Watkins Jaclyn C, Yang Eric J, Muto Michael G, Feltmate Colleen M, Berkowitz Ross S, Horowitz Neil S, Syngal Sapna, Yurgelun Matthew B, Chittenden Anu, Hornick Jason L, Crum Christopher P, Sholl Lynette M, Howitt Brooke E
Departments of Pathology (J.C.W., J.L.H., C.P.C, L.M.S., B.E.H.) Gynecologic Oncology (M.C.M., C.M.F., R.S.B., N.S.H.), Brigham And Women's Hospital Department of Medical Oncology (S.S., M.B.Y., A.C.), Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA Department of Pathology (E.J.Y.), Stanford University Medical Center, Palo Alto, CA.
Int J Gynecol Pathol. 2017 Mar;36(2):115-127. doi: 10.1097/PGP.0000000000000312.
Although consensus has yet to be reached on universal mismatch-repair (MMR) protein immunohistochemical (IHC) screening for Lynch syndrome (LS) in endometrial cancer (EC), an increasing number of institutions have adopted universal screening protocols similar to those used for colorectal carcinoma. Here we describe our institution's experience with a prospective universal screening protocol in which all ECs resected over a period of 19 months (n=242) were screened for MLH1, PMS2, MSH2, and MSH6 deficiencies using IHC, followed by MLH1 promoter methylation testing when appropriate. When consent was obtained, tumor samples underwent next-generation sequencing. A total of 11 unmethylated MMR-deficient cases (4.5% of cohort) were identified through IHC screening. Germline testing was performed in 10 cases and confirmed LS in 4 patients (1.7% of cohort). Of our 4 confirmed LS cases, 1 did not meet traditional LS screening criteria (eg, age below 50 y, Revised Bethesda criteria). In addition, universal screening identified 6 germline-negative MMR-deficient nonmethylated cases, 4 of which occurred in women older than 50. Although our next-generation sequencing data suggest somatic mutations in 4 of these cases, it is possible that these cases may represent cases of "Lynch-like syndrome." We conclude that a subset of LS cases could be missed using traditional screening guidelines. The value of screening for Lynch-like syndrome has yet to be determined. Although the cost-effectiveness of universal screening in EC has yet to be elucidated, we conclude that universal IHC screening is currently a reasonable, and arguably superior, approach to screening for LS.
尽管对于子宫内膜癌(EC)中林奇综合征(LS)的普遍错配修复(MMR)蛋白免疫组化(IHC)筛查尚未达成共识,但越来越多的机构采用了类似于用于结直肠癌的普遍筛查方案。在此,我们描述了我们机构采用前瞻性普遍筛查方案的经验,即在19个月期间切除的所有EC(n = 242)均使用IHC筛查MLH1、PMS2、MSH2和MSH6缺陷,必要时进行MLH1启动子甲基化检测。在获得同意后,肿瘤样本进行了二代测序。通过IHC筛查共鉴定出11例未甲基化的MMR缺陷病例(占队列的4.5%)。对10例进行了种系检测,4例患者确诊为LS(占队列的1.7%)。在我们确诊的4例LS病例中,1例不符合传统的LS筛查标准(例如,年龄低于50岁,修订的贝塞斯达标准)。此外,普遍筛查还发现了6例种系阴性的MMR缺陷非甲基化病例,其中4例发生在50岁以上的女性中。尽管我们的二代测序数据表明其中4例存在体细胞突变,但这些病例有可能代表“林奇样综合征”病例。我们得出结论,使用传统筛查指南可能会漏诊一部分LS病例。林奇样综合征筛查的价值尚未确定。尽管EC普遍筛查的成本效益尚未阐明,但我们得出结论,目前普遍IHC筛查是一种合理且可说是更好的LS筛查方法。