Dawson Samantha J, Fretz Katherine M, Chivers Meredith L
354 Humphrey Hall, Department of Psychology, Queen's University at Kingston, Kingston, ON, K7L 3N6, Canada.
218 Craine Hall, Department of Psychology, Queen's University at Kingston, Kingston, ON, K7L 3N6, Canada.
Arch Sex Behav. 2017 Jan;46(1):141-153. doi: 10.1007/s10508-016-0825-0. Epub 2016 Aug 19.
Women who report exclusive sexual attractions to men (i.e., androphilia) exhibit gender-nonspecific patterns of sexual response-similar magnitude of genital response to both male and female targets. Interestingly, women reporting any degree of attraction to women (i.e., gynephilia) show significantly greater sexual responses to stimuli depicting female targets compared to male targets. At present, the mechanism(s) underlying these patterns are unknown. According to the information processing model (IPM), attentional processing of sexual cues initiates sexual responding; thus, attention to sexual cues may be one mechanism to explain the observed within-gender differences in specificity findings among women. The purpose of the present study was to examine patterns of initial and controlled visual attention among women with varying sexual attractions. We used eye tracking to assess visual attention to sexually preferred and nonpreferred cues in a sample of 164 women who differed in their degree of androphilia and gynephilia. We found that both exclusively and predominantly androphilic women showed gender-nonspecific patterns of initial attention. In contrast, ambiphilic (i.e., concurrent androphilia and gynephilia) and predominantly/exclusively gynephilic women oriented more quickly toward female targets. Controlled attention patterns mirrored patterns of self-reported sexual attractions for three of these four groups of women, such that gender-specific patterns of visual attention were found for androphilic and gynephilic women. Ambiphilic women looked significantly longer at female targets compared to male targets. These findings support predictions from the IPM and suggest that both initial and controlled attention to sexual cues may be mechanisms contributing to within-gender variation in sexual responding.
报告只对男性有性吸引力(即恋男性)的女性表现出非性别特异性的性反应模式——对男性和女性目标的生殖器反应程度相似。有趣的是,报告对女性有任何程度吸引力(即恋女性)的女性,与男性目标相比,对描绘女性目标的刺激表现出明显更强的性反应。目前,这些模式背后的机制尚不清楚。根据信息加工模型(IPM),对性线索的注意力加工启动性反应;因此,对性线索的关注可能是解释女性中观察到的性别特异性差异结果的一种机制。本研究的目的是检查具有不同性吸引力的女性的初始视觉注意力和控制性视觉注意力模式。我们使用眼动追踪技术,在164名恋男性和恋女性程度不同的女性样本中,评估对性偏好和非偏好线索的视觉注意力。我们发现,只对男性有性吸引力和主要对男性有性吸引力的女性都表现出非性别特异性的初始注意力模式。相比之下,双性恋(即同时有恋男性和恋女性倾向)以及主要/只对女性有性吸引力的女性对女性目标的定向速度更快。对于这四组女性中的三组,控制性注意力模式反映了自我报告的性吸引力模式,因此,对恋男性和恋女性的女性发现了性别特异性的视觉注意力模式。双性恋女性对女性目标的注视时间明显长于男性目标。这些发现支持了信息加工模型的预测,并表明对性线索的初始注意力和控制性注意力都可能是导致性别内性反应差异的机制。