Eglit Graham M L, Lynch Julie K, McCaffrey Robert J
a Department of Psychology , University at Albany, State University of New York , Albany , NY , USA.
b Veterans Administration San Diego Healthcare System , San Diego , CA , USA.
J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2017 Mar;39(2):173-189. doi: 10.1080/13803395.2016.1210573. Epub 2016 Aug 8.
The Test of Memory Malingering (TOMM) and the Word Memory Test (WMT) are both performance validity tests (PVTs) that use a two-alternative forced-choice (2AFC) recognition memory format. Several studies have reported that these tests are susceptible to cognitive impairment and that the WMT is more susceptible than the TOMM. The current study explored components of recognition memory (i.e., conscious recollection and familiarity) underlying the TOMM and WMT to identify factors that make them susceptible and resilient to cognitive impairment.
Fifty-four nonclinical undergraduate research participants were administered the TOMM and WMT while providing introspective judgments about their recognition memory using the remember/know/guess procedure. In addition, half of participants were administered dual-task interference, a manipulation intended to reduce recollection, during these tests, while the other half completed these tests without interference. Standard cutoffs on the TOMM and WMT were explored, as well as alternative cutoffs based on TOMM Trial 1 scores.
The WMT was more impacted by dual-task interference than standard TOMM cutoff trials, while alternative TOMM cutoff trials were equally impacted by dual-task interference relative to the WMT. Dual-task interference reduced recollection on these tests, but spared familiarity. Standard TOMM trials and the WMT were relatively comparable on levels of recollection, but familiarity contributed more to the TOMM than to the WMT. Alternative TOMM trials possessed lower familiarity and recollection than standard TOMM trials and lower recollection than the WMT.
Reduced recollection places examinees at risk of failing the TOMM and WMT, while familiarity contributes to the relative resilience of the standard TOMM. Future development of 2AFC recognition memory PVTs should attempt to maximize the contribution of familiarity to their completion.
记忆伪装测验(TOMM)和词语记忆测验(WMT)均为使用二选一强制选择(2AFC)识别记忆格式的效标效度测验(PVTs)。多项研究报告称,这些测验易受认知损害影响,且WMT比TOMM更易受影响。本研究探讨了TOMM和WMT背后的识别记忆成分(即有意识回忆和熟悉感),以确定使它们易受认知损害影响以及具有抗认知损害能力的因素。
对54名非临床本科研究参与者进行了TOMM和WMT测验,同时使用回忆/知道/猜测程序让他们对自己的识别记忆进行内省判断。此外,一半参与者在这些测验中接受了双重任务干扰,这是一种旨在减少回忆的操作,而另一半参与者在无干扰的情况下完成这些测验。探讨了TOMM和WMT的标准临界值,以及基于TOMM第1次试验分数的替代临界值。
与标准TOMM临界值试验相比,WMT受双重任务干扰的影响更大,而相对于WMT,替代TOMM临界值试验受双重任务干扰的影响相同。双重任务干扰减少了这些测验中的回忆,但保留了熟悉感。标准TOMM试验和WMT在回忆水平上相对可比,但熟悉感对TOMM的贡献比对WMT的更大。替代TOMM试验的熟悉感和回忆比标准TOMM试验低,回忆比WMT低。
回忆减少使受测者有在TOMM和WMT中不及格的风险,而熟悉感有助于标准TOMM具有相对的抗干扰能力。未来二选一强制选择识别记忆效标效度测验的开发应尝试最大限度地提高熟悉感对测验完成的贡献。