Goff Sarah L, Mazor Kathleen M, Pekow Penelope S, White Katharine O, Priya Aruna, Lagu Tara, Guhn-Knight Haley, Murphy Lorna, Youssef Budway Yara, Lindenauer Peter K
The Center for Quality of Care Research and Department of Medicine, Baystate Medical Center/Tufts University School of Medicine, Springfield, Massachusetts;
Meyers Primary Care Institute, Worcester, Massachusetts.
Pediatrics. 2016 Oct;138(4). doi: 10.1542/peds.2016-1140. Epub 2016 Sep 6.
Consumers rarely use publicly reported health care quality data. Despite known barriers to use, few studies have explored the effectiveness of strategies to overcome barriers in vulnerable populations.
This randomized controlled trial tested the impact of a patient navigator intervention to increase consumer use of publicly reported quality data. Patients attending an urban prenatal clinic serving a vulnerable population enrolled between May 2013 and January 2015. The intervention consisted of 2 in-person sessions in which women learned about quality performance and viewed scores for local practices on the Massachusetts Health Quality Partners Web site. Women in both the intervention and control arms received a pamphlet about health care quality. Primary study outcomes were mean clinical quality and patient experience scores of the practices women selected (range 1-4 stars).
Nearly all (726/746; 97.3%) women completed the study, 59.7% were Hispanic, and 65.1% had a high school education or less. In both unadjusted and adjusted models, women in the intervention group chose practices with modestly higher mean clinical quality (3.2 vs 3.0 stars; P = .001) and patient experience (3.0 vs 2.9 stars; P = .05) scores. When asked to rate what factors mattered the most in their decision, few cited quality scores.
An intervention to reduce barriers to using publicly reported health care quality data had a modest effect on patient choice. These findings suggest that factors other than performance on common publicly reported quality metrics have a stronger influence on which pediatric practices women choose.
消费者很少使用公开报告的医疗保健质量数据。尽管已知存在使用障碍,但很少有研究探讨克服弱势群体中障碍的策略的有效性。
这项随机对照试验测试了患者导航干预措施对增加消费者使用公开报告的质量数据的影响。2013年5月至2015年1月期间,在为弱势群体服务的城市产前诊所就诊的患者参与了研究。干预措施包括两次面对面会议,女性在会议中了解质量表现并查看马萨诸塞州健康质量合作伙伴网站上当地医疗机构的评分。干预组和对照组的女性都收到了一份关于医疗保健质量的宣传册。主要研究结果是女性选择的医疗机构的平均临床质量和患者体验评分(范围为1 - 4星)。
几乎所有(726/746;97.3%)女性完成了研究,59.7%为西班牙裔,65.1%接受过高中及以下教育。在未调整和调整后的模型中,干预组女性选择的医疗机构的平均临床质量(3.2星对3.0星;P = 0.001)和患者体验(3.0星对2.9星;P = 0.05)评分略高。当被要求对其决策中最重要的因素进行评分时,很少有人提到质量评分。
一项减少使用公开报告的医疗保健质量数据障碍的干预措施对患者选择有适度影响。这些发现表明,除了常见的公开报告质量指标表现之外,其他因素对女性选择儿科医疗机构的影响更大。