Dewan Michael C, Lim Jaims, Morgan Clinton D, Gannon Stephen R, Shannon Chevis N, Wellons John C, Naftel Robert P
Department of Neurosurgery, Vanderbilt University, Division of Pediatric Neurosurgery, Monroe Carell Jr. Children's Hospital at Vanderbilt, Nashville, Tennessee.
J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2016 Dec;25(6):655-662. doi: 10.3171/2016.6.PEDS1675. Epub 2016 Aug 26.
OBJECTIVE Endoscopic third ventriculostomy with choroid plexus cauterization (ETV/CPC) offers an alternative to shunt treatment for infantile hydrocephalus. Diagnosing treatment failure is dependent on infantile hydrocephalus metrics, including head circumference, fontanel quality, and ventricle size. However, it is not clear to what degree these metrics should be expected to change after ETV/CPC. Using these clinical metrics, the authors present and analyze the decision making in cases of ETV/CPC failure. METHODS Infantile hydrocephalus metrics, including bulging fontanel, head circumference z-score, and frontal and occipital horn ratio (FOHR), were compared between ETV/CPC failures and successes. Treatment outcome predictive values of metrics individually and in combination were calculated. RESULTS Forty-four patients (57% males, median age 1.2 months) underwent ETV/CPC for hydrocephalus; of these patients, 25 (57%) experienced failure at a median time of 51 days postoperatively. Patients experiencing failure were younger than those experiencing successful treatment (0.8 vs 3.9 months, p = 0.01). During outpatient follow-up, bulging anterior fontanel, progressive macrocephaly, and enlarging ventricles each demonstrated a positive predictive value (PPV) of no less than 71%, but a bulging anterior fontanel remained the most predictive indicator of ETV/CPC failure, with a PPV of 100%, negative predictive value of 73%, and sensitivity of 72%. The highest PPVs and specificities existed when the clinical metrics were present in combination, although sensitivities decreased expectedly. Only 48% of failures were diagnosed on the basis all 3 hydrocephalus metrics, while only 37% of successes were negative for all 3 metrics. In the remaining 57% of patients, a diagnosis of success or failure was made in the presence of discordant data. CONCLUSIONS Successful ETV/CPC for infantile hydrocephalus was evaluated in relation to fontanel status, head growth, and change in ventricular size. In most patients, a designation of failure or success was made in the setting of discordant data.
目的 内镜下第三脑室造瘘术联合脉络丛烧灼术(ETV/CPC)为婴儿脑积水的分流治疗提供了一种替代方案。诊断治疗失败取决于婴儿脑积水的指标,包括头围、囟门情况和脑室大小。然而,尚不清楚这些指标在ETV/CPC术后应预期有多大程度的变化。作者运用这些临床指标,展示并分析了ETV/CPC失败病例中的决策过程。方法 比较了ETV/CPC失败组和成功组的婴儿脑积水指标,包括囟门膨隆、头围Z评分以及额角与枕角比值(FOHR)。计算了各指标单独及联合时的治疗结果预测值。结果 44例患者(57%为男性,中位年龄1.2个月)因脑积水接受了ETV/CPC治疗;其中25例(57%)在术后中位时间51天出现失败。失败患者比成功治疗患者年龄更小(0.8个月对3.9个月,p = 0.01)。在门诊随访期间,前囟膨隆、进行性巨头畸形和脑室扩大的阳性预测值(PPV)均不低于71%,但前囟膨隆仍是ETV/CPC失败的最具预测性指标,PPV为100%,阴性预测值为73%,敏感性为72%。当临床指标联合存在时,PPV和特异性最高,不过敏感性如预期降低。仅48%的失败病例是基于所有3项脑积水指标诊断出来的,而仅37%的成功病例这3项指标均为阴性。在其余57%的患者中,在数据不一致的情况下做出了成功或失败的诊断。结论 针对婴儿脑积水的ETV/CPC成功与否,是根据囟门状态、头部生长和脑室大小变化来评估的。在大多数患者中,是在数据不一致的情况下做出失败或成功的判定。