Weeks William B, Weinstein James N
The Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, Lebanon, NH; The Geisel School of Medicine, Hanover, NH.
The Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, Lebanon, NH; The Geisel School of Medicine, Hanover, NH; Dartmouth-Hitchcock Health, Lebanon, NH.
Am J Med. 2017 Jan;130(1):101-104. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2016.08.013. Epub 2016 Sep 2.
To determine whether several measures of health care expenditures, access, and outcomes for the 25 recently identified "least healthy cities in America" differed from those in the rest of America.
For 2004 and 2013, we obtained publicly available price-, age-, sex-, and race-adjusted hospital service area per-capita Medicare expenditures; age-, sex-, and race-adjusted Medicare mortality rates; and 2 indicators of primary care access: the proportion of enrollees having at least one ambulatory visit to a primary care clinician and the per-capita discharge rate for ambulatory care sensitive conditions. Using population weighting, we used Student t test for expenditure data and the chi-squared test for access and outcomes data to compare results of the 25 least healthy cities in aggregate to the rest of America.
In both years examined, the 25 least healthy cities had substantially (about $500 per capita per year) and statistically significantly higher total per-capita Medicare Part A and Part B expenditures than the rest of America: about 4/5 of this difference was due to higher hospital and skilled nursing facility expenditures; physician expenditures were modestly lower in the 25 least healthy cities. While a greater proportion of Medicare beneficiaries in the least healthy cities had a primary care clinician both years, mortality and ambulatory care sensitive condition admission rates were substantially higher in the least healthy cities.
Policymakers and health system executives should work together to determine the best asset allocation across determinants of health that maximizes value creation from a community health perspective.
确定最近确定的美国25个“最不健康城市”在医疗保健支出、可及性和结果方面的多项指标与美国其他地区是否存在差异。
我们获取了2004年和2013年公开可用的按价格、年龄、性别和种族调整后的医院服务区人均医疗保险支出;按年龄、性别和种族调整后的医疗保险死亡率;以及两个初级保健可及性指标:至少有一次门诊就诊于初级保健临床医生的参保者比例和门诊护理敏感疾病的人均出院率。使用人口加权法,我们对支出数据采用学生t检验,对可及性和结果数据采用卡方检验,以比较25个最不健康城市的总体结果与美国其他地区的结果。
在考察的两年中,25个最不健康城市的人均医疗保险A部分和B部分总支出比美国其他地区大幅(每年约人均500美元)且在统计学上显著更高:这种差异的约五分之四归因于更高的医院和熟练护理设施支出;25个最不健康城市的医生支出略低。虽然在这两年中,最不健康城市中更大比例的医疗保险受益人有初级保健临床医生,但最不健康城市的死亡率和门诊护理敏感疾病住院率大幅更高。
政策制定者和卫生系统管理人员应共同努力,确定跨健康决定因素的最佳资源分配,从社区健康角度最大限度地创造价值。