Department of Epidemiology, Shandong University School of Public Health, Jinan 250012, China.
Department of Epidemiology, Shandong University School of Public Health, Jinan 250012, China; The University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, TN 38163, USA.
Compr Psychiatry. 2016 Oct;70:134-40. doi: 10.1016/j.comppsych.2016.07.005. Epub 2016 Jul 16.
This study aimed to compare the similarities and differences between suicide completers and attempters in rural China.
Two paired case-control studies of completed suicide and suicide attempts were conducted in rural Shandong, China. This analysis included 409 suicide attempters (SA) with a mean age of 43.90 (SD=13.31), 117 suicide completers (SC) with a mean age of 50.38 (SD=13.02) and their controls matched by gender, age (within 3years), and residence. Logistic regression models were used to examine risk factors of suicide attempts and completed suicide and the differences between SA and SC.
Compared to their matched controls, suicide attempters and completers shared the following common risk factors: low levels of education (middle school or under) (OR, 95% CI: 2.79, 1.40-5.55 for SA and 16.98, 1.59-181.60 for SC), negative life events (OR, 95% CI: 7.37, 4.73-11.50 for SA and 21.08, 4.74-93.71 for SC), and mental disorders (OR, 95% CI: 7.52, 3.85-14.69 for SA and 22.39, 2.65-189.60 for SC). Compared to suicide attempts, completed suicide was associated with the following risk factors: male gender (OR, 95% CI: 1.75, 1.06-2.90), advancing age (OR, 95% CI: 1.02, 1.00-1.04), poor family economic status (OR, 95% CI: 6.74, 3.22-14.13), prior suicide attempts (OR, 95% CI: 2.43, 1.18-4.97), family suicide history (OR, 95% CI: 2.59, 1.33-5.06), high suicide intent (OR, 95% CI: 1.15, 1.05-1.27), and highly lethal methods (OR, 95% CI: 13.65, 6.51-28.59).
Although suicide completers and attempters share some common risk factors, suicide completers are more likely to have prior suicide attempts, family suicide history, and higher suicidal intent, and to use highly lethal methods in rural Chinese.
本研究旨在比较中国农村地区自杀既遂者和未遂者之间的异同。
在中国山东省农村地区进行了两项配对病例对照研究,分别是自杀未遂和自杀既遂。本分析纳入了 409 名自杀未遂者(SA),平均年龄为 43.90(SD=13.31),117 名自杀既遂者(SC),平均年龄为 50.38(SD=13.02),并按性别、年龄(3 年内)和居住地与对照组进行匹配。采用逻辑回归模型,对自杀未遂和自杀既遂的危险因素以及 SA 和 SC 之间的差异进行了检验。
与匹配对照组相比,自杀未遂者和既遂者有以下共同的危险因素:受教育程度低(中学及以下)(SA 的 OR,95%CI:2.79,1.40-5.55;SC 的 OR,16.98,1.59-181.60)、负性生活事件(SA 的 OR,95%CI:7.37,4.73-11.50;SC 的 OR,21.08,4.74-93.71)和精神障碍(SA 的 OR,95%CI:7.52,3.85-14.69;SC 的 OR,22.39,2.65-189.60)。与自杀未遂相比,自杀既遂与以下危险因素相关:男性(OR,95%CI:1.75,1.06-2.90)、年龄增长(OR,95%CI:1.02,1.00-1.04)、家庭经济状况较差(OR,95%CI:6.74,3.22-14.13)、有过自杀未遂史(OR,95%CI:2.43,1.18-4.97)、家族自杀史(OR,95%CI:2.59,1.33-5.06)、自杀意念强烈(OR,95%CI:1.15,1.05-1.27)和采用高致命性方法(OR,95%CI:13.65,6.51-28.59)。
尽管自杀未遂者和既遂者有一些共同的危险因素,但在中国农村地区,自杀既遂者更有可能有过自杀未遂史、家族自杀史、自杀意念更强烈,且更倾向于采用高致命性方法。