• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

非常快速的病毒学应答和早期丙型肝炎病毒应答动力学,作为比较疗效和指导个体化应答导向治疗的快速措施。

Very rapid virologic response and early HCV response kinetics, as quick measures to compare efficacy and guide a personalized response-guided therapy.

作者信息

Yakoot Mostafa, Abdo Alaa M, Yousry Ahmed, Helmy Sherine

机构信息

Green Clinical Research Center; Abbas Helmy Clinics.

Tropical Medicine and Hepatology Department, Alexandria Faculty of Medicine.

出版信息

Drug Des Devel Ther. 2016 Aug 25;10:2659-67. doi: 10.2147/DDDT.S111496. eCollection 2016.

DOI:10.2147/DDDT.S111496
PMID:27601883
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5003574/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

This is the second and final report for our study designed to compare two generic sofosbuvir products for the degree and speed of virologic response to a dual anti-hepatitis C virus (HCV) treatment protocol. We aimed to test the applicability of the early virus response kinetics and the very rapid virologic response (vRVR) rate as quick outcome measures for accelerated comparative efficacy studies and as a foundation for a personalized response-guided therapy.

METHODS

Fifty eligible chronic HCV patients were randomized to either one of two generic sofosbuvir products (Gratisovir or Grateziano) at a daily dose of one 400 mg tablet plus a weight-based ribavirin dose. Data were compared between the groups for early virus response kinetics and vRVR rates in relation to the rates of final sustained virologic response at week 12 posttreatment (SVR12).

RESULTS

The Log10 transformed virus load (Log polymerase chain reaction) curves showed fairly similar rapid decline during the first 2 weeks, with no significant difference between the groups at four analysis points throughout the study by repeated-measures factorial analysis of variance test (P=0.48). The SVR12 rates were 96% (95% confidence interval, 79.6%-99.9%) in Gratisovir group (24/25) and 95.7% (95% confidence interval, 78%-99.9%) in Grateziano group (22/23). There was no statistically significant difference found by exact test (P>0.999). There was a significant association between the vRVR and the SVR12, with 100% positive predictive value (38/38 of those who had vRVR, achieved a final SVR12) and 82.6% sensitivity (among the total 46 with SVR12, 38 were having vRVR).

CONCLUSION

We can conclude from our study that the early HCV response kinetics and the vRVR rates could be used as sensitive quick markers for efficacy (with a very high positive predictive value for SVR12), based on our accelerated comparative efficacy research model. This might open the way for new models of accelerated equivalence efficacy studies along with the bioequivalence kinetics studies to test a generic drug against a reference. Also, the early response kinetics and the vRVR might be used as qualifiers for a personalized course of treatment. This could shorten unnecessarily long treatment courses in rapid responders and might help to avoid relapses in slow responders.

摘要

背景

这是我们研究的第二篇也是最后一篇报告,该研究旨在比较两种索磷布韦仿制药产品对双重抗丙型肝炎病毒(HCV)治疗方案的病毒学应答程度和速度。我们旨在测试早期病毒应答动力学和极快速病毒学应答(vRVR)率作为加速比较疗效研究的快速结局指标以及个性化应答指导治疗基础的适用性。

方法

50例符合条件的慢性HCV患者被随机分配至两种索磷布韦仿制药产品(Gratisovir或Grateziano)中的一种,每日剂量为1片400mg片剂加基于体重的利巴韦林剂量。比较两组之间早期病毒应答动力学和vRVR率与治疗后第12周最终持续病毒学应答(SVR12)率的关系。

结果

Log10转换的病毒载量(Log聚合酶链反应)曲线在前2周显示出相当相似且快速的下降,通过重复测量方差分析在整个研究的四个分析点上两组之间无显著差异(P = 0.48)。Gratisovir组的SVR12率为96%(95%置信区间,79.6% - 99.9%)(24/25),Grateziano组为95.7%(95%置信区间,78% - 99.9%)(22/23)。精确检验未发现统计学显著差异(P>0.999)。vRVR与SVR12之间存在显著关联,阳性预测值为100%(38例有vRVR者中有38例最终实现SVR12),敏感性为82.6%(在46例有SVR12者中,38例有vRVR)。

