Suppr超能文献

德尔尼多与圣托马斯心脏停搏液方案:单中心关于主动脉交叉阻断后除颤率的回顾性分析

del Nido versus St. Thomas Cardioplegia Solutions: A Single-Center Retrospective Analysis of Post Cross-Clamp Defibrillation Rates.

作者信息

Buel Shane T, Striker Carrie Whittaker, O'Brien James E

机构信息

Children's Mercy Hospital, Kansas City, Missouri.

出版信息

J Extra Corpor Technol. 2016 Jun;48(2):67-70.

Abstract

There are many cardioplegia solutions currently in use for pediatric cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). The most common being del Nido solution. Another common cardioplegia solution used for pediatric CPB is St. Thomas. In October 2014, Children's Mercy Kansas City changed from the use of modified St. Thomas to del Nido. This study compared rates of post cross-clamp fibrillation requiring defibrillation between del Nido solution and modified St. Thomas solution stratified by weight at Children's Mercy Kansas City. This retrospective study consisted of 394 patients who underwent cardiac surgery requiring cardioplegia between January 1, 2014 and July 31, 2015. The outcome measured was defibrillation upon cross-clamp removal. Statistical significance was determined using Fishers exact test with a two-sided significance level of .05. Incidence of defibrillation post cross-clamp removal was 4.4% in the del Nido group and 26.8% in the St. Thomas group (p < .0001). Analysis by weight stratifications displays a reduction in post cross-clamp defibrillation rates in groups using the del Nido solution. The 0- to 6-kg category had an incidence of fibrillation of 1.23% in the del Nido group and 17.5% in the St. Thomas group (p < .0003). The 6- to 15-kg category had an incidence of defibrillation of 1.82% in the del Nido group and 14% in the St. Thomas group (p < .0198). The 15- to 60-kg category had an incidence of defibrillation of 8.9% in the del Nido group and 61% in the St. Thomas group (p < .0001). The >60-kg category had an incidence of defibrillation of 16.7% in the del Nido group and 63% in the St. Thomas group (p < .0623). This study demonstrates a 6-fold decrease in the overall rate of defibrillation post cross-clamp removal between St. Thomas and del Nido cardioplegia solutions. Analyses of weight stratifications demonstrate a decrease in the rate of defibrillation post cross-clamp removal in all categories within the del Nido group.

摘要

目前有多种心脏停搏液用于小儿体外循环(CPB)。最常用的是德尔尼多溶液。另一种用于小儿CPB的常见心脏停搏液是圣托马斯溶液。2014年10月,堪萨斯城儿童医院从使用改良圣托马斯溶液改为使用德尔尼多溶液。本研究比较了堪萨斯城儿童医院使用德尔尼多溶液和改良圣托马斯溶液的患者在体外循环阻断后需要除颤的室颤发生率,并按体重进行了分层。这项回顾性研究纳入了2014年1月1日至2015年7月31日期间接受需要心脏停搏液的心脏手术的394例患者。测量的结果是体外循环阻断解除时的除颤情况。采用双侧显著性水平为0.05的费舍尔精确检验确定统计学显著性。德尔尼多组体外循环阻断解除后的除颤发生率为4.4%,圣托马斯组为26.8%(p<0.0001)。按体重分层分析显示,使用德尔尼多溶液的组体外循环阻断后除颤率降低。在0至6千克组中,德尔尼多组的室颤发生率为1.23%,圣托马斯组为17.5%(p<0.0003)。在6至15千克组中,德尔尼多组的除颤发生率为1.82%,圣托马斯组为14%(p<0.0198)。在15至60千克组中,德尔尼多组的除颤发生率为8.9%,圣托马斯组为61%(p<0.0001)。体重>60千克组中,德尔尼多组的除颤发生率为16.7%,圣托马斯组为63%(p<0.0623)。本研究表明,圣托马斯溶液和德尔尼多心脏停搏液相比,体外循环阻断解除后的总体除颤率降低了6倍。按体重分层分析表明,德尔尼多组所有类别中体外循环阻断解除后的除颤率均降低。

相似文献

5
DelNido cardioplegia versus St Thomas cardioplegia solution in double valve replacement: a single centre experience.
Perfusion. 2021 Jul;36(5):476-481. doi: 10.1177/0267659120961921. Epub 2020 Nov 17.
7
Which is better for pediatric and adult cardiac surgery: del Nido or St. Thomas cardioplegia? A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Indian J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2023 Nov;39(6):588-600. doi: 10.1007/s12055-023-01553-0. Epub 2023 Aug 1.
9
Initial experience with del Nido cardioplegia solution at a Pediatric and Congenital Cardiac Surgery Program in Brazil.
Perfusion. 2022 Oct;37(7):684-691. doi: 10.1177/02676591211020471. Epub 2021 Jun 3.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluating the need for magnesium administration following cardioplegic arrest with del Nido cardioplegia solution.
J Extra Corpor Technol. 2025 Mar;57(1):9-13. doi: 10.1051/ject/2024033. Epub 2025 Mar 7.
5
Which is better for pediatric and adult cardiac surgery: del Nido or St. Thomas cardioplegia? A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Indian J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2023 Nov;39(6):588-600. doi: 10.1007/s12055-023-01553-0. Epub 2023 Aug 1.
9
Myocardial protection in cardiac surgery: Del Nido versus blood cardioplegia.
Ann Card Anaesth. 2020 Oct-Dec;23(4):477-484. doi: 10.4103/aca.ACA_153_19.

本文引用的文献

2
del Nido versus Buckberg cardioplegia in adult isolated valve surgery.
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2015 Feb;149(2):626-634; discussion 634-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2014.10.085. Epub 2014 Oct 22.
3
Assessing the safety of del Nido cardioplegia solution in adult congenital cases.
Perfusion. 2014 Nov;29(6):554-8. doi: 10.1177/0267659114543346. Epub 2014 Jul 9.
4
Current cardioplegia practice in pediatric cardiac surgery: a North American multiinstitutional survey.
Ann Thorac Surg. 2013 Sep;96(3):923-9. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2013.05.052. Epub 2013 Jul 31.
5
Myocardial protection in cardiac surgery: a historical review from the beginning to the current topics.
Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2013 Sep;61(9):485-96. doi: 10.1007/s11748-013-0279-4. Epub 2013 Jul 23.
6
Myocardial protection in pediatric cardiac surgery.
Artif Organs. 2013 Jan;37(1):16-20. doi: 10.1111/aor.12029.
9
Pediatric cardioplegia strategy results in enhanced calcium metabolism and lower serum troponin T.
Ann Thorac Surg. 2009 May;87(5):1517-23. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2009.02.067.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验