成人肾移植的免疫抑制治疗:一项系统评价与经济模型

Immunosuppressive therapy for kidney transplantation in adults: a systematic review and economic model.

作者信息

Jones-Hughes Tracey, Snowsill Tristan, Haasova Marcela, Coelho Helen, Crathorne Louise, Cooper Chris, Mujica-Mota Ruben, Peters Jaime, Varley-Campbell Jo, Huxley Nicola, Moore Jason, Allwood Matt, Lowe Jenny, Hyde Chris, Hoyle Martin, Bond Mary, Anderson Rob

机构信息

Peninsula Technology Assessment Group (PenTAG), University of Exeter, Exeter, UK.

Exeter Kidney Unit, Royal Devon and Exeter Foundation Trust Hospital, Exeter, UK.

出版信息

Health Technol Assess. 2016 Aug;20(62):1-594. doi: 10.3310/hta20620.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

End-stage renal disease is a long-term irreversible decline in kidney function requiring renal replacement therapy: kidney transplantation, haemodialysis or peritoneal dialysis. The preferred option is kidney transplantation, followed by immunosuppressive therapy (induction and maintenance therapy) to reduce the risk of kidney rejection and prolong graft survival.

OBJECTIVES

To review and update the evidence for the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of basiliximab (BAS) (Simulect(®), Novartis Pharmaceuticals UK Ltd) and rabbit anti-human thymocyte immunoglobulin (rATG) (Thymoglobulin(®), Sanofi) as induction therapy, and immediate-release tacrolimus (TAC) (Adoport(®), Sandoz; Capexion(®), Mylan; Modigraf(®), Astellas Pharma; Perixis(®), Accord Healthcare; Prograf(®), Astellas Pharma; Tacni(®), Teva; Vivadex(®), Dexcel Pharma), prolonged-release tacrolimus (Advagraf(®) Astellas Pharma), belatacept (BEL) (Nulojix(®), Bristol-Myers Squibb), mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) (Arzip(®), Zentiva; CellCept(®), Roche Products; Myfenax(®), Teva), mycophenolate sodium (MPS) (Myfortic(®), Novartis Pharmaceuticals UK Ltd), sirolimus (SRL) (Rapamune(®), Pfizer) and everolimus (EVL) (Certican(®), Novartis) as maintenance therapy in adult renal transplantation.

METHODS

Clinical effectiveness searches were conducted until 18 November 2014 in MEDLINE (via Ovid), EMBASE (via Ovid), Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (via Wiley Online Library) and Web of Science (via ISI), Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects and Health Technology Assessment (The Cochrane Library via Wiley Online Library) and Health Management Information Consortium (via Ovid). Cost-effectiveness searches were conducted until 18 November 2014 using a costs or economic literature search filter in MEDLINE (via Ovid), EMBASE (via Ovid), NHS Economic Evaluation Database (via Wiley Online Library), Web of Science (via ISI), Health Economic Evaluations Database (via Wiley Online Library) and the American Economic Association's electronic bibliography (via EconLit, EBSCOhost). Included studies were selected according to predefined methods and criteria. A random-effects model was used to analyse clinical effectiveness data (odds ratios for binary data and mean differences for continuous data). Network meta-analyses were undertaken within a Bayesian framework. A new discrete time-state transition economic model (semi-Markov) was developed, with acute rejection, graft function (GRF) and new-onset diabetes mellitus used to extrapolate graft survival. Recipients were assumed to be in one of three health states: functioning graft, graft loss or death.

RESULTS

Eighty-nine randomised controlled trials (RCTs), of variable quality, were included. For induction therapy, no treatment appeared more effective than another in reducing graft loss or mortality. Compared with placebo/no induction, rATG and BAS appeared more effective in reducing biopsy-proven acute rejection (BPAR) and BAS appeared more effective at improving GRF. For maintenance therapy, no treatment was better for all outcomes and no treatment appeared most effective at reducing graft loss. BEL + MMF appeared more effective than TAC + MMF and SRL + MMF at reducing mortality. MMF + CSA (ciclosporin), TAC + MMF, SRL + TAC, TAC + AZA (azathioprine) and EVL + CSA appeared more effective than CSA + AZA and EVL + MPS at reducing BPAR. SRL + AZA, TAC + AZA, TAC + MMF and BEL + MMF appeared to improve GRF compared with CSA + AZA and MMF + CSA. In the base-case deterministic and probabilistic analyses, BAS, MMF and TAC were predicted to be cost-effective at £20,000 and £30,000 per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY). When comparing all regimens, only BAS + TAC + MMF was cost-effective at £20,000 and £30,000 per QALY.

LIMITATIONS

For included trials, there was substantial methodological heterogeneity, few trials reported follow-up beyond 1 year, and there were insufficient data to perform subgroup analysis. Treatment discontinuation and switching were not modelled.

FUTURE WORK

High-quality, better-reported, longer-term RCTs are needed. Ideally, these would be sufficiently powered for subgroup analysis and include health-related quality of life as an outcome.

