Choi Bryan, Asselin Nicholas, Pettit Catherine C, Dannecker Max, Machan Jason T, Merck Derek L, Merck Lisa H, Suner Selim, Williams Kenneth A, Jay Gregory D, Kobayashi Leo
From the Department of Emergency Medicine (B.C., N.A., C.C.P., S.S., K.A.W., G.D.J., L.K., L.H.M.), Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI; Lifespan Medical Simulation Center (M.D., L.K.), Providence, RI; Biostatistics Core (J.T.M.), Rhode Island Hospital, Providence, RI; Department of Diagnostic Imaging (D.L.M., L.H.M.), Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI; School of Engineering (G.D.J.), Brown University, Providence, RI.
Simul Healthc. 2016 Dec;11(6):365-375. doi: 10.1097/SIH.0000000000000178.
Effective resuscitation of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) patients is challenging. Alternative resuscitative approaches using electromechanical adjuncts may improve provider performance. Investigators applied simulation to study the effect of an experimental automation-assisted, goal-directed OHCA management protocol on EMS providers' resuscitation performance relative to standard protocols and equipment.
Two-provider (emergency medical technicians (EMT)-B and EMT-I/C/P) teams were randomized to control or experimental group. Each team engaged in 3 simulations: baseline simulation (standard roles); repeat simulation (standard roles); and abbreviated repeat simulation (reversed roles, i.e., basic life support provider performing ALS tasks). Control teams used standard OHCA protocols and equipment (with high-performance cardiopulmonary resuscitation training intervention); for second and third simulations, experimental teams performed chest compression, defibrillation, airway, pulmonary ventilation, vascular access, medication, and transport tasks with goal-directed protocol and resuscitation-automating devices. Videorecorders and simulator logs collected resuscitation data.
Ten control and 10 experimental teams comprised 20 EMT-B's; 1 EMT-I, 8 EMT-C's, and 11 EMT-P's; study groups were not fully matched. Both groups suboptimally performed chest compressions and ventilations at baseline. For their second simulations, control teams performed similarly except for reduced on-scene time, and experimental teams improved their chest compressions (P=0.03), pulmonary ventilations (P<0.01), and medication administration (P=0.02); changes in their performance of chest compression, defibrillation, airway, and transport tasks did not attain significance against control teams' changes. Experimental teams maintained performance improvements during reversed-role simulations.
Simulation-based investigation into OHCA resuscitation revealed considerable variability and improvable deficiencies in small EMS teams. Goal-directed, automation-assisted OHCA management augmented select resuscitation bundle element performance without comprehensive improvement.
对院外心脏骤停(OHCA)患者进行有效的复苏具有挑战性。使用机电辅助设备的替代复苏方法可能会提高急救人员的表现。研究人员应用模拟方法来研究一种实验性的自动化辅助、目标导向的OHCA管理方案相对于标准方案和设备对急救医疗服务(EMS)人员复苏表现的影响。
由两名急救人员(急救医疗技术员(EMT)-B和EMT-I/C/P)组成的团队被随机分为对照组或实验组。每个团队进行3次模拟:基线模拟(标准角色);重复模拟(标准角色);以及简化重复模拟(角色互换,即基础生命支持提供者执行高级生命支持任务)。对照组使用标准的OHCA方案和设备(并接受高性能心肺复苏培训干预);在第二次和第三次模拟中,实验组使用目标导向方案和复苏自动化设备执行胸外按压、除颤、气道管理、肺通气、血管通路建立、用药和转运任务。录像机和模拟器日志收集复苏数据。
10个对照组和10个实验组由20名EMT-B、1名EMT-I、8名EMT-C和11名EMT-P组成;研究组未完全匹配。两组在基线时胸外按压和通气的执行情况均未达到最佳。对于第二次模拟,对照组除现场时间缩短外表现相似,而实验组在胸外按压(P=0.03)、肺通气(P<0.01)和用药(P=0.02)方面有所改善;其在胸外按压、除颤、气道管理和转运任务表现上的变化与对照组相比无显著差异。实验组在角色互换模拟中保持了性能改善。
基于模拟对OHCA复苏的调查显示,小型EMS团队存在相当大的变异性和可改进缺陷之处存在。目标导向、自动化辅助的OHCA管理提高了选定复苏捆绑要素的性能,但没有全面改善。