Duester Lars, Fabricius Anne-Lena, Jakobtorweihen Sven, Philippe Allan, Weigl Florian, Wimmer Andreas, Schuster Michael, Nazar Muhammad Faizan
Department G2-Aquatic Chemistry, Federal Institute of Hydrology, Am Mainzer Tor 1, 56068, Koblenz, Germany.
Thermal and Separation Processes, Hamburg University of Technology, Eißendorfer Straße 38, 21073, Hamburg, Germany.
Anal Bioanal Chem. 2016 Nov;408(27):7551-7557. doi: 10.1007/s00216-016-9873-5. Epub 2016 Aug 24.
Coacervate-based techniques are intensively used in environmental analytical chemistry to enrich and extract different kinds of analytes. Most methods focus on the total content or the speciation of inorganic and organic substances. Size fractionation is less commonly addressed. Within coacervate-based techniques, cloud point extraction (CPE) is characterized by a phase separation of non-ionic surfactants dispersed in an aqueous solution when the respective cloud point temperature is exceeded. In this context, the feature article raises the following question: May CPE in future studies serve as a key tool (i) to enrich and extract nanoparticles (NPs) from complex environmental matrices prior to analyses and (ii) to preserve the colloidal status of unstable environmental samples? With respect to engineered NPs, a significant gap between environmental concentrations and size- and element-specific analytical capabilities is still visible. CPE may support efforts to overcome this "concentration gap" via the analyte enrichment. In addition, most environmental colloidal systems are known to be unstable, dynamic, and sensitive to changes of the environmental conditions during sampling and sample preparation. This delivers a so far unsolved "sample preparation dilemma" in the analytical process. The authors are of the opinion that CPE-based methods have the potential to preserve the colloidal status of these instable samples. Focusing on NPs, this feature article aims to support the discussion on the creation of a convention called the "CPE extractable fraction" by connecting current knowledge on CPE mechanisms and on available applications, via the uncertainties visible and modeling approaches available, with potential future benefits from CPE protocols.
基于凝聚层的技术在环境分析化学中被广泛用于富集和提取各类分析物。大多数方法关注无机和有机物质的总量或形态。尺寸分级则较少被涉及。在基于凝聚层的技术中,浊点萃取(CPE)的特点是当超过各自的浊点温度时,分散在水溶液中的非离子表面活性剂会发生相分离。在此背景下,这篇专题文章提出了以下问题:在未来的研究中,浊点萃取能否作为一种关键工具:(i)在分析之前从复杂的环境基质中富集和提取纳米颗粒(NPs);(ii)保持不稳定环境样品的胶体状态?对于工程纳米颗粒,环境浓度与尺寸和元素特异性分析能力之间仍存在明显差距。浊点萃取可通过分析物富集来支持克服这一“浓度差距”的努力。此外,众所周知,大多数环境胶体系统不稳定、动态且对采样和样品制备过程中的环境条件变化敏感。这在分析过程中带来了一个迄今未解决的“样品制备困境”。作者认为基于浊点萃取的方法有潜力保持这些不稳定样品的胶体状态。聚焦于纳米颗粒,这篇专题文章旨在通过将当前关于浊点萃取机制和现有应用的知识,与可见的不确定性和可用的建模方法以及浊点萃取方案潜在的未来益处相联系,来支持关于创建一个名为“浊点萃取可萃取部分”的公约的讨论。