Brown Martin

机构信息

Royal Holloway, University of London, United Kingdom.

Glyndwr University, United Kingdom.

出版信息

J Forensic Leg Med. 2016 Oct;43:97-101. doi: 10.1016/j.jflm.2016.07.011. Epub 2016 Aug 1.

DOI:10.1016/j.jflm.2016.07.011
PMID:27497724
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Research in Sexual Assault Referral Centres has shown that 40% of those attending are known to mental health services. The question we posed in this study was to what extent do mental health services know about this group? This was a pertinent question to ask as in 2008 the Department of Health (DH) amended the Care Programme Approach (CPA) to include a question on sexual abuse/violence as part of the overall assessment.

AIMS

To assess the extent to which Mental health Trusts were implementing DH guidance on the CPA in relation to assessment of sexual violence and abuse.

METHOD

  1. Freedom of Information (FOI) requests were sent to all Mental Health Trusts. 2. The Information base at the Health and Social Care Information Centre (HSCIC) was interrogated as Trusts can make returns on this CPA question, however it is not mandatory.

RESULTS

  1. The FOI requests revealed that: only 66% of staff were trained to 'ask the question' (range 35-100%) and only five out of 53 Trusts audited whether the question was asked. 2. The HSCIC data revealed that in 2014/15 there were 335,727 people in the CPA in England and there was a record in only 17% of cases of the question being asked. Over half (57%) of the 69 providers who did not submit any information on the indicator in 2014/15 as well as, for those 30 providers who did submit information, the data field was only 41% complete.

CONCLUSIONS

The impetus for 'asking the question' first established in 2008 with the establishment of eight pilot training programmes, has been lost. It is clear that Trusts are not training adequate number of staff nor are they returning useable data to HSCIC. If 40% of people attending SARCs are known to mental health services we suspect that few staff in mental health trusts known much about such a referral. Research shows convincingly that sexual violence and abuse plays a clear role in the aetiology of mental health disorders. A history of such violence/abuse should be always established (or otherwise).

摘要

引言

对性侵犯转诊中心的研究表明,前来就诊的患者中有40%为心理健康服务机构所熟知。我们在本研究中提出的问题是,心理健康服务机构对这一群体的了解程度如何?提出这个问题很有必要,因为2008年卫生部(DH)修订了护理计划方法(CPA),将关于性虐待/暴力的问题纳入整体评估的一部分。

目的

评估心理健康信托机构在实施卫生部关于CPA中与性暴力和性虐待评估相关指导方面的程度。

方法

  1. 向所有心理健康信托机构发送了信息自由请求(FOI)。2. 对健康与社会护理信息中心(HSCIC)的信息库进行了查询,因为信托机构可以就这个CPA问题进行汇报,但这并非强制性要求。

结果

  1. 信息自由请求显示:只有66%的工作人员接受了“询问该问题”的培训(范围为35%-100%),在接受审计的53个信托机构中,只有5个机构会审核是否询问了该问题。2. HSCIC的数据显示,在2014/15年度,英格兰有335,727人纳入了CPA,只有17%的案例记录了是否询问了该问题。在2014/15年度未就该指标提交任何信息的69个提供者中,超过一半(57%)是这种情况,对于那些提交了信息的30个提供者来说,数据字段的完整性也仅为41%。

结论

2008年随着八个试点培训项目的设立而首次确立的“询问该问题”的动力已经丧失。很明显,信托机构没有培训足够数量的工作人员,也没有向HSCIC返回可用数据。如果已知40%前往性侵犯转诊中心的人是心理健康服务机构所熟知的,我们怀疑心理健康信托机构中很少有工作人员对这类转诊情况了解很多。研究有力地表明,性暴力和性虐待在心理健康障碍的病因中起着明确作用。应该始终确定(或排除)此类暴力/虐待的历史。

