Moriarty Patrick M, Parhofer Klaus G, Babirak Stephan P, Cornier Marc-Andre, Duell P Barton, Hohenstein Bernd, Leebmann Josef, Ramlow Wolfgang, Schettler Volker, Simha Vinaya, Steinhagen-Thiessen Elisabeth, Thompson Paul D, Vogt Anja, von Stritzky Berndt, Du Yunling, Manvelian Garen
Division of Clinical Pharmacology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Kansas Medical Center, 3901 Rainbow Blvd, Kansas City, KS 66160, USA
Medical Department II, Grosshadern, University Munich, Marchioninistraße 15, 81377 Munich, Germany.
Eur Heart J. 2016 Dec 21;37(48):3588-3595. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehw388. Epub 2016 Aug 29.
AIM: To evaluate the effect of alirocumab on frequency of standard apheresis treatments [weekly or every 2 weeks (Q2W)] in heterozygous familial hypercholesterolaemia (HeFH). METHODS AND RESULTS: ODYSSEY ESCAPE (NCT02326220) was a double-blind study in 62 HeFH patients undergoing regular weekly or Q2W lipoprotein apheresis. Patients were randomly assigned (2:1, respectively) to receive alirocumab 150 mg (n = 41) or placebo (n = 21) Q2W subcutaneously for 18 weeks. From day 1 to week 6, apheresis rate was fixed according to the patient's established schedule; from weeks 7 to 18, apheresis rate was adjusted based on the patient's low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) response in a blinded fashion. Apheresis was not performed when the LDL-C value was ≥30% lower than the baseline (pre-apheresis) value. The primary efficacy endpoint was the rate of apheresis treatments over 12 weeks (weeks 7-18), standardized to number of planned treatments. In the alirocumab group the least square (LS) mean ± SE (95% confidence interval [CI]) per cent change in pre-apheresis LDL-C from baseline at week 6 was -53.7 ± 2.3 (-58.2 to - 49.2) compared with 1.6 ± 3.1 (-4.7 to 7.9) in the placebo group. The primary efficacy endpoint showed statistically significant benefit in favour of alirocumab (Hodges-Lehmann median estimate of treatment difference: 0.75; 95% CI 0.67-0.83; P < 0.0001). Therefore, alirocumab-treated patients had a 0.75 (75%) additional reduction in the standardized rate of apheresis treatments vs. placebo-treated patients. During this period, 63.4% of patients on alirocumab avoided all and 92.7% avoided at least half of the apheresis treatments. Adverse event rates were similar (75.6% of patients on alirocumab vs. 76.2% on placebo). CONCLUSIONS: Lipoprotein apheresis was discontinued in 63.4% of patients on alirocumab who were previously undergoing regular apheresis, and the rate was at least halved in 92.7% of patients. Alirocumab was generally safe and well tolerated.
目的:评估阿利西尤单抗对杂合子家族性高胆固醇血症(HeFH)患者标准血液成分单采治疗频率(每周或每2周一次)的影响。 方法与结果:ODYSSEY ESCAPE(NCT02326220)是一项双盲研究,纳入62例接受定期每周或每2周一次脂蛋白单采的HeFH患者。患者按2:1随机分组,分别皮下注射阿利西尤单抗150mg(n = 41)或安慰剂(n = 21),每2周一次,共18周。从第1天至第6周,单采频率根据患者既定方案确定;从第7周开始至第18周,根据患者低密度脂蛋白胆固醇(LDL-C)反应以盲法调整单采频率。当LDL-C值比基线(单采前)值降低≥30%时,不进行单采。主要疗效终点为12周(第7 - 18周)内单采治疗的频率,标准化为计划治疗次数。在阿利西尤单抗组,第6周时单采前LDL-C较基线的最小二乘(LS)均值±标准误(95%置信区间[CI])变化百分比为-53.7±2.3(-58.2至-49.2),而安慰剂组为1.6±3.1(-4.7至7.9)。主要疗效终点显示阿利西尤单抗具有统计学显著优势(治疗差异的霍奇斯 - 莱曼中位数估计值:0.75;95% CI 0.67 - 0.83;P < 0.0001)。因此,与安慰剂治疗的患者相比,接受阿利西尤单抗治疗的患者标准化单采治疗频率额外降低了0.75(75%)。在此期间,63.4%接受阿利西尤单抗治疗的患者避免了所有单采治疗,92.7%避免了至少一半的单采治疗。不良事件发生率相似(接受阿利西尤单抗治疗的患者为75.6%,接受安慰剂治疗的患者为76.2%)。 结论:在之前接受定期单采的患者中,63.4%接受阿利西尤单抗治疗的患者停止了脂蛋白单采,92.7%患者的单采频率至少减半。阿利西尤单抗总体安全且耐受性良好。
Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2025-2-22
Curr Atheroscler Rep. 2025-2-15
Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2023-11-9
Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care. 2024-2-9
Diagnostics (Basel). 2023-6-7
J Clin Lipidol. 2016
J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2015-8
N Engl J Med. 2015-3-15