结论

基于我们的加速比较疗效研究模型,我们可以从研究中得出结论,早期HCV应答动力学和vRVR率可作为疗效的敏感快速标志物(对SVR1来说阳性预测值非常高)。这可能为加速等效性疗效研究的新模型以及生物等效性动力学研究开辟道路,以测试仿制药与参比制剂。此外,早期应答动力学和vRVR可能用作个性化治疗疗程的限定指标。这可以缩短快速应答者不必要的长疗程,并可能有助于避免缓慢应答者复发。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7a5c/5003574/2e7b33e4fb71/dddt-10-2659Fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7a5c/5003574/e971bf711fd4/dddt-10-2659Fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7a5c/5003574/e85ef4b348dc/dddt-10-2659Fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7a5c/5003574/dc68e8ad5700/dddt-10-2659Fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7a5c/5003574/2e7b33e4fb71/dddt-10-2659Fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7a5c/5003574/e971bf711fd4/dddt-10-2659Fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7a5c/5003574/e85ef4b348dc/dddt-10-2659Fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7a5c/5003574/dc68e8ad5700/dddt-10-2659Fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7a5c/5003574/2e7b33e4fb71/dddt-10-2659Fig4.jpg

相似文献

1
Very rapid virologic response and early HCV response kinetics, as quick measures to compare efficacy and guide a personalized response-guided therapy.非常快速的病毒学应答和早期丙型肝炎病毒应答动力学,作为比较疗效和指导个体化应答导向治疗的快速措施。
Drug Des Devel Ther. 2016 Aug 25;10:2659-67. doi: 10.2147/DDDT.S111496. eCollection 2016.
2
Response Tailored Protocol Versus the Fixed 12Weeks Course of Dual Sofosbuvir/Daclatasvir Treatment in Egyptian Patients With Chronic Hepatitis C Genotype-4 Infection: A Randomized, Open-label, Non-inferiority Trial.针对埃及慢性丙型肝炎基因型 4 感染患者的应答个体化方案与双索非布韦/达卡他韦固定 12 周疗程的对比:一项随机、开放标签、非劣效性试验。
EBioMedicine. 2017 Jul;21:182-187. doi: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2017.05.011. Epub 2017 May 17.
3
The very-rapid and the ultra-rapid virologic response to two treatment options in patients with chronic hepatitis C: an interim report of a prospective randomized comparative effectiveness study.慢性丙型肝炎患者对两种治疗方案的快速和超快速病毒学应答:一项前瞻性随机对照有效性研究的中期报告
Drug Des Devel Ther. 2015 Nov 11;9:6027-33. doi: 10.2147/DDDT.S95499. eCollection 2015.
4
Efficacy of ledipasvir and sofosbuvir, with or without ribavirin, for 12 weeks in patients with HCV genotype 3 or 6 infection.利巴韦林联合或不联合 ledipasvir 和 sofosbuvir 治疗 12 周治疗 HCV 基因型 3 或 6 感染患者的疗效。
Gastroenterology. 2015 Nov;149(6):1454-1461.e1. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2015.07.063. Epub 2015 Aug 7.
5
Sustained Virologic Response at 24 Weeks after the End of Treatment Is a Better Predictor for Treatment Outcome in Real-World HCV-Infected Patients Treated by HCV NS3/4A Protease Inhibitors with Peginterferon plus Ribavirin.治疗结束后24周的持续病毒学应答是预测在现实世界中接受HCV NS3/4A蛋白酶抑制剂联合聚乙二醇干扰素和利巴韦林治疗的丙型肝炎病毒感染患者治疗结局的更好指标。
Int J Med Sci. 2016 Apr 10;13(4):310-5. doi: 10.7150/ijms.14953. eCollection 2016.
6
Response-guided therapy for chronic hepatitis C virus infection in patients coinfected with HIV: a pilot trial.HIV合并感染患者慢性丙型肝炎病毒感染的反应导向治疗:一项试点试验。
Clin Infect Dis. 2009 Apr 15;48(8):1152-9. doi: 10.1086/597470.
7
Randomized trial of daclatasvir and asunaprevir with or without PegIFN/RBV for hepatitis C virus genotype 1 null responders.达卡他韦和asunaprevir 联合或不联合 PegIFN/RBV 治疗丙型肝炎病毒 1 型无应答者的随机试验。
J Hepatol. 2014 Mar;60(3):490-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2013.10.019. Epub 2013 Oct 26.
8
Daclatasvir with sofosbuvir and ribavirin for hepatitis C virus infection with advanced cirrhosis or post-liver transplantation recurrence.达卡他韦联合索磷布韦和利巴韦林用于治疗伴有晚期肝硬化或肝移植后复发的丙型肝炎病毒感染。
Hepatology. 2016 May;63(5):1493-505. doi: 10.1002/hep.28446. Epub 2016 Mar 7.
9
Early viral kinetics and treatment outcome in combination of high-dose interferon induction vs. pegylated interferon plus ribavirin for naive patients infected with hepatitis C virus of genotype 1b and high viral load.初治的1b型丙型肝炎病毒感染且病毒载量高的患者,大剂量干扰素诱导联合治疗与聚乙二醇干扰素加利巴韦林联合治疗的早期病毒动力学及治疗结果
J Med Virol. 2005 Jan;75(1):27-34. doi: 10.1002/jmv.20232.
10
Efficacy and safety of simeprevir with PegIFN/ribavirin in naïve or experienced patients infected with chronic HCV genotype 4.西美瑞韦联合聚乙二醇干扰素/利巴韦林治疗初治或经治慢性丙型肝炎病毒 4 型感染患者的疗效和安全性。
J Hepatol. 2015 May;62(5):1047-55. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2014.12.031. Epub 2015 Jan 14.

