Suppr超能文献

韩国公众和医生对公开披露的看法:一项定性研究。

Perceptions of the general public and physicians regarding open disclosure in Korea: a qualitative study.

作者信息

Ock Minsu, Kim Hyun Joo, Jo Min-Woo, Lee Sang-Il

机构信息

Department of Preventive Medicine, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.

Department of Nursing Science, Shinsung University, Dangjin, South Korea.

出版信息

BMC Med Ethics. 2016 Aug 20;17(1):50. doi: 10.1186/s12910-016-0134-0.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Experience with open disclosure and its study are restricted to certain western countries. In addition, there are concerns that open disclosure may be less suitable in non-western countries. The present study explored and compared the in-depth perceptions of the general public and physicians regarding open disclosure in Korea.

METHODS

We applied the COREQ (Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research) checklist to this qualitative study. We conducted 20 in-depth interviews and four focus group discussions with 16 physicians and 18 members of the general public. In-depth interviews and focus group discussions were performed according to semi-structured guidelines developed according to a systematic review of open disclosure. We conducted a directed content analysis by analyzing the verbatim transcripts and field notes in accordance with the predetermined guidelines.

RESULTS

Open disclosure perceptions were summarized in terms of the "five Ws and one H" (who, what, where, when, why, and how). All physician and general public participants acknowledged the normative justifiability of open disclosure. The participants mostly agreed on the known effects of open disclosure, but the physicians had negative opinions on its expected effects, such as decreased intention of the general public to file lawsuits and increased credibility of medical professionals. Generally, the participants thought that open disclosure is required for medical errors causing major harm. However, the physicians and general public had conflicting opinions on the need for open disclosure of near misses. Most physicians did not know how to conduct open disclosure and some physicians had bad experiences due to inappropriate or incomplete open disclosure.

CONCLUSION

Physicians and the general public in Korea acknowledge the need for open disclosure. Guidelines according to the type of patient safety incident are required to encourage physicians to more readily conduct open disclosure. Furthermore, hospitals need to consider organizing a dedicated team and hiring experts for open disclosure.

摘要

背景

公开披露及其研究经验仅限于某些西方国家。此外,有人担心公开披露在非西方国家可能不太适用。本研究探讨并比较了韩国公众和医生对公开披露的深入看法。

方法

我们将COREQ(定性研究报告统一标准)清单应用于这项定性研究。我们对16名医生和18名公众进行了20次深入访谈和4次焦点小组讨论。根据对公开披露的系统评价制定的半结构化指南进行深入访谈和焦点小组讨论。我们根据预先确定的指南分析逐字记录和现场笔记,进行定向内容分析。

结果

公开披露的看法按照“五个W和一个H”(谁、什么、哪里、何时、为什么以及如何)进行了总结。所有医生和公众参与者都承认公开披露在规范上的合理性。参与者大多认同公开披露的已知效果,但医生对其预期效果持负面看法,如公众提起诉讼的意愿降低以及医疗专业人员的可信度提高。总体而言,参与者认为对于造成重大伤害的医疗差错需要进行公开披露。然而,医生和公众对于险些发生的失误是否需要公开披露存在分歧。大多数医生不知道如何进行公开披露,一些医生因公开披露不当或不完整而有过不好的经历。

结论

韩国的医生和公众承认需要进行公开披露。需要根据患者安全事件的类型制定指南,以鼓励医生更积极地进行公开披露。此外,医院需要考虑组建专门团队并聘请公开披露方面的专家。

相似文献

1
2
Nurses' Perceptions Regarding Disclosure of Patient Safety Incidents in Korea: A Qualitative Study.
Asian Nurs Res (Korean Soc Nurs Sci). 2019 Aug;13(3):200-208. doi: 10.1016/j.anr.2019.05.002. Epub 2019 Jun 5.
3
Perception Gaps of Disclosure of Patient Safety Incidents Between Nurses and the General Public in Korea.
J Patient Saf. 2021 Dec 1;17(8):e971-e975. doi: 10.1097/PTS.0000000000000781.
4
Korean physicians' perceptions regarding disclosure of patient safety incidents: A cross-sectional study.
PLoS One. 2020 Oct 8;15(10):e0240380. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0240380. eCollection 2020.
6
Experiences and responses of second victims of patient safety incidents in Korea: a qualitative study.
BMC Health Serv Res. 2019 Feb 6;19(1):100. doi: 10.1186/s12913-019-3936-1.
8
9
Evaluating the expected effects of disclosure of patient safety incidents using hypothetical cases in Korea.
PLoS One. 2018 Jun 14;13(6):e0199017. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0199017. eCollection 2018.
10
Perceptions regarding utilization of meteorological information in healthcare in Korea: a qualitative study.
Ann Occup Environ Med. 2018 Feb 1;30:8. doi: 10.1186/s40557-018-0214-3. eCollection 2018.

引用本文的文献

1
2
Education program on medical error disclosure for emergency medicine residents using standardized patients.
Korean J Med Educ. 2022 Mar;34(1):1-16. doi: 10.3946/kjme.2022.215. Epub 2022 Mar 1.
3
Korean physicians' perceptions regarding disclosure of patient safety incidents: A cross-sectional study.
PLoS One. 2020 Oct 8;15(10):e0240380. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0240380. eCollection 2020.
4
Perception Gaps of Disclosure of Patient Safety Incidents Between Nurses and the General Public in Korea.
J Patient Saf. 2021 Dec 1;17(8):e971-e975. doi: 10.1097/PTS.0000000000000781.
5
Nurses' Experiences with Disclosure of Patient Safety Incidents: A Qualitative Study.
Risk Manag Healthc Policy. 2020 May 21;13:453-464. doi: 10.2147/RMHP.S253399. eCollection 2020.
9
Medical litigation experience of the victim of medical accident: a qualitative case study.
Int J Qual Stud Health Well-being. 2019 Dec;14(1):1595958. doi: 10.1080/17482631.2019.1595958.
10
Evaluating the expected effects of disclosure of patient safety incidents using hypothetical cases in Korea.
PLoS One. 2018 Jun 14;13(6):e0199017. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0199017. eCollection 2018.

本文引用的文献

4
Sample size policy for qualitative studies using in-depth interviews.
Arch Sex Behav. 2012 Dec;41(6):1319-20. doi: 10.1007/s10508-012-0016-6.
5
Error disclosure: a new domain for safety culture assessment.
BMJ Qual Saf. 2012 Jul;21(7):594-9. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2011-000530. Epub 2012 May 5.
6
How radiation oncologists would disclose errors: results of a survey of radiation oncologists and trainees.
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2012 Oct 1;84(2):e131-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2012.03.010. Epub 2012 May 5.
7
Medical error disclosure: the gap between attitude and practice.
Postgrad Med J. 2012 Mar;88(1037):130-3. doi: 10.1136/postgradmedj-2011-130118. Epub 2012 Jan 25.
8
Regulating open disclosure: a German perspective.
Int J Qual Health Care. 2012 Feb;24(1):23-7. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzr073. Epub 2011 Dec 2.
9
Surgeon-patient information disclosure practices in southwestern Nigeria.
Med Princ Pract. 2012;21(3):238-43. doi: 10.1159/000333817. Epub 2011 Nov 23.
10
More than words: patients' views on apology and disclosure when things go wrong in cancer care.
Patient Educ Couns. 2013 Mar;90(3):341-6. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2011.07.010. Epub 2011 Aug 6.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验