Suppr超能文献

客观结构化临床考试中的作弊行为:模拟安全漏洞对客观结构化临床考试表现的影响。

Cheating in OSCEs: The Impact of Simulated Security Breaches on OSCE Performance.

作者信息

Gotzmann Andrea, De Champlain André, Homayra Fahmida, Fotheringham Alexa, de Vries Ingrid, Forgie Melissa, Pugh Debra

机构信息

a Medical Council of Canada , Ottawa , Ontario , Canada.

b Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa , Ottawa , Ontario , Canada.

出版信息

Teach Learn Med. 2017 Jan-Mar;29(1):52-58. doi: 10.1080/10401334.2016.1202832. Epub 2016 Sep 7.

Abstract

UNLABELLED

Construct: Valid score interpretation is important for constructs in performance assessments such as objective structured clinical examinations (OSCEs). An OSCE is a type of performance assessment in which a series of standardized patients interact with the student or candidate who is scored by either the standardized patient or a physician examiner.

BACKGROUND

In high-stakes examinations, test security is an important issue. Students accessing unauthorized test materials can create an unfair advantage and lead to examination scores that do not reflect students' true ability level. The purpose of this study was to assess the impact of various simulated security breaches on OSCE scores.

APPROACH

Seventy-six 3rd-year medical students participated in an 8-station OSCE and were randomized to either a control group or to 1 of 2 experimental conditions simulating test security breaches: station topic (i.e., providing a list of station topics prior to the examination) or egregious security breach (i.e., providing detailed content information prior to the examination). Overall total scores were compared for the 3 groups using both a one-way between-subjects analysis of variance and a repeated measure analysis of variance to compare the checklist, rating scales, and oral question subscores across the three conditions.

RESULTS

Overall total scores were highest for the egregious security breach condition (81.8%), followed by the station topic condition (73.6%), and they were lowest for the control group (67.4%). This trend was also found with checklist subscores only (79.1%, 64.9%, and 60.3%, respectively for the security breach, station topic, and control conditions). Rating scale subscores were higher for both the station topic and egregious security breach conditions compared to the control group (82.6%, 83.1%, and 77.6%, respectively). Oral question subscores were significantly higher for the egregious security breach condition (88.8%) followed by the station topic condition (64.3%), and they were the lowest for the control group (48.6%).

CONCLUSIONS

This simulation of different OSCE security breaches demonstrated that student performance is greatly advantaged by having prior access to test materials. This has important implications for medical educators as they develop policies and procedures regarding the safeguarding and reuse of test content.

摘要

未加标注

构建:在诸如客观结构化临床考试(OSCE)等绩效评估的构建中,有效的分数解释很重要。OSCE是一种绩效评估类型,其中一系列标准化患者与由标准化患者或医师考官评分的学生或考生进行互动。

背景

在高风险考试中,考试安全是一个重要问题。学生获取未经授权的考试材料会创造不公平优势,并导致考试分数不能反映学生的真实能力水平。本研究的目的是评估各种模拟安全漏洞对OSCE分数的影响。

方法

76名三年级医学生参加了一个8站式的OSCE,并被随机分为对照组或两种模拟考试安全漏洞的实验条件之一:考站主题(即考试前提供考站主题列表)或严重安全漏洞(即考试前提供详细内容信息)。使用单因素组间方差分析和重复测量方差分析比较三组的总体总分,以比较三种条件下的检查表、评分量表和口试子分数。

结果

严重安全漏洞条件下的总体总分最高(81.8%),其次是考站主题条件(73.6%),对照组最低(67.4%)。仅检查表子分数也发现了这种趋势(安全漏洞、考站主题和对照条件分别为79.1%、64.9%和60.3%)。与对照组相比,考站主题和严重安全漏洞条件下的评分量表子分数更高(分别为82.6%、83.1%和77.6%)。严重安全漏洞条件下的口试子分数显著更高(88.8%),其次是考站主题条件(64.3%),对照组最低(48.6%)。

结论

这种对不同OSCE安全漏洞的模拟表明,提前获取考试材料对学生成绩有很大优势。这对医学教育工作者制定有关考试内容保护和重复使用的政策和程序具有重要意义。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验