Suppr超能文献

β-内酰胺类抗生素皮肤试验诊断儿童β-内酰胺类药物超敏反应。

Skin testing with β-lactam antibiotics for diagnosis of β-lactam hypersensitivity in children.

机构信息

Division of Pediatrics Allergy and Immunology, Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.

Division of Allergy, Immunology and Rheumatology, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.

出版信息

Asian Pac J Allergy Immunol. 2016 Sep;34(3):242-247. doi: 10.12932/AP0750.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Skin testing with penicilloyl-polylysine (PPL) and a minor determinant mixture (MDM) were previously recommended for evaluating β-lactam hypersensitivity. However, PPL and MDM have not been commercially available. This study was to determine the negative predictive value (NPV) of skin testing with β-lactam antibiotics for the diagnosis of β-lactam hypersensitivity.

METHOD

Patients age 1-18 years old with a history of β-lactam hypersensitivity were evaluated by skin tests (a skin prick test, an intradermal test) with penicillin G, ampicillin, amoxicillin-clavulanic acid, and the suspect βlactam. The patients who had a negative skin test were performed with a drug provocation test (DPT) in a 3-dose-graded challenge. The hypersensitivity reactions were classified into immediate and non-immediate reactions.

RESULTS

A total of 126 patients were evaluated for β-lactam hypersensitivity. Twenty two patients (17.4%) were confirmed with a ?-lactam hypersensitivity. 12 (54.54 %) of them were confirmed by a skin test. There was no systemic reaction occurring after the skin tests. Ten patients (9.6%) from 104 patients with a negative skin test showed reactions after a DPT providing the NPV of the skin test with a 91.2% value.

CONCLUSIONS

Among those children with a history of β-lactam hypersensitivity, skin testing with penicillin G, ampicillin, amoxicillin-clavulanic acid, and the suspect β-lactam was safe and provided a good NPV when PPL and MDM were unavailable. However, a skin test with β-lactam antibiotics alone did not provide a high sensitivity, thus a DPT procedure was necessary in order to confirm the diagnosis of β-lactam hypersensitivity.

摘要

目的

青霉素酰基多聚赖氨酸(PPL)和次要决定簇混合物(MDM)皮试曾被推荐用于评估β-内酰胺类药物过敏。然而,PPL 和 MDM 尚未商品化。本研究旨在确定β-内酰胺类抗生素皮试在诊断β-内酰胺类药物过敏中的阴性预测值(NPV)。

方法

对有β-内酰胺类药物过敏史的 1-18 岁患者进行皮试(皮试、皮内试验),所用药物为青霉素 G、氨苄西林、阿莫西林-克拉维酸和可疑的β-内酰胺类药物。皮试阴性的患者进行 3 剂量分级挑战的药物激发试验(DPT)。过敏反应分为即刻和非即刻反应。

结果

共对 126 例患者进行了β-内酰胺类药物过敏评估。22 例(17.4%)患者被确认为β-内酰胺类药物过敏。其中 12 例(54.54%)通过皮试得到证实。皮试后无全身反应。104 例皮试阴性患者中有 10 例(9.6%)在 DPT 后出现反应,皮试的 NPV 值为 91.2%。

结论

在有β-内酰胺类药物过敏史的儿童中,在 PPL 和 MDM 不可用时,用青霉素 G、氨苄西林、阿莫西林-克拉维酸和可疑β-内酰胺类药物进行皮试是安全的,且具有良好的 NPV。然而,单独用β-内酰胺类抗生素进行皮试并不能提供高灵敏度,因此需要进行 DPT 以确认β-内酰胺类药物过敏的诊断。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验