Gabig Theodore G, Waltzer Wayne C, Whyard Terry, Romanov Victor
Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY 11794, USA.
Department of Urology, School of Medicine, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY 11794, USA.
Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2016 Sep 16;478(2):887-92. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2016.08.046. Epub 2016 Aug 9.
The current intravesical treatment of bladder cancer (BC) is limited to a few chemotherapeutics that show imperfect effectiveness and are associated with some serious complications. Thus, there is an urgent need for alternative therapies, especially for patients with high-risk non-muscle invasive (NMIBC). Clostridium perfringens enterotoxin (CPE), cytolytic protein binds to its receptors: claudin 3 and 4 that are expressed in epithelial cells. This binding is followed by rapid cell death. Claudin 4 is present in several epithelial tissue including bladder urothelium and its expression is elevated in some forms of BC. In addition to directly targeting BC cells, binding of CPE to claudins increases urothelium permeability that creates conditions for better accession of the tumor. Therefore, we evaluated CPE as a candidate for intravesical treatment of BC using a cellular model. We examined cytotoxicity of CPE against BC cells lines and 3D cultures of cells derived from surgical samples. To better elucidate cellular mechanisms, activated by CPE and to consider the use of CPE non-toxic fragment (C-CPE) for combination treatment with other drugs we synthesized C-CPE, compared its cytotoxic activity with CPE and examined claudin 4 expression and intracellular localization after C-CPE treatment. CPE induced cell death after 1 h in low aggressive RT4 cells, in moderately aggressive 5637 cells and in the primary 3D cultures of BC cells derived from NMIBC. Conversely, non-transformed urothelial cells and cells derived from highly aggressive tumor (T24) survived this treatment. The reason for this resistance to CPE might be the lower expression of CLDNs or their inaccessibility for CPE in these cells. C-CPE treatment for 48 h did not affect cell viability in tested cells, but declined expression of CLDN4 in RT4 cells. C-CPE increased sensitivity of RT4 cells to Mitommycin C and Dasatinib. To better understand mechanisms of this effect we examined expression and phosphorylation status of EphA2 and Src after C-CPE treatment and found changes in expression and phosphorylated status of these regulatory molecules. These observations show that after additional preclinical studies CPE and C-CPE in combinations with other drugs can be considered as a potential modalities for intravesical treatment of BC because of its ability to effectively destroy BC cells expressing claudin 4 and low toxicity against normal urothelium.
目前膀胱癌(BC)的膀胱内治疗仅限于少数几种化疗药物,这些药物疗效欠佳且伴有一些严重并发症。因此,迫切需要替代疗法,尤其是针对高危非肌层浸润性膀胱癌(NMIBC)患者。产气荚膜梭菌肠毒素(CPE)是一种溶细胞蛋白,可与其在上皮细胞中表达的受体:紧密连接蛋白3和4结合。这种结合随后会导致细胞迅速死亡。紧密连接蛋白4存在于包括膀胱尿路上皮在内的多种上皮组织中,并且在某些形式的膀胱癌中其表达会升高。除了直接靶向膀胱癌细胞外,CPE与紧密连接蛋白的结合还会增加尿路上皮通透性,从而为肿瘤更好地被侵袭创造条件。因此,我们使用细胞模型评估了CPE作为膀胱内治疗膀胱癌的候选药物。我们检测了CPE对膀胱癌细胞系以及手术样本来源细胞的3D培养物的细胞毒性。为了更好地阐明CPE激活的细胞机制,并考虑使用CPE无毒片段(C-CPE)与其他药物联合治疗,我们合成了C-CPE,将其细胞毒性活性与CPE进行比较,并检测了C-CPE处理后紧密连接蛋白4的表达和细胞内定位。CPE在低侵袭性的RT4细胞、中度侵袭性的5637细胞以及NMIBC来源的膀胱癌细胞原代3D培养物中处理1小时后诱导细胞死亡。相反,未转化的尿路上皮细胞和高侵袭性肿瘤(T24)来源的细胞在这种处理下存活。这些细胞对CPE产生抗性的原因可能是这些细胞中紧密连接蛋白的表达较低或CPE无法接近它们。C-CPE处理48小时对测试细胞的细胞活力没有影响,但降低了RT4细胞中紧密连接蛋白4的表达。C-CPE增加了RT4细胞对丝裂霉素C和达沙替尼的敏感性。为了更好地理解这种作用的机制,我们检测了C-CPE处理后EphA2和Src的表达及磷酸化状态,发现这些调节分子的表达和磷酸化状态发生了变化。这些观察结果表明,经过进一步的临床前研究后,CPE和C-CPE与其他药物联合可被视为膀胱内治疗膀胱癌的潜在方式,因为它们能够有效破坏表达紧密连接蛋白4的膀胱癌细胞,且对正常尿路上皮毒性较低。