Plasma Chemistry Research Group, Research Centre for Natural Sciences, Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Magyar Tudósok krt. 2, 1117, Budapest XI, Hungary.
Department of Applied Chemistry, Faculty of Food Science, Szent István University, Villányi út 29-43, 1118, Budapest XI, Hungary.
Anal Bioanal Chem. 2016 Sep;408(23):6403-11. doi: 10.1007/s00216-016-9757-8. Epub 2016 Aug 16.
Almost a hundred commercially available energy drink samples from Hungary, Slovakia, and Greece were collected for the quantitative determination of their caffeine and sugar content with FT-NIR spectroscopy and high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). Calibration models were built with partial least-squares regression (PLSR). An HPLC-UV method was used to measure the reference values for caffeine content, while sugar contents were measured with the Schoorl method. Both the nominal sugar content (as indicated on the cans) and the measured sugar concentration were used as references. Although the Schoorl method has larger error and bias, appropriate models could be developed using both references. The validation of the models was based on sevenfold cross-validation and external validation. FT-NIR analysis is a good candidate to replace the HPLC-UV method, because it is much cheaper than any chromatographic method, while it is also more time-efficient. The combination of FT-NIR with multidimensional chemometric techniques like PLSR can be a good option for the detection of low caffeine concentrations in energy drinks. Moreover, three types of energy drinks that contain (i) taurine, (ii) arginine, and (iii) none of these two components were classified correctly using principal component analysis and linear discriminant analysis. Such classifications are important for the detection of adulterated samples and for quality control, as well. In this case, more than a hundred samples were used for the evaluation. The classification was validated with cross-validation and several randomization tests (X-scrambling). Graphical Abstract The way of energy drinks from cans to appropriate chemometric models.
从匈牙利、斯洛伐克和希腊收集了近百种市售能量饮料样品,并用傅里叶变换近红外光谱(FT-NIR)和高效液相色谱(HPLC)定量测定其咖啡因和糖含量。使用偏最小二乘回归(PLSR)建立校准模型。使用高效液相色谱-紫外法(HPLC-UV)测量咖啡因含量的参考值,而使用肖尔法(Schoorl method)测量糖含量。名义糖含量(如罐上所示)和测量的糖浓度均用作参考。尽管肖尔法的误差和偏差较大,但使用这两个参考值都可以开发出合适的模型。模型的验证基于七重交叉验证和外部验证。FT-NIR 分析是替代 HPLC-UV 方法的良好候选方法,因为它比任何色谱方法都便宜,同时也更节省时间。FT-NIR 与多元化学计量技术(如 PLSR)的结合可以是检测能量饮料中低咖啡因浓度的良好选择。此外,使用主成分分析和线性判别分析正确分类了含有(i)牛磺酸、(ii)精氨酸和(iii)这两种成分均不含的三种能量饮料。此类分类对于检测掺假样品和质量控制非常重要。在这种情况下,使用了一百多个样本进行评估。使用交叉验证和几种随机化测试(X 混淆)对分类进行了验证。摘要 从罐装能量饮料到合适的化学计量模型的方法。