van Loo Christiana M T, Okely Anthony D, Batterham Marijka J, Hinkley Trina, Ekelund Ulf, Brage Søren, Reilly John J, Jones Rachel A, Janssen Xanne, Cliff Dylan P
Early Start Research Institute and Illawarra Health and Medical Research Institute, Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Wollongong, Australia.
Early Start Research Institute and Illawarra Health and Medical Research Institute, Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Wollongong, Australia.
J Sci Med Sport. 2017 Mar;20(3):273-277. doi: 10.1016/j.jsams.2016.08.008. Epub 2016 Aug 12.
To validate activPAL3™ (AP3) for classifying postural allocation, estimating time spent in postures and examining the number of breaks in sedentary behaviour (SB) in 5-12 year-olds.
Laboratory-based validation study.
Fifty-seven children completed 15 sedentary, light- and moderate-to-vigorous intensity activities. Direct observation (DO) was used as the criterion measure. The accuracy of AP3 was examined using a confusion matrix, equivalence testing, Bland-Altman procedures and a paired t-test for 5-8y and 9-12y.
Sensitivity of AP3 was 86.8%, 82.5% and 85.3% for sitting/lying, standing, and stepping, respectively, in 5-8y and 95.3%, 81.5% and 85.1%, respectively, in 9-12y. Time estimates of AP3 were equivalent to DO for sitting/lying in 9-12y and stepping in all ages, but not for sitting/lying in 5-12y and standing in all ages. Underestimation of sitting/lying time was smaller in 9-12y (1.4%, limits of agreement [LoA]: -13.8 to 11.1%) compared to 5-8y (12.6%, LoA: -39.8 to 14.7%). Underestimation for stepping time was small (5-8y: 6.5%, LoA: -18.3 to 5.3%; 9-12y: 7.6%, LoA: -16.8 to 1.6%). Considerable overestimation was found for standing (5-8y: 36.8%, LoA: -16.3 to 89.8%; 9-12y: 19.3%, LoA: -1.6 to 36.9%). SB breaks were significantly overestimated (5-8y: 53.2%, 9-12y: 28.3%, p<0.001).
AP3 showed acceptable accuracy for classifying postures, however estimates of time spent standing were consistently overestimated and individual error was considerable. Estimates of sitting/lying were more accurate for 9-12y. Stepping time was accurately estimated for all ages. SB breaks were significantly overestimated, although the absolute difference was larger in 5-8y. Surveillance applications of AP3 would be acceptable, however, individual level applications might be less accurate.
验证activPAL3™(AP3)在对5至12岁儿童的姿势分配进行分类、估计各姿势所花费时间以及检查久坐行为(SB)中断次数方面的有效性。
基于实验室的验证研究。
57名儿童完成了15项久坐、轻度和中度至剧烈强度的活动。直接观察(DO)用作标准测量方法。使用混淆矩阵、等效性检验、Bland-Altman程序以及针对5至8岁和9至12岁儿童的配对t检验来检查AP3的准确性。
在5至8岁儿童中,AP3对坐/躺、站立和行走的敏感性分别为86.8%、82.5%和85.3%;在9至12岁儿童中,分别为95.3%、81.5%和85.1%。在9至12岁儿童中,AP3对坐/躺时间的估计与DO等效,在所有年龄段中对行走时间的估计也与DO等效,但在5至12岁儿童中对坐/躺时间的估计以及在所有年龄段中对站立时间的估计与DO不等效。与5至8岁儿童(12.6%,一致性界限[LoA]:-39.8至14.7%)相比,9至12岁儿童坐/躺时间的低估程度较小(1.4%,LoA:-13.8至11.1%)。行走时间的低估程度较小(5至8岁:6.5%,LoA:-18.3至5.3%;9至12岁:7.6%,LoA:-16.8至1.6%)。发现站立时间有相当大的高估(5至8岁:36.8%,LoA:-16.3至89.8%;9至12岁:19.3%,LoA:-1.6至36.9%)。SB中断次数被显著高估(5至8岁:53.2%,9至12岁:28.3%,p<0.001)。
AP3在姿势分类方面显示出可接受的准确性,然而,站立时间的估计始终被高估,且个体误差相当大。9至12岁儿童坐/躺时间的估计更准确。所有年龄段的行走时间都能被准确估计。SB中断次数被显著高估,尽管5至8岁儿童的绝对差异更大。AP3在监测应用中是可以接受的,然而,在个体层面的应用可能不太准确。