Trásy Domonkos, Tánczos Krisztián, Németh Márton, Hankovszky Péter, Lovas András, Mikor András, Hajdú Edit, Osztroluczki Angelika, Fazakas János, Molnár Zsolt
Faculty of Medicine, Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Therapy, University of Szeged, 6 Semmelweis Street, Szeged 6725, Hungary.
Faculty of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, First Department of Internal Medicine, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary.
J Immunol Res. 2016;2016:3530752. doi: 10.1155/2016/3530752. Epub 2016 Aug 15.
Purpose. To investigate whether absolute value of procalcitonin (PCT) or the change (delta-PCT) is better indicator of infection in intensive care patients. Materials and Methods. Post hoc analysis of a prospective observational study. Patients with suspected new-onset infection were included in whom PCT, C-reactive protein (CRP), temperature, and leukocyte (WBC) values were measured on inclusion (t 0) and data were also available from the previous day (t -1). Based on clinical and microbiological data, patients were grouped post hoc into infection- (I-) and noninfection- (NI-) groups. Results. Of the 114 patients, 85 (75%) had proven infection. PCT levels were similar at t -1: I-group (median [interquartile range]): 1.04 [0.40-3.57] versus NI-group: 0.53 [0.16-1.68], p = 0.444. By t 0 PCT levels were significantly higher in the I-group: 4.62 [1.91-12.62] versus 1.12 [0.30-1.66], p = 0.018. The area under the curve to predict infection for absolute values of PCT was 0.64 [95% CI = 0.52-0.76], p = 0.022; for percentage change: 0.77 [0.66-0.87], p < 0.001; and for delta-PCT: 0.85 [0.78-0.92], p < 0.001. The optimal cut-off value for delta-PCT to indicate infection was 0.76 ng/mL (sensitivity 80 [70-88]%, specificity 86 [68-96]%). Neither absolute values nor changes in CRP, temperature, or WBC could predict infection. Conclusions. Our results suggest that delta-PCT values are superior to absolute values in indicating infection in intensive care patients. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02311816.
目的。探讨降钙素原(PCT)的绝对值或变化值(ΔPCT)是否是重症监护患者感染的更好指标。材料与方法。对一项前瞻性观察性研究进行事后分析。纳入疑似新发感染的患者,在纳入时(t0)测量其PCT、C反应蛋白(CRP)、体温和白细胞(WBC)值,且前一天(t -1)的数据也可用。根据临床和微生物学数据,事后将患者分为感染组(I组)和非感染组(NI组)。结果。114例患者中,85例(75%)确诊感染。t -1时PCT水平相似:I组(中位数[四分位间距]):1.04[0.40 - 3.57],NI组:0.53[0.16 - 1.68],p = 0.444。到t0时,I组PCT水平显著更高:4.62[1.91 - 12.62],而NI组为1.12[0.30 - 1.66],p = 0.018。PCT绝对值预测感染的曲线下面积为;0.64[95%CI = 0.52 - 0.76],p = 0.022;百分比变化为:0.77[0.66 - 0.87],p < 0.001;ΔPCT为:0.85[0.78 - 0.92],p < 0.001。ΔPCT指示感染的最佳截断值为0.76 ng/mL(敏感性80[70 - 88]%,特异性86[68 - 96]%)。CRP、体温或WBC的绝对值及变化均不能预测感染。结论。我们的结果表明,在指示重症监护患者感染方面,ΔPCT值优于绝对值。本试验已在ClinicalTrials.gov注册,标识符:NCT02311816。