Niu Lu, Luo Dan, Liu Ying, Xiao Shuiyuan
Department of Social Medicine and Health Management, Xiangya School of Public Health, Central South University, Changsha 410078, China.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2016 Aug 20;13(8):834. doi: 10.3390/ijerph13080834.
The present study was designed to assess the quality of Chinese-language Internet-based information on HIV/AIDS.
We entered the following search terms, in Chinese, into Baidu and Sogou: "HIV/AIDS", "symptoms", and "treatment", and evaluated the first 50 hits of each query using the Minervation validation instrument (LIDA tool) and DISCERN instrument.
Of the 900 hits identified, 85 websites were included in this study. The overall score of the LIDA tool was 63.7%; the mean score of accessibility, usability, and reliability was 82.2%, 71.5%, and 27.3%, respectively. Of the top 15 sites according to the LIDA score, the mean DISCERN score was calculated at 43.1 (95% confidence intervals (CI) = 37.7-49.5). Noncommercial websites showed higher DISCERN scores than commercial websites; whereas commercial websites were more likely to be found in the first 20 links obtained from each search engine than the noncommercial websites.
In general, the HIV/AIDS related Chinese-language websites have poor reliability, although their accessibility and usability are fair. In addition, the treatment information presented on Chinese-language websites is far from sufficient. There is an imperative need for professionals and specialized institutes to improve the comprehensiveness of web-based information related to HIV/AIDS.
本研究旨在评估基于互联网的中文艾滋病信息质量。
我们在百度和搜狗中输入以下中文搜索词:“艾滋病毒/艾滋病”、“症状”和“治疗”,并使用Minervation验证工具(LIDA工具)和DISCERN工具对每个查询的前50个搜索结果进行评估。
在识别出的900个搜索结果中,本研究纳入了85个网站。LIDA工具的总体得分为63.7%;可及性、可用性和可靠性的平均得分分别为82.2%、71.5%和27.3%。根据LIDA得分排名前15的网站,DISCERN平均得分为43.1(95%置信区间(CI)=37.7 - 49.5)。非商业网站的DISCERN得分高于商业网站;而商业网站比非商业网站更有可能出现在每个搜索引擎获得的前20个链接中。
总体而言,与艾滋病毒/艾滋病相关的中文网站可靠性较差,尽管其可及性和可用性尚可。此外,中文网站上提供的治疗信息远远不够。专业人士和专业机构迫切需要提高与艾滋病毒/艾滋病相关的网络信息的全面性。