Department of Ophthalmology and Vision Sciences, University of Toronto Faculty of Medicine, Toronto, Canada.
Drs. Massaro & Kalenak SC, Milwaukee, Wisconsin.
Ophthalmology. 2016 Oct;123(10):2093-102. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2016.06.035. Epub 2016 Aug 17.
To compare 2 frequently used aqueous shunts for the treatment of glaucoma.
International, multicenter, randomized trial.
Patients aged 18 years or older with uncontrolled glaucoma despite maximum tolerated medical therapy, many of whom had failed or were at high risk of failing trabeculectomy.
Eligible patients were randomized to receive an Ahmed-FP7 valve implant (New World Medical, Inc, Rancho Cucamonga, CA) or a Baerveldt-350 implant (Abbott Medical Optics, Inc, Santa Ana, CA) using a standardized surgical technique.
The primary outcome was failure, defined as intraocular pressure (IOP) outside the target range (5-18 mmHg) or reduced <20% from baseline for 2 consecutive visits after 3 months, severe vision loss, or de novo glaucoma surgery. Secondary outcomes measures included IOP, medication use, visual acuity, complications, and interventions.
A total of 238 patients were randomized; 124 received the Ahmed-FP7 implant, and 114 received the Baerveldt-350 implant. Baseline characteristics were similar between groups. Mean preoperative IOP was 31.4±10.8 mmHg on 3.1±1.0 glaucoma medications. At 5 years, the cumulative failure rate was 53% in the Ahmed group and 40% in the Baerveldt group (P = 0.04). The main reason for failure in both groups was high IOP, and the cumulative de novo glaucoma reoperation rate was 18% in the Ahmed group and 11% in the Baerveldt group (P = 0.22). Hypotony resulted in failure in 5 patients (4%) in the Baerveldt group compared with none in the Ahmed group (P = 0.02). Mean IOP was 16.6±5.9 mmHg in the Ahmed group (47% reduction) and 13.6±5.0 mmHg in the Baerveldt group (57% reduction, P = 0.001). Mean medication use was 1.8±1.5 mmHg in the Ahmed group (44% reduction) and 1.2±1.3 mmHg in the Baerveldt group (61% reduction, P = 0.03). The 2 groups had similar complication rates (Ahmed 63%, Baerveldt 69%) and intervention rates (Ahmed 41%, Baerveldt 41%). Most complications were transient, and most interventions were slit-lamp procedures.
Both implants were effective in reducing IOP and the need for glaucoma medications. The Baerveldt group had a lower failure rate and a lower IOP on fewer medications than the Ahmed group, but had a small risk of hypotony that was not seen in the Ahmed group.
比较两种常用于治疗青光眼的水引流植入物。
国际多中心随机试验。
年龄在 18 岁或以上的患者,这些患者尽管接受了最大耐受的药物治疗,但仍患有无法控制的青光眼,其中许多患者曾接受或有失败或高风险接受小梁切除术。
符合条件的患者被随机分配接受 Ahmed-FP7 阀植入物(New World Medical,Inc.,Rancho Cucamonga,CA)或 Baerveldt-350 植入物(Abbott Medical Optics,Inc.,Santa Ana,CA),使用标准化的手术技术。
主要结局为失败,定义为眼压(IOP)超出目标范围(5-18mmHg)或在术后 3 个月的 2 次连续就诊中,IOP 较基线水平降低<20%,严重视力丧失或新发青光眼手术。次要观察指标包括眼压、药物使用、视力、并发症和干预措施。
共随机分配了 238 例患者;124 例接受 Ahmed-FP7 植入物,114 例接受 Baerveldt-350 植入物。两组的基线特征相似。术前平均眼压为 31.4±10.8mmHg,使用 3.1±1.0 种降眼压药物。5 年时,Ahmed 组的累积失败率为 53%,Baerveldt 组为 40%(P=0.04)。两组失败的主要原因均为眼压升高,Ahmed 组新发青光眼再手术率为 18%,Baerveldt 组为 11%(P=0.22)。5 例(4%)Baerveldt 组发生低眼压导致失败,而 Ahmed 组无此情况(P=0.02)。Ahmed 组平均眼压为 16.6±5.9mmHg(降低 47%),Baerveldt 组为 13.6±5.0mmHg(降低 57%,P=0.001)。Ahmed 组平均药物使用率为 1.8±1.5mmHg(降低 44%),Baerveldt 组为 1.2±1.3mmHg(降低 61%,P=0.03)。两组的并发症发生率(Ahmed 组 63%,Baerveldt 组 69%)和干预率(Ahmed 组 41%,Baerveldt 组 41%)相似。大多数并发症是短暂的,大多数干预措施是裂隙灯检查。
两种植入物均能有效降低眼压和降眼压药物的需求。Baerveldt 组的失败率低于 Ahmed 组,眼压更低,药物使用更少,但存在低眼压的风险,而 Ahmed 组则没有。