相似文献

1
The Care Programme Approach, sexual violence and clinical practice in mental health.关爱计划模式、性暴力与心理健康临床实践
J Forensic Leg Med. 2016 Oct;43:97-101. doi: 10.1016/j.jflm.2016.07.011. Epub 2016 Aug 1.
2
The contribution of mental health services to a new strategic direction for sexual assault and abuse services.心理健康服务对性侵犯和虐待服务新战略方向的贡献。
J Forensic Leg Med. 2019 May;64:45-48. doi: 10.1016/j.jflm.2019.04.001. Epub 2019 Apr 11.
3
Mental health risk factors in sexual assault: What should Sexual Assault Referral Centre staff be aware of?性侵犯中的心理健康风险因素:性侵犯转介中心工作人员应了解什么?
J Forensic Leg Med. 2016 May;40:28-33. doi: 10.1016/j.jflm.2016.01.028. Epub 2016 Feb 8.
4
Mental health, sexual violence and the work of Sexual Assault Referral centres (SARCs) in England.心理健康、性暴力与英格兰性侵犯转介中心(SARCs)的工作
J Forensic Leg Med. 2015 Apr;31:47-51. doi: 10.1016/j.jflm.2015.01.006. Epub 2015 Feb 4.
5
The high prevalence of pre-existing mental health complaints in clients attending Saint Mary's Sexual Assault Referral Centre: Implications for initial management and engagement with the Independent Sexual Violence Advisor service at the centre.圣玛丽性侵犯转介中心就诊客户中既往心理健康问题的高患病率:对该中心初始管理及与独立性暴力顾问服务衔接的影响
J Forensic Leg Med. 2019 Feb;61:102-107. doi: 10.1016/j.jflm.2018.12.001. Epub 2018 Dec 5.
6
Uncovering sexual abuse: evaluation of the effectiveness of The Victims of Violence and Abuse Prevention Programme.揭示性虐待:暴力和虐待预防计划有效性的评估。
J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2010 Feb;17(1):9-18. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2850.2009.01479.x.
7
Identification and Referral to Improve Safety (IRIS) of women experiencing domestic violence with a primary care training and support programme: a cluster randomised controlled trial.利用初级保健培训和支持计划识别和转介遭受家庭暴力的妇女以提高安全性(IRIS):一项集群随机对照试验。
Lancet. 2011 Nov 19;378(9805):1788-95. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)61179-3. Epub 2011 Oct 12.
8
Preferred choice of gender of staff providing care to victims of sexual assault in Sexual Assault Referral Centres (SARCs).性侵犯转介中心(SARCs)中为性侵犯受害者提供护理的工作人员的性别首选。
J Forensic Leg Med. 2008 Aug;15(6):363-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jflm.2008.01.005. Epub 2008 Apr 11.
9
The identification and treatment of mental health and substance misuse problems in sexual assault services: A systematic review.性侵犯服务中心的心理健康和物质使用问题的识别与治疗:系统评价。
PLoS One. 2020 Apr 10;15(4):e0231260. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0231260. eCollection 2020.
10
Prison mental health in-reach teams in England: the care programme approach and sexual abuse/violence.英格兰监狱心理健康外联团队:关怀方案方法与性虐待/暴力。
Br J Psychiatry. 2017 Dec;211(6):337-338. doi: 10.1192/bjp.bp.117.200428.

引用本文的文献

1
Identifying victimisation profiles in people with psychosis and a history of childhood trauma: a latent class analysis.识别患有精神病且有童年创伤史的人群中的受害情况特征:一项潜在类别分析。
Psychosis. 2021 Dec 21;15(1):66-76. doi: 10.1080/17522439.2021.2009903. eCollection 2023.
2
Health professionals' experiences of providing care for women survivors of sexual violence in psychiatric inpatient units.卫生专业人员在精神科住院病房为性暴力幸存者女性提供护理的体验。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2019 Nov 14;19(1):839. doi: 10.1186/s12913-019-4683-z.
3
The Trauma and Life Events (TALE) checklist: development of a tool for improving routine screening in people with psychosis.
创伤与生活事件(TALE)检查表:一种用于改善精神病患者常规筛查的工具的开发
Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2018 Sep 11;9(1):1512265. doi: 10.1080/20008198.2018.1512265. eCollection 2018.