Fitzpatrick Clare K, Maag Chase, Clary Chadd W, Metcalfe Amber, Langhorn Jason, Rullkoetter Paul J
Center for Orthopaedic Biomechanics, University of Denver, Denver, CO, USA.
DePuy Synthes Joint Reconstruction, Warsaw, IN, USA.
J Biomech. 2016 Oct 3;49(14):3177-3184. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2016.07.040. Epub 2016 Aug 8.
A new six-degree-of-freedom (6-DOF) joint simulator has recently been developed which facilitates testing of implants under more realistic loading conditions than has been possible previously. However, typical wear testing can be very time-consuming, taking weeks or months to complete. A validated computational model is an ideal complement to these types of long-running tests. In this study, a computational counterpart to the new 6-DOF joint simulator was developed and validated. Total knee replacement components were evaluated in both physical and computational simulations, and joint mechanics were compared between the experiment and the model. Kinematic comparisons were carried out for two total knee replacement designs, under loading conditions representative of three different activities of daily living: deep knee bend, gait, and stepdown. The model accurately reproduced the motions obtained in the physical simulator, and appropriately differentiated between activities and between implant designs. Root-mean-square differences in anterior-posterior translations and internal-external rotations were less than 1.7mm and 1.4°, respectively, for both implant designs and all three dynamic activities. Contact area, and peak and average contact pressure predicted by the model matched experimental measurements with a root-mean-square accuracy of 20mm, 9MPa, and 1MPa, respectively. The computational model of the 6-DOF joint simulator will be a key tool in efficient evaluation of implant mechanics under loading conditions representative of the in vivo environment. These simulations may be used directly in comparison of devices, or may aid in facilitating optimal usage of the physical simulator through determining which activities and/or loading conditions best address specific clinical or design issues, for example, development of worst-case loading profiles for wear testing.
最近开发了一种新型六自由度(6-DOF)关节模拟器,它有助于在比以往更接近实际的加载条件下对植入物进行测试。然而,典型的磨损测试可能非常耗时,需要数周或数月才能完成。经过验证的计算模型是此类长期测试的理想补充。在本研究中,开发并验证了新型6-DOF关节模拟器的计算模型。对全膝关节置换组件进行了物理和计算模拟,并比较了实验和模型之间的关节力学。针对两种全膝关节置换设计,在代表三种不同日常生活活动(深度屈膝、步态和下台阶)的加载条件下进行了运动学比较。该模型准确再现了物理模拟器中获得的运动,并能恰当地区分不同活动以及不同植入物设计。对于两种植入物设计和所有三种动态活动,前后平移和内外旋转的均方根差异分别小于1.7毫米和1.4°。模型预测的接触面积、峰值和平均接触压力与实验测量值相匹配,均方根精度分别为20毫米、9兆帕和1兆帕。6-DOF关节模拟器的计算模型将成为在代表体内环境的加载条件下有效评估植入物力学的关键工具。这些模拟可直接用于比较不同设备,或通过确定哪些活动和/或加载条件最能解决特定临床或设计问题(例如,开发磨损测试的最坏情况加载曲线)来帮助优化物理模拟器的使用。