Peter John Victor, Thomas Kurien, Jeyaseelan Lakshmanan, Yadav Bijesh, Sudarsan Thomas Isiah, Christina Jony, Revathi Anna, John K R, Sudarsanam Thambu David
Medical Intensive Care Unit,Christian Medical
Department of Medicine,Pondicherry Institute of Medical Sciences (PIMS).
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2016 Jan;32(4):241-245. doi: 10.1017/S0266462316000398. Epub 2016 Sep 9.
The majority of patients in India access private sector providers for curative medical services. However, there is scanty information on the cost of treatment of critically ill patients in this setting. The study evaluates the cost and extent of financial subsidy required for patients admitted to an intensive care unit (ICU) in India.
Data on direct medical, direct nonmedical, and indirect cost were prospectively collected from critically ill patients admitted to a tertiary teaching hospital in India. Willingness-to-pay (WTP) amount was obtained from the next-of-kin following admission and the actual cost paid by the family at discharge was recorded.
The main diagnoses (n = 499) were infection (26 percent) and poisoning (21 percent). The mean APACHE-II score was 13.9 (95 percent confidence interval [CI], 13.3-14.5); 86 percent were ventilated. ICU stay was 7.8 days (95 percent CI, 7.3-8.3). Hospital mortality was 27.9 percent. Direct medical cost accounted for 77 percent (US$ 2164) of the total treatment cost (US$ 2818). Indirect cost and direct nonmedical cost contributed to 19 percent (US$ 547.5) and 4 percent (US$ 106.5), respectively. Average total and daily ICU cost were US$ 1,897 and US$ 255, respectively. Although the family's WTP was 53 percent (US$ 1146; 95 percent CI, 1090-1204) of direct medical cost, their final contribution was 67.7 percent (US$ 1465; 95 percent CI, 1327-1604).
The cost of an ICU admission in our setting is US$ 2818. Although the family's contribution to expenses exceeded their initial WTP, a substantial subsidy (33 percent) is still required. Alternate financing strategies for the poor and optimization of ICU resources are urgently required.
印度大多数患者通过私立医疗机构获取治疗性医疗服务。然而,关于在此情况下重症患者的治疗费用,相关信息却非常匮乏。本研究评估了印度一家重症监护病房(ICU)收治患者的治疗费用以及所需的财政补贴程度。
前瞻性收集了印度一家三级教学医院收治的重症患者的直接医疗费用、直接非医疗费用和间接费用数据。入院后从患者家属处获取支付意愿(WTP)金额,并记录出院时家庭实际支付的费用。
主要诊断(n = 499)为感染(26%)和中毒(21%)。平均急性生理与慢性健康状况评分系统II(APACHE-II)评分为13.9(95%置信区间[CI],13.3 - 14.5);86%的患者接受了机械通气。ICU住院时间为7.8天(95%CI,7.3 - 8.3)。医院死亡率为27.9%。直接医疗费用占总治疗费用(2818美元)的77%(2164美元)。间接费用和直接非医疗费用分别占19%(547.5美元)和4%(106.5美元)。ICU平均总费用和每日费用分别为1897美元和255美元。尽管家庭的支付意愿为直接医疗费用的53%(1146美元;95%CI,1090 - 1204),但其最终贡献为67.7%(1465美元;95%CI,1327 - 1604)。
在我们的研究环境中,入住ICU的费用为2818美元。尽管家庭对费用的贡献超过了其最初的支付意愿,但仍需要大量补贴(33%)。迫切需要为贫困人群制定替代融资策略并优化ICU资源。