Pidaparthi Lalitha, Kotha Anitha, Aleti Venkat Reddy, Kohat Abhijeet Kumar, Kandadai Mridula R, Turaga Suryaprabha, Shaik Jabeen A, Alladi Suvarna, Kanikannan Meena A, Rupam Borgohain, Kaul Subhash
Department of Neurology, Nizam's Institute of Medical Sciences (NIMS), Hyderabad, Telangana, India.
Ann Indian Acad Neurol. 2016 Jul-Sep;19(3):351-5. doi: 10.4103/0972-2327.179976.
It is a well-known fact that very few patients of stroke arrive at the hospital within the window period of thrombolysis. Even among those who do, not all receive thrombolytic therapy.
The objectives of this study were to determine the proportion of early arrival ischemic strokes (within 6 h of stroke onset) in our hospital and to evaluate the causes of nonadministration of intravenous and/or intraarterial thrombolysis in them.
Data of all early arrival acute stroke patients between January 2010 and January 2015 were included. Factors determining nonadministration of intravenous and/or intraarterial thrombolysis in early arrival strokes were analyzed.
Out of 2,593 stroke patients, only 145 (5.6%) patients presented within 6 h of stroke onset and among them 118 (81.4%) patients had ischemic stroke and 27 (18.6%) patients had hemorrhagic stroke. A total of 89/118 (75.4%) patients were thrombolyzed. The reasons for nonadministration of thrombolysis in the remaining 29 patients were analyzed, which included unavoidable factors in 8/29 patients [massive infarct (N = 4), hemorrhagic infarct (N = 1), gastrointestinal bleed (N = 1), oral anticoagulant usage with prolonged international normalized ratio (INR) (N = 1), and recent cataract surgery (N = 1)]. Avoidable factors were found for 21/29 patients, include nonaffordability (N = 7), fear of bleed (N = 4), rapidly improving symptoms (N = 4), mild stroke (N = 2), delayed neurologist referral within the hospital (N = 2), and logistic difficulty in organizing endovascular treatment (N = 2).
One-fourth of early ischemic stroke patients in our study were not thrombolyzed even though they arrived within the window period. The majority of the reasons for nonadministration of thrombolysis were potentially preventable, such as nonaffordability, intrahospital delay, and nonavailability of newer endovascular interventions.
众所周知,很少有中风患者在溶栓窗口期内抵达医院。即使在那些抵达医院的患者中,也并非所有人都接受了溶栓治疗。
本研究的目的是确定我院早期抵达的缺血性中风(中风发作后6小时内)患者的比例,并评估他们未接受静脉和/或动脉溶栓治疗的原因。
纳入2010年1月至2015年1月期间所有早期抵达的急性中风患者的数据。分析了决定早期抵达中风患者未接受静脉和/或动脉溶栓治疗的因素。
在2593例中风患者中,只有145例(5.6%)在中风发作后6小时内就诊,其中118例(81.4%)为缺血性中风,27例(18.6%)为出血性中风。共有89/118例(75.4%)患者接受了溶栓治疗。分析了其余29例患者未接受溶栓治疗的原因,其中8/29例患者存在不可避免的因素[大面积梗死(4例)、出血性梗死(1例)、胃肠道出血(1例)、口服抗凝剂使用且国际标准化比值(INR)延长(1例)以及近期白内障手术(1例)]。在21/29例患者中发现了可避免的因素,包括费用负担不起(7例)、害怕出血(4例)、症状迅速改善(4例)、轻度中风(2例)、在医院内神经科转诊延迟(2例)以及组织血管内治疗存在后勤困难(2例)。
在我们的研究中,四分之一的早期缺血性中风患者即使在窗口期内抵达医院也未接受溶栓治疗。未进行溶栓治疗的大多数原因是潜在可预防的,如费用负担不起、医院内延误以及缺乏更新的血管内干预措施。