Zhang Zhan-feng, Min Ji-kang, Zhong Jian-ming, Wang Dan
Zhongguo Gu Shang. 2016 Jun;29(6):491-5.
To explore mid-term follow up results of distal fixation prosthesis in treating unstable intertrochanteric fractures in elderly patients.
From May 2008 to March 2014,58 elderly patients with unstable intertrochanteric were treated with distal fixation prosthesis, among them, there were 15 males and 43 females aged from 75 to 87 years old with an average of 83.2 years old. Fracture were classified according to Evans classification, 39 cases were type I c and 19 cases were type I d. Surgical risk was evaluated before operation, 9 patients were performed total hip arthroplasty and 49 patients were performed prosthetic replacement hip joint function of patients with different age period, Evans classificaton, prothesis type, fixation method were evaluated respectively by using Harris score.
Fifty-six patients were followed up from 13 to 36 months with an average of 21.6 months. Harris score was 83.51 ± 6.40, 5 cases got excellent results, 38 cases good and 13 cases moderate. Harris score of patients aged from 75 to 80 years old was 88.64 ± 2.35, 81.64 ± 6.40 in patients aged more than 80 years old, and had significant differences between two groups; Harris score in patients with type Evans I c was 83.64 ± 6.53, and 83.11 ± 6.08 in type Evans I d, while there was no significant differences between two groups. There was no obvious meaning in Harris score between patients with tension band (83.63 ± 6.15) and without tension band (82.41 ± 6.57). There was no significant meaning in Harris score between patients with normal distal fixation prosthesis (83.34 ± 6.43) and femoral moment reconstruction distal fixation prosthesis (83.92 ± 6.51). There was 1 patient occurred hip joint dislocation on the operative side and re-dislocation after manual reduction, then received open reduction. Two patients occurred femoral osteolysis without clinical symptoms, and treated conservative treatment.
Artificial joint replacement for unstable intertrochanteric fractures in elderly patients, hip joint function in patients aged more than 80 years old is worse, while there was no obvious market effect in fracture classification, whether to use tension band and type of distal fixation prosthesis, moreover, proximal femoral osteolysis should be focused on.
探讨远端固定假体治疗老年不稳定型股骨转子间骨折的中期随访结果。
2008年5月至2014年3月,58例老年不稳定型股骨转子间骨折患者采用远端固定假体治疗,其中男15例,女43例,年龄75~87岁,平均83.2岁。骨折按Evans分型,Ⅰc型39例,Ⅰd型19例。术前评估手术风险,9例行全髋关节置换术,49例行人工关节置换术。分别采用Harris评分对不同年龄段、Evans分型、假体类型、固定方式患者的髋关节功能进行评估。
56例获随访,随访时间13~36个月,平均21.6个月。Harris评分为83.51±6.40,优5例,良38例,可13例。75~80岁患者Harris评分为88.64±2.35,80岁以上患者为81.64±6.40,两组比较差异有统计学意义;EvansⅠc型患者Harris评分为83.64±6.53,Ⅰd型为83.11±6.08,两组比较差异无统计学意义。有张力带组Harris评分为83.63±6.15,无张力带组为82.41±6.57,两组比较差异无统计学意义。普通远端固定假体组Harris评分为83.34±6.43,股骨矩重建远端固定假体组为83.92±6.51,两组比较差异无统计学意义。术侧髋关节脱位1例,手法复位后再脱位,行切开复位。股骨骨质溶解2例,无临床症状,行保守治疗。
人工关节置换治疗老年不稳定型股骨转子间骨折,80岁以上患者髋关节功能较差,骨折分型、是否应用张力带及远端固定假体类型对疗效无明显影响,应关注股骨近端骨质溶解。