Suppr超能文献

描述高容量癌症切除生态系统在低容量、高质量手术治疗中的作用。

Characterizing the role of a high-volume cancer resection ecosystem on low-volume, high-quality surgical care.

作者信息

Kothari Anai N, Blanco Barbara A, Brownlee Sarah A, Evans Ann E, Chang Victor A, Abood Gerard J, Settimi Raffaella, Raicu Daniela S, Kuo Paul C

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Loyola University Medical Center, Maywood, IL; One:MAP Section of Clinical Informatics and Analytics, Loyola University Medical Center, Maywood, IL.

One:MAP Section of Clinical Informatics and Analytics, Loyola University Medical Center, Maywood, IL.

出版信息

Surgery. 2016 Oct;160(4):839-849. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2016.07.002. Epub 2016 Aug 11.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Our objective was to determine the hospital resources required for low-volume, high-quality care at high-volume cancer resection centers.

METHODS

Patients who underwent esophageal, pancreatic, and rectal resection for malignancy were identified using Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project State Inpatient Database (Florida and California) between 2007 and 2011. Annual case volume by procedure was used to identify high- and low-volume centers. Hospital data were obtained from the American Hospital Association Annual Survey Database. Procedure risk-adjusted mortality was calculated for each hospital using multilevel, mixed-effects models.

RESULTS

A total of 24,784 patients from 302 hospitals met the inclusion criteria. Of these, 13 hospitals were classified as having a high-volume, oncologic resection ecosystem by being a high-volume hospital for ≥2 studied procedures. A total of 11 of 31 studied hospital factors were strongly associated with hospitals that performed a high volume of cancer resections and were used to develop the High Volume Ecosystem for Oncologic Resections (HIVE-OR) score. At low-volume centers, increasing HIVE-OR score resulted in decreased mortality for rectal cancer resection (P = .038). HIVE-OR was not related to risk-adjusted mortality for esophagectomy (P = .421) or pancreatectomy (P = .413) at low-volume centers.

CONCLUSION

Our study found that in some settings, low-volume, high-quality cancer surgical care can be explained by having a high-volume ecosystem.

摘要

背景

我们的目标是确定高容量癌症切除中心提供低容量、高质量护理所需的医院资源。

方法

利用医疗成本和利用项目州住院数据库(佛罗里达州和加利福尼亚州)识别2007年至2011年间因恶性肿瘤接受食管、胰腺和直肠切除术的患者。按手术计算的年度病例量用于确定高容量和低容量中心。医院数据来自美国医院协会年度调查数据库。使用多级混合效应模型计算每家医院的手术风险调整死亡率。

结果

来自302家医院的24784名患者符合纳入标准。其中,13家医院因≥2项研究手术为高容量医院而被归类为具有高容量肿瘤切除生态系统。在31项研究的医院因素中,共有11项与进行大量癌症切除术的医院密切相关,并被用于制定肿瘤切除高容量生态系统(HIVE-OR)评分。在低容量中心,HIVE-OR评分的增加导致直肠癌切除术死亡率降低(P = .038)。在低容量中心,HIVE-OR与食管切除术(P = .421)或胰腺切除术(P = .413)的风险调整死亡率无关。

结论

我们的研究发现,在某些情况下,低容量、高质量的癌症手术护理可以通过拥有高容量生态系统来解释。

相似文献

1
Characterizing the role of a high-volume cancer resection ecosystem on low-volume, high-quality surgical care.
Surgery. 2016 Oct;160(4):839-849. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2016.07.002. Epub 2016 Aug 11.
2
Hospital procedure volume should not be used as a measure of surgical quality.
Ann Surg. 2012 Oct;256(4):606-15. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e31826b4be6.
3
Hospital teaching status and outcomes of complex surgical procedures in the United States.
Arch Surg. 2004 Feb;139(2):137-41. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.139.2.137.
4
A decade analysis of trends and outcomes of partial versus total esophagectomy in the United States.
Ann Surg. 2013 Sep;258(3):450-8. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3182a1b11d.
5
Hospital esophageal cancer resection volume does not predict patient mortality risk.
Ann Thorac Surg. 2012 May;93(5):1690-6; discussion 1696-8. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2012.01.111.
6
Outcomes of Complex Gastrointestinal Cancer Resection at US News & World Report Top-Ranked vs Non-Ranked Hospitals.
J Am Coll Surg. 2021 Jul;233(1):21-27.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2021.02.012. Epub 2021 Mar 19.
7
Are minimum volume standards appropriate for lung and esophageal surgery?
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2018 Jun;155(6):2683-2694.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2017.11.073. Epub 2017 Dec 6.

引用本文的文献

2
Regionalization of thoracic surgery improves short-term cancer esophagectomy outcomes.
J Thorac Dis. 2019 May;11(5):1867-1878. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2019.05.30.
4
Seeing the forest beyond the trees: Predicting survival in burn patients with machine learning.
Am J Surg. 2018 Mar;215(3):411-416. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2017.10.027. Epub 2017 Nov 7.

本文引用的文献

1
Balancing Optimal Outcomes With Access to Care: It Can Be Done!
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2015 Dec 28;8(15):1952-1953. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2015.10.023.
2
Pledging to Eliminate Low-Volume Surgery.
N Engl J Med. 2015 Oct 8;373(15):1388-90. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1508472.
4
Back to the Future: Volume as a Quality Metric.
JAMA. 2015 Jul 21;314(3):214-5. doi: 10.1001/jama.2015.7580.
5
Epidemiologic research with administrative databases: red herrings, false alarms and pseudo-epidemics.
Hum Reprod. 2015 Aug;30(8):1749-52. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dev151. Epub 2015 Jun 24.
7
Variation in hospital mortality rates with inpatient cancer surgery.
Ann Surg. 2015 Apr;261(4):632-6. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000000690.
10
Limitations of administrative databases.
JAMA. 2012 Jun 27;307(24):2589; author reply 2589-90. doi: 10.1001/jama.2012.6626.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验