Suppr超能文献

伴有del(17p)/TP53突变的慢性淋巴细胞白血病的治疗:异基因造血干细胞移植还是BCR信号抑制剂?

Treatment of Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia With del(17p)/TP53 Mutation: Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation or BCR-Signaling Inhibitors?

作者信息

Montserrat Emili, Dreger Peter

机构信息

Institute of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Hematology, Hospital Clinic, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain; European Research Initiative on Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia, Barcelona, Spain.

Department of Medicine V, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany; European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation, Paris, France.

出版信息

Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk. 2016 Aug;16 Suppl:S74-81. doi: 10.1016/j.clml.2016.02.013.

Abstract

The treatment of patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) whose tumor presents the del(17p)/TP53 mutation is a major challenge. Treatment with chemo(immuno)therapy, immunomodulators, or the anti-CD52 monoclonal antibody alemtuzumab produces transient, unsatisfactory responses. Reduced-intensity-conditioning allotransplantation produces sustained progression-free survival and overall survival (40%-60% at 5 years), equivalent to the cure of the disease, even in cases with adverse biomarkers. Unfortunately, despite improvements in this procedure, the non-relapse mortality continues to be high (15%-30%), and only highly selected patients (young, physically fit, with treatment-sensitive disease, not heavily pretreated, and with a fully matched donor) may benefit from the intervention without incurring unacceptable treatment-related risks. The advent of non-cytotoxic agents, such as the inhibitors of the B-cell-antigen receptor signaling (BCRi; ibrutinib, idelasilib) and anti-BCL2 proteins (venetoclax), is rapidly changing the treatment landscape in CLL, including its high-risk forms. These agents are satisfactorily safe. Moreover, they are effective across all genetic subgroups, albeit results in del(17p)/TP53 mutated cases are inferior to those with no adverse genetics. Importantly, progression-free and overall survival decline over time. These agents are tolerated much better and are more effective than conventional therapies used in high-risk CLL, and treatment results are close to those obtained with allotransplantation. As there is no proof as to which treatment (BCRi vs. allotransplantation) is preferable, treatment recommendations should be individualized, weighing the pros and cons of each of these interventions. In most patients, however, initial therapy with BCRi (ideally in combination with monoclonal antibodies and/or other small molecules) is a reasonable approach, and allotransplantation should be considered in selected patients refractory to BCRi-based treatment and/or extremely high-risk disease.

摘要

对于肿瘤存在del(17p)/TP53突变的慢性淋巴细胞白血病(CLL)患者的治疗是一项重大挑战。采用化学(免疫)疗法、免疫调节剂或抗CD52单克隆抗体阿仑单抗进行治疗,只能产生短暂且不尽人意的反应。降低强度预处理的同种异体移植可带来持续的无进展生存期和总生存期(5年时为40%-60%),等同于疾病治愈,即便在存在不良生物标志物的情况下也是如此。不幸的是,尽管该程序有所改进,但非复发死亡率仍然很高(15%-30%),只有经过严格挑选的患者(年轻、身体健康、疾病对治疗敏感、未经过大量预处理且有完全匹配的供体)才能在不承担不可接受的治疗相关风险的情况下从干预中获益。非细胞毒性药物的出现,如B细胞抗原受体信号传导抑制剂(BCRi;依鲁替尼、idelasilib)和抗BCL2蛋白(维奈托克),正在迅速改变CLL包括其高危形式的治疗格局。这些药物安全性良好。此外,它们在所有基因亚组中均有效,尽管在del(17p)/TP53突变病例中的结果不如无不良基因的病例。重要的是,无进展生存期和总生存期会随着时间推移而下降。这些药物的耐受性比用于高危CLL的传统疗法好得多,且更有效,治疗结果与同种异体移植相近似。由于尚无证据表明哪种治疗方法(BCRi与同种异体移植)更可取,治疗建议应个体化,权衡每种干预措施的利弊。然而,在大多数患者中,初始使用BCRi治疗(理想情况下与单克隆抗体和/或其他小分子联合使用)是一种合理的方法,对于对基于BCRi的治疗难治和/或患有极高危疾病的特定患者,应考虑同种异体移植。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验