McRae Leon
Dickson Poon School of Law, King's College London , UK.
J Forens Psychiatry Psychol. 2016 Jul 3;27(4):476-488. doi: 10.1080/14789949.2016.1155227. Epub 2016 Mar 31.
Empirical research has demonstrated a link between legal coercion and treatment engagement following conviction among those with severe personality disorder. Legal coercive pressures were often applied by the Indeterminate Sentence for Public Protection (IPP), until it was replaced by the Extended Determinate Sentence by the Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Act 2012. In this paper, it is proposed that use of the new determinate sentence will lessen motivation for treatment engagement. One effect of treatment refusal may be greater reliance by the Secretary of State for Justice on his jurisdiction to transfer prisoners due for release to secure hospital transfers under the Mental Health Act 1983. Not only will this risk posturing undermine the principal aim of the Offender Personality Disorder Implementation Pathway to improve treatment engagement among the target group, it will also have negative implications for medical practitioners working in secure forensic hospitals. To demonstrate what is at stake, the paper briefly recapitulates empirical findings familiar to readers of the journal, before drawing on original unpublished data.
实证研究表明,对于患有严重人格障碍的人,法律强制手段与定罪后的治疗参与度之间存在联系。在2012年《法律援助、量刑和罪犯惩罚法》将不定期公共保护刑罚(IPP)取代之前,法律强制压力通常由该刑罚施加。本文提出,新的确定刑罚的使用将降低治疗参与的动机。拒绝治疗的一个后果可能是,司法大臣会更依赖其管辖权,根据1983年《精神健康法》,将即将获释的囚犯转移至安全医院。这种冒险的姿态不仅会破坏罪犯人格障碍实施途径改善目标群体治疗参与度的主要目标,还会对在安全法医医院工作的医务人员产生负面影响。为了说明其中的利害关系,本文在引用未发表的原始数据之前,简要概述了该期刊读者熟悉的实证研究结果。