Wirsching Hans-Georg, Weller Michael
Department of Neurology, University Hospital Zurich, Frauenklinikstrasse 26, CH-8091, Zurich, Switzerland.
Curr Treat Options Oncol. 2016 Oct;17(10):51. doi: 10.1007/s11864-016-0430-4.
The revised World Health Organization (WHO) classification of tumors of the central nervous system of 2016 combines biology-driven molecular marker diagnostics with classical histological cancer diagnosis. Reclassification of gliomas by molecular similarity beyond histological boundaries improves outcome prediction and will increasingly guide treatment decisions. This change in paradigms implies more personalized and eventually more efficient therapeutic approaches, but the era of molecular targeted therapies for gliomas is yet at its onset. Promising results of molecularly targeted therapies in genetically less complex gliomas with circumscribed growth such as subependymal giant cell astrocytoma or pilocytic astrocytoma support further development of molecularly targeted therapies. In diffuse gliomas, several molecular markers that predict benefit from alkylating agent chemotherapy have been identified in recent years. For example, co-deletion of chromosome arms 1p and 19q predicts benefit from polychemotherapy with procarbazine, CCNU (lomustine), and vincristine (PCV) in patients with anaplastic oligodendroglioma, and the presence of 1p/19q co-deletion was integrated as a defining feature of oligodendroglial tumors in the revised WHO classification. However, the tremendous increase in knowledge of molecular drivers of diffuse gliomas on genomic, epigenetic, and gene expression levels has not yet translated into effective molecular targeted therapies. Multiple reasons account for the failure of early clinical trials of molecularly targeted therapies in diffuse gliomas, including the lack of molecular entry controls as well as pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamics issues, but the key challenge of specifically targeting the molecular backbone of diffuse gliomas is probably extensive clonal heterogeneity. A more profound understanding of clonal selection, alternative activation of oncogenic signaling pathways, and genomic instability is warranted to identify effective combination treatments and ultimately improve survival.
2016年世界卫生组织(WHO)修订的中枢神经系统肿瘤分类将基于生物学的分子标志物诊断与经典的组织学癌症诊断相结合。根据分子相似性对胶质瘤进行重新分类,突破了组织学界限,改善了预后预测,并将越来越多地指导治疗决策。这种范式的转变意味着更个性化且最终更有效的治疗方法,但胶质瘤分子靶向治疗的时代才刚刚开始。分子靶向治疗在具有局限性生长的基因复杂性较低的胶质瘤(如室管膜下巨细胞星形细胞瘤或毛细胞型星形细胞瘤)中取得的有前景的结果,支持了分子靶向治疗的进一步发展。在弥漫性胶质瘤中,近年来已经鉴定出几种预测烷化剂化疗获益的分子标志物。例如,染色体臂1p和19q的共同缺失预测间变性少突胶质细胞瘤患者接受丙卡巴肼、洛莫司汀(CCNU)和长春新碱(PCV)联合化疗会获益,并且1p/19q共同缺失的存在已被纳入修订后的WHO分类中少突胶质细胞肿瘤的一个定义特征。然而,在基因组、表观遗传和基因表达水平上,弥漫性胶质瘤分子驱动因素知识的大量增加尚未转化为有效的分子靶向治疗。弥漫性胶质瘤分子靶向治疗早期临床试验失败有多种原因,包括缺乏分子进入控制以及药代动力学和药效学问题,但特异性靶向弥漫性胶质瘤分子主干的关键挑战可能是广泛的克隆异质性。有必要更深入地了解克隆选择、致癌信号通路的替代激活和基因组不稳定性,以确定有效的联合治疗方法并最终提高生存率。