Suppr超能文献

比较 IgA 肾病肾小球微小 RNA 分析中不同标准化策略的比较。

Comparison of different normalization strategies for the analysis of glomerular microRNAs in IgA nephropathy.

机构信息

Department of Nephropathology, Friedrich Alexander University (FAU) Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany.

Institute of Pathology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2016 Aug 24;6:31992. doi: 10.1038/srep31992.

Abstract

Small nucleolar RNAs (snoRNAs) have been used for normalization in glomerular microRNA (miRNA) quantification without confirmation of validity. Our aim was to identify glomerular reference miRNAs in IgA nephropathy. We compared miRNAs in human paraffin-embedded renal biopsies from patients with cellular-crescentic IgA-GN (n = 5; crescentic IgA-GN) and non-crescentic IgA-GN (n = 5; IgA-GN) to mild interstitial nephritis without glomerular abnormalities (controls, n = 5). Laser-microdissected glomeruli were used for expression profiling of 762 miRNAs by low-density TaqMan arrays (cards A and B). The comparison of different normalization methods (GeNormPlus, NormFinder, global mean and snoRNAs) in crescentic IgA-GN, IgA-GN and controls yielded similar results. However, levels of significance and the range of relative expression differed. In median, two normalization methods demonstrated similar results. GeNormPlus and NormFinder gave different top ranked reference miRNAs. Stability ranking for snoRNAs varied between cards A and B. In conclusion, we suggest the geometric mean of the most stable reference miRNAs found in GeNormPlus (miR-26b-5p), NormFinder (miR-28-5p) and snoRNAs (RNU44) as reference. It should be considered that significant differences could be missed using one particular normalization method. As a starting point for glomerular miRNA studies in IgA nephropathy we provide a library of miRNAs.

摘要

小核仁 RNA(snoRNAs)已被用于肾小球 microRNA(miRNA)定量的标准化,而无需确认其有效性。我们的目的是在 IgA 肾病中鉴定肾小球参考 miRNA。我们比较了 5 例细胞性新月体 IgA 肾小球肾炎(新月体 IgA-GN)和 5 例非新月体 IgA 肾小球肾炎(IgA-GN)患者的人石蜡包埋肾活检组织以及 5 例无肾小球异常的轻度间质性肾炎患者(对照组)的 miRNA。使用低密度 TaqMan 阵列(卡片 A 和 B)对 762 个 miRNA 进行表达谱分析。在新月体 IgA-GN、IgA-GN 和对照组中比较不同的归一化方法(GeNormPlus、NormFinder、全局均值和 snoRNAs)得出了相似的结果。然而,统计学意义和相对表达范围存在差异。中位数表明两种归一化方法的结果相似。GeNormPlus 和 NormFinder 给出了不同的最佳参考 miRNA。卡片 A 和 B 之间 snoRNAs 的稳定性排名也存在差异。总之,我们建议使用 GeNormPlus(miR-26b-5p)、NormFinder(miR-28-5p)和 snoRNAs(RNU44)中 GeNormPlus 找到的最稳定参考 miRNA 的几何平均值作为参考。应该考虑到,使用特定的归一化方法可能会错过显著差异。作为 IgA 肾病肾小球 miRNA 研究的起点,我们提供了一个 miRNA 文库。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/925f/4995590/205bb2df7fba/srep31992-f1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验