引用本文的文献

1
Effectiveness of sofosbuvir based direct-acting antiviral regimens for chronic hepatitis C virus genotype 6 patients: Real-world experience in Vietnam.索磷布韦为基础的直接作用抗病毒方案治疗慢性丙型肝炎病毒 6 型患者的疗效:越南的真实世界经验。
PLoS One. 2020 May 20;15(5):e0233446. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0233446. eCollection 2020.
2
Effectiveness of generic direct-acting agents for the treatment of hepatitis C: systematic review and meta-analysis.通用直接作用抗病毒药物治疗丙型肝炎的疗效:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Bull World Health Organ. 2020 Mar 1;98(3):188-197K. doi: 10.2471/BLT.19.231522. Epub 2019 Nov 8.
3
Clinical utility of ledipasvir/sofosbuvir in the treatment of adolescents and children with hepatitis C.

本文引用的文献

1
Clinical value of on-treatment HCV RNA levels during different sofosbuvir-based antiviral regimens.不同索磷布韦为基础的抗病毒方案治疗过程中 HCV RNA 水平的临床价值。
J Hepatol. 2016 Sep;65(3):473-82. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2016.04.006. Epub 2016 Apr 13.
2
Hepatitis C Viral Kinetic Changes in a Retrospective Cohort Study of Chronic Hepatitis C Virus Egyptian Patients on Pegylated Interferon and Ribavirin Therapy.埃及慢性丙型肝炎病毒患者接受聚乙二醇干扰素和利巴韦林治疗的回顾性队列研究中丙型肝炎病毒动力学变化
J Interferon Cytokine Res. 2016 Mar;36(3):149-58. doi: 10.1089/jir.2015.0099.
3
HCV kinetic and modeling analyses indicate similar time to cure among sofosbuvir combination regimens with daclatasvir, simeprevir or ledipasvir.
来迪派韦/索磷布韦治疗青少年和儿童丙型肝炎的临床效用
Adolesc Health Med Ther. 2018 Jul 30;9:103-110. doi: 10.2147/AHMT.S147896. eCollection 2018.
4
Sofosbuvir Based Regimen in Management of Hepatitis C for Patients With End Stage Renal Disease on Hemodialysis: A Single Center Experience from India.基于索磷布韦的方案用于血液透析的终末期肾病患者丙型肝炎的管理:来自印度的单中心经验
J Clin Exp Hepatol. 2018 Jun;8(2):116-120. doi: 10.1016/j.jceh.2017.10.001. Epub 2017 Nov 10.
5
Chronic Hepatitis C: Do Generics Work as Well as Branded Drugs?慢性丙型肝炎:仿制药的效果与品牌药一样好吗?
J Clin Exp Hepatol. 2017 Sep;7(3):253-261. doi: 10.1016/j.jceh.2017.08.003. Epub 2017 Sep 23.
6
Response Tailored Protocol Versus the Fixed 12Weeks Course of Dual Sofosbuvir/Daclatasvir Treatment in Egyptian Patients With Chronic Hepatitis C Genotype-4 Infection: A Randomized, Open-label, Non-inferiority Trial.针对埃及慢性丙型肝炎基因型 4 感染患者的应答个体化方案与双索非布韦/达卡他韦固定 12 周疗程的对比:一项随机、开放标签、非劣效性试验。