CONCLUSION

Only a regimen of BAS induction followed by maintenance with TAC and MMF is likely to be cost-effective at £20,000-30,000 per QALY.

STUDY REGISTRATION

This study is registered as PROSPERO CRD42014013189.

FUNDING

The National Institute for Health Research Health Technology Assessment programme.

摘要

背景

终末期肾病是一种需要肾脏替代治疗的长期不可逆的肾功能衰退,肾脏替代治疗包括肾移植、血液透析或腹膜透析。首选方案是肾移植,随后进行免疫抑制治疗(诱导和维持治疗)以降低肾脏排斥反应的风险并延长移植物存活时间。

目的

综述并更新巴利昔单抗(BAS)(舒莱,诺华制药英国有限公司)和兔抗人胸腺细胞免疫球蛋白(rATG)(即复宁,赛诺菲)作为诱导治疗,以及速释他克莫司(TAC)(普乐可复,山德士;克帕松,迈兰;莫迪格拉夫,安斯泰来制药;佩里西斯,阿可制药;普乐可复,安斯泰来制药;他克尼,梯瓦;维瓦德克斯,德凯尔制药)、缓释他克莫司(安斯泰来制药)、贝拉西普(BEL)(诺而赞,百时美施贵宝)、霉酚酸酯(MMF)(阿齐普,赞邦;骁悉,罗氏产品;麦考酚钠,梯瓦)、麦考酚钠(MPS)(米芙,诺华制药英国有限公司)、西罗莫司(SRL)(雷帕鸣,辉瑞)和依维莫司(EVL)(诺复伦,诺华)作为成人肾移植维持治疗的临床有效性和成本效益的证据。

方法

截至2014年11月18日,在MEDLINE(通过Ovid)、EMBASE(通过Ovid)、Cochrane对照试验中心注册库(通过Wiley在线图书馆)和科学引文索引(通过ISI)、Cochrane系统评价数据库、效果评价文摘数据库和卫生技术评估数据库(通过Wiley在线图书馆的Cochrane图书馆)以及卫生管理信息联盟(通过Ovid)中进行临床有效性检索。截至2014年11月18日,在MEDLINE(通过Ovid)、EMBASE(通过Ovid)、英国国家卫生服务体系经济评价数据库(通过Wiley在线图书馆)、科学引文索引(通过ISI)、卫生经济评价数据库(通过Wiley在线图书馆)和美国经济协会电子文献目录(通过EconLit,EBSCOhost)中使用成本或经济文献检索过滤器进行成本效益检索。纳入的研究根据预定义的方法和标准进行选择。采用随机效应模型分析临床有效性数据(二分类数据的比值比和连续数据的均值差)。在贝叶斯框架内进行网状Meta分析。开发了一种新的离散时间状态转换经济模型(半马尔可夫模型),用急性排斥反应、移植肾功能(GRF)和新发糖尿病来推断移植物存活情况。假设接受者处于三种健康状态之一:移植物功能正常、移植物丢失或死亡。

结果

纳入了89项质量参差不齐的随机对照试验(RCT)。对于诱导治疗,在降低移植物丢失或死亡率方面,没有一种治疗方法比另一种更有效。与安慰剂/无诱导治疗相比,rATG和BAS在降低活检证实的急性排斥反应(BPAR)方面似乎更有效,且BAS在改善GRF方面似乎更有效。对于维持治疗,没有一种治疗方法对所有结局都更好,也没有一种治疗方法在降低移植物丢失方面似乎最有效。在降低死亡率方面,BEL+MMF似乎比TAC+MMF和SRL+MMF更有效。在降低BPAR方面,MMF+环孢素(CSA)、TAC+MMF、SRL+TAC、TAC+硫唑嘌呤(AZA)和EVL+CSA似乎比CSA+AZA和EVL+MPS更有效。与CSA+AZA和MMF+CSA相比,SRL+AZA、TAC+AZA、TAC+MMF和BEL+MMF似乎能改善GRF。在基础病例确定性和概率分析中,预计BAS、MMF和TAC在每质量调整生命年(QALY)20,000英镑和30,000英镑时具有成本效益。在比较所有治疗方案时,只有BAS+TAC+MMF在每QALY 20,000英镑和30,000英镑时具有成本效益。

局限性

对于纳入的试验,存在大量方法学异质性,很少有试验报告1年以上的随访情况,且数据不足以进行亚组分析。未对治疗中断和换药进行建模。

未来工作

需要高质量、报告更完善、长期的RCT。理想情况下,这些试验应有足够的样本量进行亚组分析,并将健康相关生活质量作为一项结局指标。

结论

只有采用BAS诱导治疗后再用TAC和MMF维持治疗的方案在每QALY 20,000 - 30,000英镑时可能具有成本效益。

研究注册

本研究注册为PROSPERO CRD42014013189。

资助

英国国家卫生与临床优化研究所卫生技术评估项目。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索