Department of Hydrobiology, Inland Fisheries Institute, Oczapowskiego 10, 10-719 Olsztyn, Poland.
University of Gdansk, Faculty of Oceanography and Geography, Department of Marine Biotechnology, al. Piłsudskiego 46, 81-378 Gdynia, Poland.
Water Res. 2016 Nov 1;104:532-546. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2016.08.016. Epub 2016 Aug 15.
The biovolume of phytoplankton must be assessed accurately in order to identify the ecological status of water bodies in line with the WFD requirements. Hence, the current study has been carried out to verify and improve the precision of as well as to facilitate and accelerate estimations of phytoplankton biovolume by reviewing and rearranging the basic geometrical shapes of these organisms applied in such evaluations. The latest standards comprise 17 geometric shapes and equations suitable for estimations of cell/filament/colony biovolume and additionally include taxa-specific 'geometric correction factors' to fit real shapes and 'hidden dimension factors' to achieve data on hardly measureable dimensions. This paper also discusses possible obstacles to making correct biovolume assessments, especially when analyzing taxa of special concern, e.g. Ceratium hirundinella, C. furcoides or Pediastrum duplex and Pseudopediastrum boryanum. Our comparison of two approaches, the previous and the new one, revealed that they yield statistically significantly different biovolume results of these species. Some recommendations how to deal with the new and old methods of biovolume estimations and how to reduce the possibility of errors with overestimation and underestimation were also given. The more recent method can be said to give more precise estimates of phytoplankton biovolume. Besides, it facilitates more rapid phytoplankton analyses in most cases, which is very useful when assessing the ecological status of lakes during routine monitoring programs.
为了根据 WFD 要求确定水体的生态状况,必须准确评估浮游植物的生物量。因此,本研究旨在通过回顾和重新排列这些生物在评估中的基本几何形状,验证和提高浮游植物生物量的精度,以及促进和加速其估算。最新标准包括 17 种适合于细胞/丝/群体生物量估算的几何形状和方程,并额外包括针对特定分类群的“几何校正因子”,以拟合实际形状,以及“隐藏维度因子”,以获取难以测量尺寸的数据。本文还讨论了在进行正确的生物量评估时可能遇到的障碍,特别是在分析特殊关注的分类群时,例如旋链角毛藻、弯角角毛藻或双型蹄形藻和伪蹄形藻。我们对两种方法(旧方法和新方法)进行了比较,结果表明它们对这些物种的生物量产生了统计学上显著不同的结果。还给出了如何处理生物量估算的新老方法以及如何减少高估和低估错误可能性的一些建议。较新的方法可以说是更精确地估计了浮游植物的生物量。此外,在大多数情况下,它还可以更快速地进行浮游植物分析,这在例行监测计划中评估湖泊的生态状况时非常有用。