EBioMedicine. 2017 Jul;21:182-187. doi: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2017.05.011. Epub 2017 May 17.
丙型肝炎病毒动力学和模型分析表明,在索非布韦与达卡他韦、西米普韦或来迪帕司韦的联合治疗方案中,达到治愈的时间相似。
J Hepatol. 2016 Jun;64(6):1232-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2016.02.022. Epub 2016 Feb 22.
4
The very-rapid and the ultra-rapid virologic response to two treatment options in patients with chronic hepatitis C: an interim report of a prospective randomized comparative effectiveness study.慢性丙型肝炎患者对两种治疗方案的快速和超快速病毒学应答:一项前瞻性随机对照有效性研究的中期报告
Drug Des Devel Ther. 2015 Nov 11;9:6027-33. doi: 10.2147/DDDT.S95499. eCollection 2015.
5
Four-Week Direct-Acting Antiviral Regimens in Noncirrhotic Patients With Hepatitis C Virus Genotype 1 Infection: An Open-Label, Nonrandomized Trial.针对丙型肝炎病毒1型感染的非肝硬化患者的四周直接抗病毒治疗方案:一项开放标签、非随机试验。
Ann Intern Med. 2015 Dec 15;163(12):899-907. doi: 10.7326/M15-0642. Epub 2015 Nov 24.
6
Hepatitis C guidance: AASLD-IDSA recommendations for testing, managing, and treating adults infected with hepatitis C virus.丙型肝炎指南:美国肝病研究学会-美国感染病学会关于丙型肝炎病毒感染成人检测、管理及治疗的建议
Hepatology. 2015 Sep;62(3):932-54. doi: 10.1002/hep.27950. Epub 2015 Aug 4.
7
Sofosbuvir plus ribavirin for treating Egyptian patients with hepatitis C genotype 4.索磷布韦联合利巴韦林治疗埃及 4 型丙型肝炎患者。
J Hepatol. 2015 Sep;63(3):581-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2015.04.023. Epub 2015 May 1.
8
Sofosbuvir plus ribavirin for the treatment of chronic genotype 4 hepatitis C virus infection in patients of Egyptian ancestry.索磷布韦联合利巴韦林治疗埃及裔慢性基因型 4 丙型肝炎病毒感染患者。
J Hepatol. 2015 May;62(5):1040-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2014.10.044. Epub 2014 Nov 5.
9
HCV direct-acting antiviral agents: the best interferon-free combinations.HCV 直接作用抗病毒药物:最佳无干扰素联合治疗方案。
Liver Int. 2014 Feb;34 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):69-78. doi: 10.1111/liv.12423.
10
HCV burden of infection in Egypt: results from a nationwide survey.埃及的 HCV 感染负担:一项全国性调查的结果。
J Viral Hepat. 2012 Aug;19(8):560-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2893.2011.01576.x. Epub 2012 Feb 6.