Cattepoel Susann, Gaida Annette, Kropf Alain, Nolte Marc W, Bolli Reinhard, Miescher Sylvia M
CSL Behring AG, Bern, Switzerland.
CSL Behring GmbH, Marburg, Germany.
PLoS One. 2016 Aug 25;11(8):e0161826. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0161826. eCollection 2016.
In relation to the recent trials of Intravenous Immunoglobulin (IVIG) in Alzheimer's Disease (AD) it was demonstrated that different IgG preparations contain varying amounts of natural anti-amyloid β (Aβ) antibodies as measured by ELISA. We therefore investigated the relevance of ELISA data for measuring low-affinity antibodies, such as anti-Aβ. We analysed the binding of different commercial Immunoglobulin G (IgG) preparations to Aβ, actin and tetanus toxoid in different binding assays to further investigate the possible cause for observed differences in binding to Aβ and actin between different IgG preparations. We show that the differences of commercial IgG preparations in binding to Aβ and actin in ELISA assays are artefactual and only evident in in vitro binding assays. In functional assays and in vivo animal studies the different IVIG preparations exhibited very similar potency. ELISA data alone are not appropriate to analyse and rank the binding capacity of low-affinity antibodies to Aβ or other endogenous self-antigens contained in IgG preparations. Additional analytical methods should be adopted to complement ELISA data.
关于近期静脉注射免疫球蛋白(IVIG)治疗阿尔茨海默病(AD)的试验,结果表明,通过酶联免疫吸附测定(ELISA)检测,不同的免疫球蛋白G(IgG)制剂含有不同量的天然抗淀粉样β蛋白(Aβ)抗体。因此,我们研究了ELISA数据用于测量低亲和力抗体(如抗Aβ)的相关性。我们在不同的结合试验中分析了不同商业IgG制剂与Aβ、肌动蛋白和破伤风类毒素的结合情况,以进一步探究不同IgG制剂与Aβ和肌动蛋白结合存在差异的可能原因。我们发现,ELISA试验中商业IgG制剂与Aβ和肌动蛋白结合的差异是人为造成的,仅在体外结合试验中明显。在功能试验和体内动物研究中,不同的IVIG制剂表现出非常相似的效力。仅靠ELISA数据不足以分析和排序低亲和力抗体与Aβ或IgG制剂中包含的其他内源性自身抗原的结合能力。应采用其他分析方法来补充ELISA数据。