Department of Neurology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.
Department of Radiology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.
JAMA Neurol. 2016 Oct 1;73(10):1225-1230. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2016.1408.
After the many positive results in thrombectomy trials in ischemic stroke of the anterior circulation, the question arises whether these positive results also apply to the patient with basilar artery occlusion (BAO).
To report up-to-date outcome data of intra-arterial (IA) treatment in patients with BAO and to evaluate the influence of collateral circulation on outcome.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Single-center retrospective case series of 38 consecutive patients with BAO who underwent IA treatment between 2006 and 2015 at a comprehensive stroke center.
Intra-arterial treatment by mechanical thrombectomy and/or IA thrombolysis.
Adequate recanalization was defined as a score of 2b or 3 on the Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction score. Favorable outcome was defined as a modified Rankin Scale of 0 to 3 at first follow-up. Imaging data on the patency of the vertebral arteries and posterior communicating arteries, as well as the presence of cerebellar arterial anastomosis, were recorded and posttreatment imaging results were reviewed.
Of the 38 patients with BAO, mean (SD) age was 58 (16) years, and 21 (55%) were male. Twenty-seven patients (71%) were treated with intravenous thrombolysis before IA therapy. Mechanical thrombectomy was applied to 30 patients, and 7 patients received local urokinase without thrombectomy. The median National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score was 21 (interquartile range [IQR], 15-32) points, and median time to IA treatment was 288 (IQR, 216-380) minutes. Adequate recanalization was achieved in 34 of 38 cases (89%). Functional outcome was favorable in 19 (50%) patients. No association between patent collateral circulation and favorable outcome was found. Symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage occurred in 2 patients (5%).
The proportion of patients reaching a favorable outcome in our study is comparable to the IA-treated group of the MR CLEAN trial and better than the results reported in the BASICS registry, suggesting that IA intervention in patients with BAO is an effective and safe treatment modality in daily clinical practice.
在前循环缺血性脑卒中的血栓切除术试验取得众多积极结果后,人们不禁要问这些积极结果是否同样适用于基底动脉闭塞(BAO)患者。
报告最新的 BAO 患者接受动脉内(IA)治疗的结果数据,并评估侧支循环对结果的影响。
设计、地点和参与者:这是一项单中心回顾性病例系列研究,纳入了 2006 年至 2015 年期间在综合卒中中心接受 IA 治疗的 38 例连续 BAO 患者。
采用机械血栓切除术和/或 IA 溶栓进行 IA 治疗。
充分再通定义为血栓切除术治疗脑梗死评分(Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction score)的 2b 或 3 分。良好的结局定义为首次随访时改良 Rankin 量表评分为 0 至 3 分。记录椎动脉和后交通动脉通畅情况以及小脑动脉吻合情况的影像学数据,并回顾治疗后的影像学结果。
38 例 BAO 患者中,平均(SD)年龄为 58(16)岁,21 例(55%)为男性。27 例(71%)患者在 IA 治疗前接受了静脉溶栓治疗。30 例患者接受了机械血栓切除术治疗,7 例患者接受了局部尿激酶溶栓而未行血栓切除术治疗。美国国立卫生研究院卒中量表评分中位数为 21 分(四分位距 [IQR],15-32 分),IA 治疗中位时间为 288 分钟(IQR,216-380 分钟)。38 例患者中 34 例(89%)达到充分再通。19 例(50%)患者的功能结局良好。未发现有良好侧支循环与良好结局之间存在关联。2 例(5%)患者发生症状性颅内出血。
在本研究中,达到良好结局的患者比例与 MR CLEAN 试验的 IA 治疗组相当,优于 BASICS 登记处的结果,提示在日常临床实践中,IA 干预治疗 BAO 患者是一种有效且安全的治疗方式。